Athletes and aggression: A systematic review of physical and verbal off-field behaviors

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Aggression and Violent Behavior Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.avb.2024.101977
Fiona N. Conway , Sabrina M. Todaro , Laura M. Lesnewich , Nicola L. de Souza , Erin Nolen , Jake Samora , Haelim Jeong , Jennifer F. Buckman
{"title":"Athletes and aggression: A systematic review of physical and verbal off-field behaviors","authors":"Fiona N. Conway ,&nbsp;Sabrina M. Todaro ,&nbsp;Laura M. Lesnewich ,&nbsp;Nicola L. de Souza ,&nbsp;Erin Nolen ,&nbsp;Jake Samora ,&nbsp;Haelim Jeong ,&nbsp;Jennifer F. Buckman","doi":"10.1016/j.avb.2024.101977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For decades, scientists have explored the link between aggressive behaviors and being an athlete based on a persistent concern that behaviors encouraged during competition influence actions outside the sports context. Numerous publications have investigated the relationship between athlete identity and engaging in aggressive behaviors. Only a small percentage have used psychometrically validated instruments to measure aggressive behaviors. This is a critical limitation. The aim of this review is to summarize findings from studies preceding January 2023 that used validated measures to identify types and intensity of aggression. A total of 7392 articles were identified from several databases. Thirty-eight met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen compared athletes to non-athletes, and 23 examined aggression using athlete-only samples. Six comparison studies found no differences between athletes and non-athletes. Nine had mixed results. Among the studies that used athlete-only samples, competitive level, age, and sport type differentiated scores on the aggression measures. Methodological differences in the study designs (e.g., sample size, sport type, and competitive level) make it difficult to draw generalizable conclusions from this body of literature. Future research on this topic should focus on carefully constructing new studies or replicating existing ones paying close attention to the measurement instruments and study design methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51360,"journal":{"name":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178924000673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, scientists have explored the link between aggressive behaviors and being an athlete based on a persistent concern that behaviors encouraged during competition influence actions outside the sports context. Numerous publications have investigated the relationship between athlete identity and engaging in aggressive behaviors. Only a small percentage have used psychometrically validated instruments to measure aggressive behaviors. This is a critical limitation. The aim of this review is to summarize findings from studies preceding January 2023 that used validated measures to identify types and intensity of aggression. A total of 7392 articles were identified from several databases. Thirty-eight met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen compared athletes to non-athletes, and 23 examined aggression using athlete-only samples. Six comparison studies found no differences between athletes and non-athletes. Nine had mixed results. Among the studies that used athlete-only samples, competitive level, age, and sport type differentiated scores on the aggression measures. Methodological differences in the study designs (e.g., sample size, sport type, and competitive level) make it difficult to draw generalizable conclusions from this body of literature. Future research on this topic should focus on carefully constructing new studies or replicating existing ones paying close attention to the measurement instruments and study design methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动员与攻击行为:对场外肢体和言语行为的系统回顾
几十年来,科学家们一直在探索攻击性行为与运动员身份之间的联系,因为他们一直担心,在比赛中受到鼓励的行为会影响到运动范围之外的行为。许多出版物研究了运动员身份与参与攻击性行为之间的关系。只有一小部分使用了经过心理测量学验证的工具来测量攻击性行为。这是一个重要的局限性。本综述旨在总结 2023 年 1 月之前的研究结果,这些研究使用了经过验证的方法来确定攻击行为的类型和强度。我们从多个数据库中找到了 7392 篇文章。其中 38 篇符合纳入标准。其中 15 篇对运动员和非运动员进行了比较,23 篇仅使用运动员样本对攻击行为进行了研究。六项比较研究发现运动员和非运动员之间没有差异。九项研究结果不一。在仅使用运动员样本的研究中,竞技水平、年龄和运动类型会对攻击性测量的得分产生影响。研究设计方法上的差异(如样本大小、运动类型和竞技水平)使得很难从这些文献中得出可推广的结论。今后对这一主题的研究应侧重于仔细构建新的研究或复制现有的研究,并密切关注测量工具和研究设计方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Aggression and Violent Behavior, A Review Journal is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes substantive and integrative reviews, as well as summary reports of innovative ongoing clinical research programs on a wide range of topics germane to the field of aggression and violent behavior. Papers encompass a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including homicide (serial, spree, and mass murder: sexual homicide), sexual deviance and assault (rape, serial rape, child molestation, paraphilias), child and youth violence (firesetting, gang violence, juvenile sexual offending), family violence (child physical and sexual abuse, child neglect, incest, spouse and elder abuse), genetic predispositions, and the physiological basis of aggression.
期刊最新文献
The dark sides of the brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies on trait aggression External workplace violence towards police officers: A scoping review Effectiveness of Virtual Reality interventions for aggression, anger and impulsiveness: A multilevel meta-analysis Editors' introduction The school bullying research program: How it has developed, 1976-2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1