{"title":"Syntactic knowledge in a foreign language: examining cross-language transfer effects in L2 noun phrase comprehension","authors":"Ayelet Sasson, Rachel Schiff, Barak Zluf","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10569-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed the effect of adjectives and noun premodifiers on L2 noun phrase comprehension and error types among English Language Learners. We also examined the correlation between L2 noun phrase comprehension and L2 reading comprehension, as well as the contribution of L2 noun phrase comprehension to L2 reading comprehension. One hundred and one Hebrew-speaking 11th graders were tested on the English noun phrase comprehension task, indexing cross-language effects (from L1 to L2). The task included sentences in four conditions, each representing a different noun phrase structure at the syntactic subject position: NN, NNN, AdjNN, and AdjNNN. Participants also completed L1 reading comprehension and L2 vocabulary tests that were controlled for in the correlation and regression analyses. Overall, the results indicate that sentences with noun premodifiers and no adjective premodifiers were more challenging and more susceptible to L1 interference. Partial correlation analyses showed that participants’ performance on all four conditions of the noun phrase comprehension test was significantly and positively correlated with their L2 reading comprehension. Multiple regression analyses revealed that higher accuracy and low error rates in the NN and AdjNNN conditions made a unique contribution to L2 reading comprehension, when we controlled for L1 reading comprehension and L2 vocabulary. This study confirmed the significant effects L1 has on L2 syntactic knowledge, which relates significantly and contributes to L2 reading comprehension abilities among adolescent students.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10569-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assessed the effect of adjectives and noun premodifiers on L2 noun phrase comprehension and error types among English Language Learners. We also examined the correlation between L2 noun phrase comprehension and L2 reading comprehension, as well as the contribution of L2 noun phrase comprehension to L2 reading comprehension. One hundred and one Hebrew-speaking 11th graders were tested on the English noun phrase comprehension task, indexing cross-language effects (from L1 to L2). The task included sentences in four conditions, each representing a different noun phrase structure at the syntactic subject position: NN, NNN, AdjNN, and AdjNNN. Participants also completed L1 reading comprehension and L2 vocabulary tests that were controlled for in the correlation and regression analyses. Overall, the results indicate that sentences with noun premodifiers and no adjective premodifiers were more challenging and more susceptible to L1 interference. Partial correlation analyses showed that participants’ performance on all four conditions of the noun phrase comprehension test was significantly and positively correlated with their L2 reading comprehension. Multiple regression analyses revealed that higher accuracy and low error rates in the NN and AdjNNN conditions made a unique contribution to L2 reading comprehension, when we controlled for L1 reading comprehension and L2 vocabulary. This study confirmed the significant effects L1 has on L2 syntactic knowledge, which relates significantly and contributes to L2 reading comprehension abilities among adolescent students.
期刊介绍:
Reading and writing skills are fundamental to literacy. Consequently, the processes involved in reading and writing and the failure to acquire these skills, as well as the loss of once well-developed reading and writing abilities have been the targets of intense research activity involving professionals from a variety of disciplines, such as neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics and education. The findings that have emanated from this research are most often written up in a lingua that is specific to the particular discipline involved, and are published in specialized journals. This generally leaves the expert in one area almost totally unaware of what may be taking place in any area other than their own. Reading and Writing cuts through this fog of jargon, breaking down the artificial boundaries between disciplines. The journal focuses on the interaction among various fields, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Reading and Writing publishes high-quality, scientific articles pertaining to the processes, acquisition, and loss of reading and writing skills. The journal fully represents the necessarily interdisciplinary nature of research in the field, focusing on the interaction among various disciplines, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Coverage in Reading and Writing includes models of reading, writing and spelling at all age levels; orthography and its relation to reading and writing; computer literacy; cross-cultural studies; and developmental and acquired disorders of reading and writing. It publishes research articles, critical reviews, theoretical papers, and case studies. Reading and Writing is one of the most highly cited journals in Education, Educational Research, and Educational Psychology.