Segmented Trust Assessment in Autonomous Vehicles via Eye-Tracking

Miklós Lukovics;Szabolcs Prónay;Barbara Nagy
{"title":"Segmented Trust Assessment in Autonomous Vehicles via Eye-Tracking","authors":"Miklós Lukovics;Szabolcs Prónay;Barbara Nagy","doi":"10.26599/JICV.2023.9210037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have identified trust as one of the key factors in the technology acceptance of autonomous vehicles. As these studies mostly investigated the population in general, little is known about segment-specific differences. Furthermore, the widely used survey methods are less able to capture the deeper forms of trust—which neuroscientific methods are much better suited to capture. The main objective of our research is to study trust as one of the key factors of technology acceptance related to autonomous vehicles by using neuroscientific methods for specific consumer segments. Real-time eye-tracking tests were applied to a sample of 113 participants, combined with a posttest self-report. The tests were carried out under laboratory conditions during which our subjects watched videos recorded with the internal cameras of autonomous vehicles. Based on the fixation count, total fixation duration, and pupil dilation, we empirically verified that the trust level of all five identified segments is relatively low, while the trust level of the “traditional rejecting” segment is the lowest. An increase in trust level can be shown if the subjects receive extra information about the journey. Another important finding is that the self-reported trust level is not always congruent with the eye-tracking analysis results; therefore, combined approaches can lead to greater measurement validity.","PeriodicalId":100793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles","volume":"7 2","pages":"151-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10586910","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10586910/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have identified trust as one of the key factors in the technology acceptance of autonomous vehicles. As these studies mostly investigated the population in general, little is known about segment-specific differences. Furthermore, the widely used survey methods are less able to capture the deeper forms of trust—which neuroscientific methods are much better suited to capture. The main objective of our research is to study trust as one of the key factors of technology acceptance related to autonomous vehicles by using neuroscientific methods for specific consumer segments. Real-time eye-tracking tests were applied to a sample of 113 participants, combined with a posttest self-report. The tests were carried out under laboratory conditions during which our subjects watched videos recorded with the internal cameras of autonomous vehicles. Based on the fixation count, total fixation duration, and pupil dilation, we empirically verified that the trust level of all five identified segments is relatively low, while the trust level of the “traditional rejecting” segment is the lowest. An increase in trust level can be shown if the subjects receive extra information about the journey. Another important finding is that the self-reported trust level is not always congruent with the eye-tracking analysis results; therefore, combined approaches can lead to greater measurement validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过眼球跟踪对自动驾驶汽车进行分段信任评估
以往的研究认为,信任是自动驾驶汽车技术接受度的关键因素之一。由于这些研究大多调查的是一般人群,因此对特定群体的差异知之甚少。此外,广泛使用的调查方法不太能够捕捉到更深层次的信任--而神经科学方法更适合捕捉这种信任。我们研究的主要目的是通过神经科学方法,针对特定的消费者群体,研究作为自动驾驶汽车相关技术接受度关键因素之一的信任度。我们对 113 名参与者进行了实时眼动跟踪测试,并结合了测试后的自我报告。测试在实验室条件下进行,期间受试者观看了自动驾驶汽车内部摄像头录制的视频。根据定格次数、总定格时间和瞳孔放大情况,我们通过实证验证了所有五个已识别片段的信任度都相对较低,而 "传统拒绝 "片段的信任度最低。如果受试者获得有关旅程的额外信息,信任度就会提高。另一个重要发现是,自我报告的信任度与眼动跟踪分析结果并不总是一致的;因此,综合方法可以提高测量的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Cover Contents Advancements and Prospects in Multisensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving Extracting Networkwide Road Segment Location, Direction, and Turning Movement Rules From Global Positioning System Vehicle Trajectory Data for Macrosimulation Decision Making and Control of Autonomous Vehicles Under the Condition of Front Vehicle Sideslip
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1