Systematic examination of energy performance gap in low-energy buildings

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114701
Yefei Bai, Cong Yu, Wei Pan
{"title":"Systematic examination of energy performance gap in low-energy buildings","authors":"Yefei Bai,&nbsp;Cong Yu,&nbsp;Wei Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Low-energy buildings (LEBs) play an important role in improving energy efficiency, reducing energy use, and mitigating carbon emissions to achieve the 2050 global decarbonisation target. However, increasing evidence indicates that energy performance gap (EPG), defined as the difference between predicted and actual energy performance, significantly inhibits the successful delivery of LEBs. This study aims to systematically examine EPG in the context of LEBs using the combination of the methods of literature review and meta-analysis with 76 carefully selected cases of LEBs from previous studies. Drawing on the dialectical system theory, the study develops a novel dialectical system framework to ensure the systematicity and comprehensiveness of the examination of EPG in LEBs. A new life cycle–human–technology–organisation framework is also established to clarify the complex causes of the EPG. The findings reveal that EPG in LEBs ranges from −86 % to +483 % with an average of +58 %. More than 80 % of the LEBs have a positive gap that their actual energy consumption is greater than their predicted energy consumption. It is found that technology-related and human-related causes of EPG have been popularly investigated, but organisation-related causes have been far inadequately explored. A roadmap for pursuing zero-energy gap is proposed to promote the successful delivery of LEBs. Knowledge gaps are identified, which point future research directions for achieving a systematic understanding of EPG in LEBs, bridging the EPG, and realising LEBs effectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124004271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-energy buildings (LEBs) play an important role in improving energy efficiency, reducing energy use, and mitigating carbon emissions to achieve the 2050 global decarbonisation target. However, increasing evidence indicates that energy performance gap (EPG), defined as the difference between predicted and actual energy performance, significantly inhibits the successful delivery of LEBs. This study aims to systematically examine EPG in the context of LEBs using the combination of the methods of literature review and meta-analysis with 76 carefully selected cases of LEBs from previous studies. Drawing on the dialectical system theory, the study develops a novel dialectical system framework to ensure the systematicity and comprehensiveness of the examination of EPG in LEBs. A new life cycle–human–technology–organisation framework is also established to clarify the complex causes of the EPG. The findings reveal that EPG in LEBs ranges from −86 % to +483 % with an average of +58 %. More than 80 % of the LEBs have a positive gap that their actual energy consumption is greater than their predicted energy consumption. It is found that technology-related and human-related causes of EPG have been popularly investigated, but organisation-related causes have been far inadequately explored. A roadmap for pursuing zero-energy gap is proposed to promote the successful delivery of LEBs. Knowledge gaps are identified, which point future research directions for achieving a systematic understanding of EPG in LEBs, bridging the EPG, and realising LEBs effectively.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统检查低能耗建筑的能效差距
低能耗建筑(LEBs)在提高能源效率、减少能源使用和降低碳排放以实现 2050 年全球去碳化目标方面发挥着重要作用。然而,越来越多的证据表明,能源性能差距(EPG),即预测能源性能与实际能源性能之间的差异,极大地阻碍了低能耗建筑的成功交付。本研究采用文献综述和荟萃分析相结合的方法,从以往的研究中精心挑选了 76 个 LEB 案例,旨在系统地研究 LEB 背景下的 EPG。本研究借鉴辩证系统理论,建立了一个新颖的辩证系统框架,以确保对 LEB 中 EPG 研究的系统性和全面性。研究还建立了一个新的生命周期--人--技术--组织框架,以阐明 EPG 的复杂成因。研究结果表明,LEB 中的 EPG 从 -86 % 到 +483 % 不等,平均为 +58 %。超过 80% 的低能耗机构存在正差距,即实际能耗大于预测能耗。研究发现,与技术和人为相关的 EPG 原因已得到广泛研究,但与组织相关的原因还远未得到充分探讨。本文提出了一个追求零能耗差距的路线图,以促进 LEB 的成功实施。同时还指出了知识差距,为系统了解低能耗建筑中的能耗差距、弥合能耗差距和有效实现低能耗建筑指明了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of India's Green Hydrogen Mission and environmental impact Energy poverty and health in Turkey: Evidence from Longitudinal data Integrated heat pump with phase change materials for space heating Available solar resources and photovoltaic system planning strategy for highway Electric vehicles' impact on energy balance: Three-country comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1