Patterns of physical activity of people with COPD during participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation program.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107724
Joshua A. Bishop , Lissa M. Spencer , Tiffany J. Dwyer , Zoe J. McKeough , Amanda McAnulty , Sonia Cheng , Jennifer A. Alison
{"title":"Patterns of physical activity of people with COPD during participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation program.","authors":"Joshua A. Bishop ,&nbsp;Lissa M. Spencer ,&nbsp;Tiffany J. Dwyer ,&nbsp;Zoe J. McKeough ,&nbsp;Amanda McAnulty ,&nbsp;Sonia Cheng ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Alison","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Very few studies have examined patterns of physical activity (PA) during a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program in people with COPD.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To compare the patterns of PA in: 1) the week before commencing PR (pre-PR) with a week during PR (PR week); 2) PR days and non-PR days during a PR week; 3) pre-PR and the week following PR completion (post PR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Participants attended twice weekly supervised PR for 8-12 weeks. Daily step count (primary outcome), time in light activities, time in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), total sedentary time and sit-to-stand (STS) transitions were measured using a thigh worn accelerometer for seven days, at each assessment time point: pre-PR, PR week and post PR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>29 participants, mean age (SD) 69years(7), FEV<sub>1</sub> 53%pred(16). The PR week compared to pre-PR, showed higher daily: step count (mean difference (95%CI)), 941steps(388–1494); and MVPA, 11mins(6–15), with no difference in: time in light activities, -1min(-6–5); total sedentary time, 7mins(-21–36); or STS transitions, 0(-5–6). PR days compared to non-PR days showed higher: step count, 2810steps(1706–3913); time in light activities 11mins(1–20); time in MVPA, 27mins(17–35) and STS transitions, 8(4–12), with no difference in total sedentary time: -33mins(-80–15). There were no differences in any PA measures post-PR compared to pre-PR (p&lt;0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Daily step count and time spent in MVPA increased significantly during the PR week, solely due to increased PA on days participants attended PR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124001999/pdfft?md5=0ca08940eececdbd7e32531997765516&pid=1-s2.0-S0954611124001999-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124001999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Very few studies have examined patterns of physical activity (PA) during a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program in people with COPD.

Aims

To compare the patterns of PA in: 1) the week before commencing PR (pre-PR) with a week during PR (PR week); 2) PR days and non-PR days during a PR week; 3) pre-PR and the week following PR completion (post PR).

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Participants attended twice weekly supervised PR for 8-12 weeks. Daily step count (primary outcome), time in light activities, time in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), total sedentary time and sit-to-stand (STS) transitions were measured using a thigh worn accelerometer for seven days, at each assessment time point: pre-PR, PR week and post PR.

Results

29 participants, mean age (SD) 69years(7), FEV1 53%pred(16). The PR week compared to pre-PR, showed higher daily: step count (mean difference (95%CI)), 941steps(388–1494); and MVPA, 11mins(6–15), with no difference in: time in light activities, -1min(-6–5); total sedentary time, 7mins(-21–36); or STS transitions, 0(-5–6). PR days compared to non-PR days showed higher: step count, 2810steps(1706–3913); time in light activities 11mins(1–20); time in MVPA, 27mins(17–35) and STS transitions, 8(4–12), with no difference in total sedentary time: -33mins(-80–15). There were no differences in any PA measures post-PR compared to pre-PR (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Daily step count and time spent in MVPA increased significantly during the PR week, solely due to increased PA on days participants attended PR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病患者在参加肺康复计划期间的体育活动模式。
导言:很少有研究对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者在肺康复(PR)计划期间的体育活动(PA)模式进行研究:1) 开始肺康复计划前一周(肺康复计划前)与肺康复计划期间一周(肺康复计划期间一周);2) 肺康复计划期间一周中的肺康复计划日与非肺康复计划日;3) 肺康复计划前一周与肺康复计划结束后一周(肺康复计划结束后):这是一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究。参与者在 8-12 周内每周参加两次有监督的 PR。在每个评估时间点:PR 前、PR 周和 PR 后,使用佩戴在大腿上的加速度计测量七天的每日步数(主要结果)、轻度活动时间、中度至剧烈活动时间(MVPA)、总久坐时间和从坐到站(STS)转换。与 PR 前相比,PR 周显示出更高的每日:步数(平均差异(95%CI)),941 步(388-1494);MVPA,11 分钟(6-15),而在以下方面没有差异:轻度活动时间,-1 分钟(-6-5);总久坐时间,7 分钟(-21-36);或 STS 过渡,0(-5-6)。与非 PR 日相比,PR 日的以下指标更高:步数,2810 步(1706-3913);轻度活动时间,11 分钟(1-20);MVPA 时间,27 分钟(17-35);STS 过渡时间,8 分钟(4-12),而总久坐时间没有差异:-33 分钟(-80-15)。PR后与PR前相比,任何PA测量结果均无差异(p结论:在 PR 周期间,每日步数和 MVPA 所花费的时间显著增加,这完全是由于参与者在参加 PR 的日子里增加了 PA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the acceptability of the changing model of care in cystic fibrosis Efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease and exercise pulmonary hypertension Epistaxis in COVID positive ICU patients, implications, and future interventions Prognostic Role of Pleural Fluid SUVpeak Value obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion. β-Blockers and Asthma: Surprising findings from the FAERS database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1