Dorian Q Fuller , Louis Champion , Cristina Cobo Castillo , Anna den Hollander
{"title":"Cotton and post-Neolithic investment agriculture in tropical Asia and Africa, with two routes to West Africa","authors":"Dorian Q Fuller , Louis Champion , Cristina Cobo Castillo , Anna den Hollander","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article provides an up-to-date review of the origins and spread of cottons in the Old World based on archaeobotanical evidence, and explores the routes and socioeconomic context through which cotton cultivation became established across the tropics and sub-tropics of Asia and Africa. Two cotton species were domesticated in the Old World, one of which was grown for millennia as a long-lived tree (<em>Gossypium arboreum</em>) and the other as a shrub over several years (<em>Gossypium herbaceum</em>). While <em>G. arboreum</em> began to be cultivated during the Middle Holocene (7000–4000 years ago) in Pakistan and Northwest India, <em>G. herbaceum</em> was likely domesticated in Africa, perhaps in Sudan. Evidence for cultivation of cotton in Sudan dates from around 2000 years ago, the same period that import of cotton from India into the Roman world was common. The spread of cotton through the African continent involved three trajectories. In southeast Africa, its near coastal islands and Madgascar, received cotton, inferred to be <em>G. arboreum</em> from India, around 1000 years ago in the context of increasing contact across the Indian ocean. As for western Africa, we postulate two dispersal routes: an oasis route through the Sahara and Sahel that focused on <em>G. herbaceum,</em> and a savanna route further south that brought <em>G. arboreum</em> to Cameroon, Benin and Ghana.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24002773/pdfft?md5=092501e459c977d577643c980297cbe5&pid=1-s2.0-S2352409X24002773-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24002773","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article provides an up-to-date review of the origins and spread of cottons in the Old World based on archaeobotanical evidence, and explores the routes and socioeconomic context through which cotton cultivation became established across the tropics and sub-tropics of Asia and Africa. Two cotton species were domesticated in the Old World, one of which was grown for millennia as a long-lived tree (Gossypium arboreum) and the other as a shrub over several years (Gossypium herbaceum). While G. arboreum began to be cultivated during the Middle Holocene (7000–4000 years ago) in Pakistan and Northwest India, G. herbaceum was likely domesticated in Africa, perhaps in Sudan. Evidence for cultivation of cotton in Sudan dates from around 2000 years ago, the same period that import of cotton from India into the Roman world was common. The spread of cotton through the African continent involved three trajectories. In southeast Africa, its near coastal islands and Madgascar, received cotton, inferred to be G. arboreum from India, around 1000 years ago in the context of increasing contact across the Indian ocean. As for western Africa, we postulate two dispersal routes: an oasis route through the Sahara and Sahel that focused on G. herbaceum, and a savanna route further south that brought G. arboreum to Cameroon, Benin and Ghana.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.