R&D tax credits and innovation

IF 4.8 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Public Economics Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105157
Walter Melnik , Andrew Smyth
{"title":"R&D tax credits and innovation","authors":"Walter Melnik ,&nbsp;Andrew Smyth","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous work suggests that research and development (R&amp;D) tax credits increase R&amp;D expenditure. We exploit the staggered adoption of state-level R&amp;D tax credits in the United States to examine their effect on innovation itself. In particular, we consider ten commonly-studied patent characteristics that have received little or no attention in the extant literature on R&amp;D incentives. Our empirical approach suggests that R&amp;D tax credits reduce the user cost of R&amp;D and increase R&amp;D expenditure, but we find no aggregate evidence that such credits increase patenting in credit-adopting states. Nor do credits increase the scientific quality of patents, as captured by patent citations. On the other hand, R&amp;D tax credits increase patent novelty and we see large and significant increases in the market value of patents in credit-adopting states. All of our aggregate results are driven by states with larger effective credits and by larger firms, because such firms produce the vast majority of patents. These results have important implications for R&amp;D public policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economics","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 105157"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272724000938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous work suggests that research and development (R&D) tax credits increase R&D expenditure. We exploit the staggered adoption of state-level R&D tax credits in the United States to examine their effect on innovation itself. In particular, we consider ten commonly-studied patent characteristics that have received little or no attention in the extant literature on R&D incentives. Our empirical approach suggests that R&D tax credits reduce the user cost of R&D and increase R&D expenditure, but we find no aggregate evidence that such credits increase patenting in credit-adopting states. Nor do credits increase the scientific quality of patents, as captured by patent citations. On the other hand, R&D tax credits increase patent novelty and we see large and significant increases in the market value of patents in credit-adopting states. All of our aggregate results are driven by states with larger effective credits and by larger firms, because such firms produce the vast majority of patents. These results have important implications for R&D public policy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发税收抵免与创新
以往的研究表明,研发税收抵免会增加研发支出。我们利用美国交错采用州级研究与开发税收抵免的情况,研究其对创新本身的影响。特别是,我们考虑了十项通常被研究的专利特征,这些特征在有关研发激励措施的现有文献中很少或根本没有得到关注。我们的实证方法表明,研发税收抵免降低了研发的用户成本,增加了研发支出,但我们没有发现任何综合证据表明,在采用税收抵免的州,这种抵免增加了专利申请。信贷也没有提高专利的科学质量(如专利引用率)。另一方面,研究与开发税收抵免提高了专利的新颖性,我们发现在采用抵免的州,专利的市场价值有了大幅显著提高。我们的所有综合结果都是由有效抵免额度较大的州和规模较大的企业推动的,因为这些企业生产了绝大多数专利。这些结果对研发公共政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Economics aims to promote original scientific research in the field of public economics, focusing on the utilization of contemporary economic theory and quantitative analysis methodologies. It serves as a platform for the international scholarly community to engage in discussions on public policy matters.
期刊最新文献
Who truly bears (bank) taxes? Evidence from only shifting statutory incidence From viewers to voters: Tracing Fox News’ impact on American democracy All is not lost: Organized crime and social capital formation Editorial Board Income shocks, political support and voting behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1