Causes and consequences of microbiome formation in mosquito larvae

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Ecological Entomology Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1111/een.13360
Cameron D. Schwing, Christopher J. Holmes, Ephantus J. Muturi, Christopher Dunlap, Jessica R. Holmes, Carla E. Cáceres
{"title":"Causes and consequences of microbiome formation in mosquito larvae","authors":"Cameron D. Schwing, Christopher J. Holmes, Ephantus J. Muturi, Christopher Dunlap, Jessica R. Holmes, Carla E. Cáceres","doi":"10.1111/een.13360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>The assembly of host‐associated microbial communities is influenced by multiple factors, but the effect of microbiomes on host phenotypes is often not well understood. To address questions of food‐web effects on host microbiome assembly, we manipulated the resource environment (grass only [G] vs. grass + nutrients [GN]), competition type (intra‐ vs. inter‐specific) and density (high vs. low) for <jats:italic>Culex restuan</jats:italic>s mosquito larvae. We predicted the microbial communities in fourth‐instar larvae would differ between these environmental treatments and that these treatments would translate into differences in the adult phenotype.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Resource environment and density influenced the larval microbiome. In addition, the larval microbiome exhibited notable differences compared to the free‐living microbial communities.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Resource‐driven differences in the larval samples can be attributed to Arcobacteraceae being more abundant in larvae reared in the GN treatments relative to those reared in the G treatments and Comamonadaceae being more abundant in the G treatment. Although significant, the difference in community structure between density treatments was difficult to discern. This appears to be driven by Weeksellaceae only being abundant in the high‐density, interspecific, GN treatment.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Rearing larvae to adulthood under severe food limitation resulted in low survival (&lt;25%) in both resource environments. Approximately 60% of survivors to adulthood were male. Larvae reared in the intraspecific, G treatment had the shortest development time to adulthood and emerged as the smallest adults.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>These results demonstrate how environmental variation can significantly alter the alpha and beta diversity of free‐living microbes, which in turn can significantly affect host phenotype and critical life history traits, such as development time, size at adulthood, and survival. These findings highlight the importance of considering environmental influences on microbiome diversity to understand and predict host outcomes, offering valuable insights for diverse applications in fields such as ecology, public health, and agriculture.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":50557,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Entomology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assembly of host‐associated microbial communities is influenced by multiple factors, but the effect of microbiomes on host phenotypes is often not well understood. To address questions of food‐web effects on host microbiome assembly, we manipulated the resource environment (grass only [G] vs. grass + nutrients [GN]), competition type (intra‐ vs. inter‐specific) and density (high vs. low) for Culex restuans mosquito larvae. We predicted the microbial communities in fourth‐instar larvae would differ between these environmental treatments and that these treatments would translate into differences in the adult phenotype. Resource environment and density influenced the larval microbiome. In addition, the larval microbiome exhibited notable differences compared to the free‐living microbial communities. Resource‐driven differences in the larval samples can be attributed to Arcobacteraceae being more abundant in larvae reared in the GN treatments relative to those reared in the G treatments and Comamonadaceae being more abundant in the G treatment. Although significant, the difference in community structure between density treatments was difficult to discern. This appears to be driven by Weeksellaceae only being abundant in the high‐density, interspecific, GN treatment. Rearing larvae to adulthood under severe food limitation resulted in low survival (<25%) in both resource environments. Approximately 60% of survivors to adulthood were male. Larvae reared in the intraspecific, G treatment had the shortest development time to adulthood and emerged as the smallest adults. These results demonstrate how environmental variation can significantly alter the alpha and beta diversity of free‐living microbes, which in turn can significantly affect host phenotype and critical life history traits, such as development time, size at adulthood, and survival. These findings highlight the importance of considering environmental influences on microbiome diversity to understand and predict host outcomes, offering valuable insights for diverse applications in fields such as ecology, public health, and agriculture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚊子幼虫体内微生物组形成的原因和后果
宿主相关微生物群落的组合受到多种因素的影响,但微生物群落对宿主表型的影响往往不甚明了。为了解决食物网对宿主微生物群落组成的影响问题,我们操纵了库蚊幼虫的资源环境(仅草[G]与草+营养物[GN])、竞争类型(种内与种间)和密度(高与低)。我们预测四龄幼虫体内的微生物群落在这些环境处理中会有所不同,而且这些处理会转化为成虫表型的差异。资源环境和密度影响了幼虫微生物群落。此外,与自由生活的微生物群落相比,幼虫微生物群落表现出明显的差异。幼虫样本中由资源驱动的差异可归因于 Arcobacteraceae 在 GN 处理中饲养的幼虫比在 G 处理中饲养的幼虫数量更多,以及 Comamonadaceae 在 G 处理中数量更多。虽然密度处理之间的群落结构差异显著,但很难辨别。这似乎是由于Weeksellaceae仅在高密度、种间、GN处理中含量丰富。在食物严重不足的情况下将幼虫饲养到成年,两种资源环境中的存活率都很低(25%)。大约 60% 的成年存活者为雄性。在种内 G 处理中饲养的幼虫发育到成虫的时间最短,成虫体型最小。这些结果表明,环境变化可显著改变自由生活微生物的α和β多样性,进而显著影响宿主表型和关键的生活史特征,如发育时间、成年体型和存活率。这些发现凸显了考虑环境对微生物组多样性的影响对理解和预测宿主结果的重要性,为生态学、公共卫生和农业等领域的各种应用提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Entomology
Ecological Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Entomology publishes top-quality original research on the ecology of insects and related invertebrate taxa. Our aim is to publish papers that will be of considerable interest to the wide community of ecologists who are motivated by ecological or evolutionary theory. The suitability of a manuscript will usually be assessed within 5 days. We publish full-length Original Articles as well as Reviews, Short Communications, Methods and Natural History papers. In Original Articles, we greatly prefer papers that test specific hypotheses and which have a high degree of novelty. All categories aim for innovative contributions that advance the subject of ecological entomology.
期刊最新文献
What determines the antipredator strategy in antlion larvae? Burrowing ability decreases the duration of post‐contact immobility Suspended resting of caterpillars as an anti‐predator strategy Fire ants mediate competition between scale insects and fruit flies High plasticity in diapause responses benefits bark beetles in a changing climate The refuse dump provides information that influences the foraging preferences of leaf‐cutting ants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1