Thermo-economic multi-objective optimisation of a solar cooling system

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114656
A. Barac , M. Živić , Z. Virag , M. Vujanović
{"title":"Thermo-economic multi-objective optimisation of a solar cooling system","authors":"A. Barac ,&nbsp;M. Živić ,&nbsp;Z. Virag ,&nbsp;M. Vujanović","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A solar cooling system that combines the organic Rankine cycle and vapour compression refrigeration cycle, sharing the same working fluid and condenser, was optimised in terms of the total investment cost and payback period. A comprehensive thermo-economic model includes the optimal sizing of compact heat exchangers according to manufacturer's recommendations. Among the four considered working fluids, the system using R152a exhibited the highest solar energy conversion efficiency of 5.66 %, significantly lower that of a photovoltaic system. By optimising the system to minimise the number of solar thermal collectors required to meet the energy demand for achieving a cooling power of 7.3 kW, the total investment cost and payback period amounted to 13,740 EUR and 30 years, respectively. Such a system is unprofitable without considering the utilisation of waste heat from the condenser. The main drawback of using a single fluid in considered solar cooling system is the conflict requirements for working fluids in the two cycles. The best choice of working fluid for one cycle is not favourable for other one. The working fluid must be chosen from a group of working fluids more suitable for vapour compression refrigeration cycle, which is an unfavourable selection for the organic Rankine cycle resulting in the reduced solar energy conversion efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124003824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A solar cooling system that combines the organic Rankine cycle and vapour compression refrigeration cycle, sharing the same working fluid and condenser, was optimised in terms of the total investment cost and payback period. A comprehensive thermo-economic model includes the optimal sizing of compact heat exchangers according to manufacturer's recommendations. Among the four considered working fluids, the system using R152a exhibited the highest solar energy conversion efficiency of 5.66 %, significantly lower that of a photovoltaic system. By optimising the system to minimise the number of solar thermal collectors required to meet the energy demand for achieving a cooling power of 7.3 kW, the total investment cost and payback period amounted to 13,740 EUR and 30 years, respectively. Such a system is unprofitable without considering the utilisation of waste heat from the condenser. The main drawback of using a single fluid in considered solar cooling system is the conflict requirements for working fluids in the two cycles. The best choice of working fluid for one cycle is not favourable for other one. The working fluid must be chosen from a group of working fluids more suitable for vapour compression refrigeration cycle, which is an unfavourable selection for the organic Rankine cycle resulting in the reduced solar energy conversion efficiency.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
太阳能冷却系统的热经济多目标优化
从总投资成本和投资回收期的角度,对结合了有机朗肯循环和蒸汽压缩制冷循环的太阳能制冷系统进行了优化,该系统共用相同的工作流体和冷凝器。综合热经济模型包括根据制造商的建议优化紧凑型热交换器的尺寸。在所考虑的四种工作流体中,使用 R152a 的系统太阳能转换效率最高,为 5.66%,明显低于光伏系统。通过优化系统,最大限度地减少太阳能集热器的数量,以满足 7.3 千瓦制冷功率的能源需求,总投资成本和投资回收期分别为 13 740 欧元和 30 年。如果不考虑利用冷凝器的余热,这样的系统是无利可图的。在太阳能冷却系统中使用单一流体的主要缺点是两个循环中对工作流体的要求存在冲突。一个循环中工作流体的最佳选择对另一个循环不利。工作流体必须从一组更适合蒸汽压缩制冷循环的工作流体中选择,这对有机朗肯循环不利,导致太阳能转换效率降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of India's Green Hydrogen Mission and environmental impact Energy poverty and health in Turkey: Evidence from Longitudinal data Integrated heat pump with phase change materials for space heating Available solar resources and photovoltaic system planning strategy for highway Electric vehicles' impact on energy balance: Three-country comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1