Robot NAO integrated lesson vs. traditional lesson: Measuring learning outcomes on the topic of “societal change” and the mediating effect of students' attitudes

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH British Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1111/bjet.13501
Violeta Rosanda, Ivan Bratko, Mateja Gačnik, Vid Podpečan, Andreja Istenič
{"title":"Robot NAO integrated lesson vs. traditional lesson: Measuring learning outcomes on the topic of “societal change” and the mediating effect of students' attitudes","authors":"Violeta Rosanda, Ivan Bratko, Mateja Gačnik, Vid Podpečan, Andreja Istenič","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our research aims to examine the effectiveness of introducing social robots as educational technology within authentic classroom activities without modifying them to be designed for a robot. We chose as test subject the fifth‐grade curricular topic “<jats:italic>The role of technology and its impact on society</jats:italic>”, meeting the critical stage of moral development students aged of 11–12. The study, with both experimental (EG) and control groups (CG), will be conducted over 6 weeks. This study will examine the impact of robot‐supported lessons with post‐participation testing on learning outcomes and examine students' perception of the robot in the classroom as a potential correlation with academic performance. The form of the study will be a between‐group non‐randomised controlled experiment. Control and experimental groups will be matched concerning gender, mastery of technology and previous knowledge and understanding of the curricular topic in focus. The instructional design of process‐outcome strategies will incorporate all of Bloom's taxonomic levels. In the review of related studies, we identified gaps in social robot‐supported lessons within the regular curriculum between‐group experiment. Based on a review of related research showing more focus on robot performance in the classroom from technical‐interaction aspects we want to convey from pedagogical starting point. The robot's placement in the pedagogical process will be considered an integral part of the teacher's technical environment. We will use the pre‐participation test to establish whether there is the initial equivalence between EG and CG in terms of gender, mastery of technology, and previous knowledge and understanding of the curricular topic under examination.","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13501","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our research aims to examine the effectiveness of introducing social robots as educational technology within authentic classroom activities without modifying them to be designed for a robot. We chose as test subject the fifth‐grade curricular topic “The role of technology and its impact on society”, meeting the critical stage of moral development students aged of 11–12. The study, with both experimental (EG) and control groups (CG), will be conducted over 6 weeks. This study will examine the impact of robot‐supported lessons with post‐participation testing on learning outcomes and examine students' perception of the robot in the classroom as a potential correlation with academic performance. The form of the study will be a between‐group non‐randomised controlled experiment. Control and experimental groups will be matched concerning gender, mastery of technology and previous knowledge and understanding of the curricular topic in focus. The instructional design of process‐outcome strategies will incorporate all of Bloom's taxonomic levels. In the review of related studies, we identified gaps in social robot‐supported lessons within the regular curriculum between‐group experiment. Based on a review of related research showing more focus on robot performance in the classroom from technical‐interaction aspects we want to convey from pedagogical starting point. The robot's placement in the pedagogical process will be considered an integral part of the teacher's technical environment. We will use the pre‐participation test to establish whether there is the initial equivalence between EG and CG in terms of gender, mastery of technology, and previous knowledge and understanding of the curricular topic under examination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人 NAO 综合课与传统课:衡量 "社会变革 "主题的学习成果以及学生态度的中介效应
我们的研究旨在考察在真实的课堂活动中引入社交机器人作为教育技术的有效性,而不对这些活动进行为机器人而设计的修改。我们选择了五年级的课程主题 "技术的作用及其对社会的影响 "作为测试对象,以满足 11-12 岁学生道德发展的关键阶段。这项研究将分实验组(EG)和对照组(CG)进行,为期 6 周。本研究将通过参与后测试,考察机器人辅助课程对学习成果的影响,并考察学生对课堂上机器人的看法,因为这可能与学习成绩相关。研究形式为组间非随机对照实验。对照组和实验组将在性别、技术掌握程度以及先前对重点课程主题的知识和理解方面进行匹配。过程-结果策略的教学设计将包含布卢姆分类学的所有层次。在对相关研究的回顾中,我们发现了在常规课程组间实验中社交机器人辅助课程的不足。在回顾相关研究的基础上,我们希望从教学的角度出发,从技术互动的角度出发,更多地关注机器人在课堂上的表现。机器人在教学过程中的位置将被视为教师技术环境的一个组成部分。我们将通过参与前测试来确定 EG 和 CG 在性别、技术掌握程度、先前知识以及对所考察课程主题的理解方面是否存在初始等同性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A multimodal approach to support teacher, researcher and AI collaboration in STEM+C learning environments Exploring Twitter as a social learning space for education scholars: An analysis of value‐added contributions to the #TPACK network Youths' relationship with culture: Tracing sixth graders' learning through designing culturally centred multimedia projects Seeking to support preservice teachers' responsive teaching: Leveraging artificial intelligence‐supported virtual simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1