Low androgen/progesterone or high oestrogen/androgen receptors ratio in serous ovarian cancer predicts longer survival

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100917
Justyna Gogola-Mruk , Miłosz Pietrus , Maryla Piechowicz , Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska , Paulina Głód , Agnieszka Wolnicka-Glubisz , Joanna Szpor , Anna Ptak
{"title":"Low androgen/progesterone or high oestrogen/androgen receptors ratio in serous ovarian cancer predicts longer survival","authors":"Justyna Gogola-Mruk ,&nbsp;Miłosz Pietrus ,&nbsp;Maryla Piechowicz ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska ,&nbsp;Paulina Głód ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Wolnicka-Glubisz ,&nbsp;Joanna Szpor ,&nbsp;Anna Ptak","doi":"10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) remains one of the greatest challenges in gynaecological oncology. The presence of classic steroid receptors in OC makes hormone therapy an attractive option; however, the response of OC to hormone therapy is modest. Here, we compared the expression patterns of progesterone (PGR), androgen (AR) and oestrogen alpha (ERα) receptors between serous OC cell lines and non-cancer ovarian cells. These data were analysed in relation to steroid receptor expression profiles from patient tumour samples and survival outcomes using a bioinformatics approach. The results showed that ERα, PGR and AR were co-expressed in OC cell lines, and patient samples from high-grade and low-grade OC co-expressed at least two steroid receptors. High AR expression was negatively correlated, whereas ERα and PGR expression was positively correlated with patient survival. AR showed the opposite expression pattern to that of ERα and PGR in type 1 (SKOV-3) and 2 (OVCAR-3) OC cell lines compared with non-cancer (HOSEpiC) ovarian cells, with AR downregulated in type 1 and upregulated in type 2 OC. A low AR/PGR ratio and a high ESR1/AR ratio were associated with favourable survival outcomes in OC compared with other receptor ratios. Although the results must be interpreted with caution because of the small number of primary tumour samples analysed, they nevertheless suggest that the evaluation of ERα, AR and PGR by immunohistochemistry should be performed in patient biological material to plan future clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642431X24000639/pdfft?md5=732e5472dfe8d015b52e9fa84e3942c5&pid=1-s2.0-S1642431X24000639-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642431X24000639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) remains one of the greatest challenges in gynaecological oncology. The presence of classic steroid receptors in OC makes hormone therapy an attractive option; however, the response of OC to hormone therapy is modest. Here, we compared the expression patterns of progesterone (PGR), androgen (AR) and oestrogen alpha (ERα) receptors between serous OC cell lines and non-cancer ovarian cells. These data were analysed in relation to steroid receptor expression profiles from patient tumour samples and survival outcomes using a bioinformatics approach. The results showed that ERα, PGR and AR were co-expressed in OC cell lines, and patient samples from high-grade and low-grade OC co-expressed at least two steroid receptors. High AR expression was negatively correlated, whereas ERα and PGR expression was positively correlated with patient survival. AR showed the opposite expression pattern to that of ERα and PGR in type 1 (SKOV-3) and 2 (OVCAR-3) OC cell lines compared with non-cancer (HOSEpiC) ovarian cells, with AR downregulated in type 1 and upregulated in type 2 OC. A low AR/PGR ratio and a high ESR1/AR ratio were associated with favourable survival outcomes in OC compared with other receptor ratios. Although the results must be interpreted with caution because of the small number of primary tumour samples analysed, they nevertheless suggest that the evaluation of ERα, AR and PGR by immunohistochemistry should be performed in patient biological material to plan future clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浆液性卵巢癌中低雄激素/孕激素或高雌激素/雄激素受体比值可预测更长的生存期
卵巢癌(OC)的治疗仍然是妇科肿瘤学面临的最大挑战之一。卵巢癌中存在典型的类固醇受体,这使得激素治疗成为一种有吸引力的选择;然而,卵巢癌对激素治疗的反应并不明显。在这里,我们比较了浆液性卵巢癌细胞系和非癌卵巢细胞中黄体酮(PGR)、雄激素(AR)和雌激素α(ERα)受体的表达模式。研究人员采用生物信息学方法,结合患者肿瘤样本中类固醇受体的表达谱和生存结果,对这些数据进行了分析。结果显示,ERα、PGR和AR在卵巢癌细胞系中共同表达,高级别和低级别卵巢癌患者样本至少共同表达两种类固醇受体。AR的高表达与患者存活率呈负相关,而ERα和PGR的表达与患者存活率呈正相关。与非癌症(HOSEpiC)卵巢细胞相比,AR在1型(SKOV-3)和2型(OVCAR-3)OC细胞系中的表达模式与ERα和PGR相反,AR在1型OC中下调,而在2型OC中上调。与其他受体比值相比,低AR/PGR比值和高ESR1/AR比值与OC的有利生存结果相关。尽管由于分析的原发肿瘤样本数量较少,因此必须谨慎解释这些结果,但它们表明,应通过免疫组化方法对患者生物材料中的ERα、AR和PGR进行评估,以规划未来的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1