Effects of standardization in risk management regulations for land-use planning related to process industries and transportation of dangerous goods

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105383
Johan Ingvarson
{"title":"Effects of standardization in risk management regulations for land-use planning related to process industries and transportation of dangerous goods","authors":"Johan Ingvarson","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preventing and mitigating damage to the surroundings arising from process safety incidents is an important aspect of process safety. Risk-informed or risk-based decision-making are cornerstones in most countries’ regulatory regimes for land-use planning. However, the design and implementation of the regulations vary significantly - from countries that have chosen a highly standardized set of rules prescribing detailed technical solutions to less standardized regulations with functional requirements that focus on what is to be achieved rather than how it is achieved. There are strengths and weaknesses associated with risk management regulations being more or less standardized, but empirical evidence favouring high or low levels of standardization is largely lacking. Through interviews with 30 risk management practitioners from three countries (Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands), this paper provides empirical data on the effects of different risk management regulatory regimes. Using CIMO-logic (Context – Intervention – Mechanism – Outcome) to facilitate and structure data analysis, this paper also explores the underlying mechanisms contributing to achieving the effects. The study shows that the perceived effects of standardization of risk management regulations are similar irrespective of respondents’ attributes, such as work country, current and previous roles, education level, years of experience, or gender. Similarly, there are no clear trends in the data or in scientific literature that specific effects are exclusively the results of high or low levels of standardization. The effects of standardization are highly contextual, and the balance of benefits and shortcomings of specific regulatory regimes should be explored in each situation. Hence, it cannot be concluded that high or low levels of standardization of risk management regulations should be preferred</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024001414/pdfft?md5=b011e05201b082c2a8eec5ce5d023f05&pid=1-s2.0-S0950423024001414-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024001414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preventing and mitigating damage to the surroundings arising from process safety incidents is an important aspect of process safety. Risk-informed or risk-based decision-making are cornerstones in most countries’ regulatory regimes for land-use planning. However, the design and implementation of the regulations vary significantly - from countries that have chosen a highly standardized set of rules prescribing detailed technical solutions to less standardized regulations with functional requirements that focus on what is to be achieved rather than how it is achieved. There are strengths and weaknesses associated with risk management regulations being more or less standardized, but empirical evidence favouring high or low levels of standardization is largely lacking. Through interviews with 30 risk management practitioners from three countries (Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands), this paper provides empirical data on the effects of different risk management regulatory regimes. Using CIMO-logic (Context – Intervention – Mechanism – Outcome) to facilitate and structure data analysis, this paper also explores the underlying mechanisms contributing to achieving the effects. The study shows that the perceived effects of standardization of risk management regulations are similar irrespective of respondents’ attributes, such as work country, current and previous roles, education level, years of experience, or gender. Similarly, there are no clear trends in the data or in scientific literature that specific effects are exclusively the results of high or low levels of standardization. The effects of standardization are highly contextual, and the balance of benefits and shortcomings of specific regulatory regimes should be explored in each situation. Hence, it cannot be concluded that high or low levels of standardization of risk management regulations should be preferred

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与加工工业和危险货物运输有关的土地使用规划风险管理规章标准化的影响
防止和减轻工艺安全事故对周围环境造成的破坏是工艺安全的一个重要方面。风险知情或基于风险的决策是大多数国家土地使用规划监管制度的基石。然而,法规的设计和实施却大相径庭--有的国家选择了一套高度标准化的规则,规定了详细的技术解决方案;有的国家则选择了标准化程度较低的法规,提出了功能性要求,重点是要实现什么,而不是如何实现。风险管理规章的标准化程度有高有低,各有长处和短处,但标准化程度有高有低的实证证据还很缺乏。本文通过对来自三个国家(瑞典、挪威和荷兰)的 30 名风险管理从业人员进行访谈,提供了有关不同风险管理监管制度效果的实证数据。本文采用 CIMO-逻辑(背景-干预-机制-结果)来促进和组织数据分析,同时还探讨了实现效果的潜在机制。研究表明,无论受访者的属性如何,如工作国家、目前和以前的角色、教育水平、工作年限或性别,他们对风险管理规章标准化效果的认知都是相似的。同样,数据或科学文献中也没有明显的趋势表明,特定的效果完全是标准化程度高或低的结果。标准化的效果与具体情况密切相关,应根据具体情况探讨具体监管制度的利弊平衡。因此,不能断定风险管理规章的标准化程度越高越好或越低越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
Research on the diffusion and control of unsafe behaviors among chemical industry park enterprises based on the SEIR evolutionary game model Experimental study on hydrogen pipeline leakage: Negative pressure wave characteristics and inline detection method A dynamic system reliability analysis model on safety instrumented systems Effect of ambient pressure on the fire characteristics of lithium-ion battery energy storage container Incident investigation of hydrogen explosion and fire in a residue desulfurization process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1