Does Twitter Data Mirror the European North–South Family Ties Divide? A Comparative Analysis of Tweets About Family

IF 2.6 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Population Research and Policy Review Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s11113-024-09891-6
Sofia Gil-Clavel, Clara H. Mulder
{"title":"Does Twitter Data Mirror the European North–South Family Ties Divide? A Comparative Analysis of Tweets About Family","authors":"Sofia Gil-Clavel, Clara H. Mulder","doi":"10.1007/s11113-024-09891-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research on the relationship between geographical distance and the frequency of contact between family members has shown that the strength of family ties differs between Northern and Southern Europe. However, little is known about how family ties are reflected in peoples’ conversations on social media, despite research showing the relevance of social media data for understanding users’ daily expressions of emotions and thoughts based on their immediate experiences. This work investigates the question of whether Twitter use patterns in Europe mirror the North–South divide in the strength of family ties by analyzing potential differences in family-related tweets between users in Northern and Southern European countries. This study relies on a longitudinal database derived from Twitter collected between January 2012 and December 2016. We perform a comparative analysis of Southern and Northern European users’ tweets using Bayesian generalized multilevel models together with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software. We analyze the association between regional differences in the strength of family ties and patterns of tweeting about family. Results show that the North–South divide is reflected in the frequency of tweets that are about family, that refer to family in the past versus in the present tense, and that are about close versus extended family.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09891-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research on the relationship between geographical distance and the frequency of contact between family members has shown that the strength of family ties differs between Northern and Southern Europe. However, little is known about how family ties are reflected in peoples’ conversations on social media, despite research showing the relevance of social media data for understanding users’ daily expressions of emotions and thoughts based on their immediate experiences. This work investigates the question of whether Twitter use patterns in Europe mirror the North–South divide in the strength of family ties by analyzing potential differences in family-related tweets between users in Northern and Southern European countries. This study relies on a longitudinal database derived from Twitter collected between January 2012 and December 2016. We perform a comparative analysis of Southern and Northern European users’ tweets using Bayesian generalized multilevel models together with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software. We analyze the association between regional differences in the strength of family ties and patterns of tweeting about family. Results show that the North–South divide is reflected in the frequency of tweets that are about family, that refer to family in the past versus in the present tense, and that are about close versus extended family.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特数据是否反映了欧洲南北家庭纽带的鸿沟?关于家庭的推文比较分析
以往关于地理距离与家庭成员之间联系频率之间关系的研究表明,北欧和南欧的家庭联系强度不同。然而,尽管有研究表明社交媒体数据对于了解用户基于其切身经历的日常情感和思想表达具有重要意义,但人们对人们在社交媒体上的谈话如何反映家庭纽带却知之甚少。本研究通过分析北欧和南欧国家用户在家庭相关推文中的潜在差异,探讨了欧洲的推特使用模式是否反映了家庭纽带强度的南北差异。本研究依赖于 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间从 Twitter 收集的纵向数据库。我们使用贝叶斯广义多层次模型,并结合 Linguistic Inquiry 和 Word Count 软件,对南欧和北欧用户的推文进行了比较分析。我们分析了家庭纽带强度的地区差异与有关家庭的推文模式之间的关联。结果显示,南北差异体现在关于家庭的推文频率、过去时与现在时提及家庭的频率、以及关于近亲与大家庭的推文频率上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
期刊最新文献
Realization of Short-Term Fertility Intentions in a Comparative Perspective: Which Macro-Level Conditions Matter? Perceived Spousal Concordance on Desired Family Size and Birth Intendedness Among Second and Higher-Order Births in Pakistan Health Care Access Among Children in Latinx Families Across U.S. Destinations State-Level LGBTQ + Policies and Experiences of Interpersonal Discrimination among Sexual and Gender Minority People Infant Mortality in Mother and Baby Homes in 20th Century Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1