Jared Watson , Francesca Valsesia , Shoshana Segal
{"title":"Assessing AI receptivity through a persuasion knowledge lens","authors":"Jared Watson , Francesca Valsesia , Shoshana Segal","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding human-artificial intelligence (AI) interactions is a growing academic interest. This article conceptualizes AI as a persuasion agent and reviews the recent literature on AI through the lens of persuasion knowledge. It presents research on AI acceptance and aversion in terms of the properties of the AI itself (e.g., anthropomorphism, functionality, and usability), the properties of individuals interacting with AI (e.g., individual differences in judgments of AI, perceived uniqueness, and task performance), and the context of the interaction (e.g., type of decision, domain, and usage occasion). In assessing AI interaction research through this lens, we systematically categorize these findings and identify promising future research directions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101834"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding human-artificial intelligence (AI) interactions is a growing academic interest. This article conceptualizes AI as a persuasion agent and reviews the recent literature on AI through the lens of persuasion knowledge. It presents research on AI acceptance and aversion in terms of the properties of the AI itself (e.g., anthropomorphism, functionality, and usability), the properties of individuals interacting with AI (e.g., individual differences in judgments of AI, perceived uniqueness, and task performance), and the context of the interaction (e.g., type of decision, domain, and usage occasion). In assessing AI interaction research through this lens, we systematically categorize these findings and identify promising future research directions.
期刊介绍：
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
