Effectiveness and safety of coils plus glue in slope embankment technology versus coils plus sclerosant in embolization therapy for reflux-type pelvic venous disorders

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of coils plus glue (CPG) in slope embankment technology vs coils plus sclerosant (CPS) in treating reflux-type pelvic venous disorders.

Methods

The analysis included patients diagnosed with reflux-type pelvic venous disorders who were treated with CPG or CPS from 2019 to 2021. The inclusion criteria were noncyclic pain lasting more than 6 months, atypical varicose, and transvaginal Doppler ultrasound (TVDUS) and computed tomographic venography confirming the diagnosis and excluding compression factors and other diseases. Propensity score matching was performed at a 1:1.1 ratio based on the following covariates: age, pregnancy, body mass index, pretreatment visual analog scale (VAS), dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, urinary urgency, tenesmus, low back pain, vulvar varicosities, vaginal varicosities, and lower limb varices. The pain was relieved by embolizing the target lesions with different embolic materials. The efficacy and safety of the different embolization materials were compared by VAS and TVDUS examinations at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

Results

From a total of 495 patients, 88 patients were selected from the CPG group and 77 patients from the CPS group by propensity score matching. The patients were followed up for 36 months. The preoperative VAS score of the CPG group was 8 (range, 6-8), and the CPS score was 8 (range, 7-8; P = .64). The postembolization VAS score of the CPG group was 2.05 ± 0.37, and the CPS score was 2.14 ± 0.35 (P = .55). A total of 28 cases (16.9%) showed complications, most of which were transient pain after embolization. No serious complications such as coil embolization to the lungs occurred. In addition, the CPG group used fewer coils than the CPS group by using the slope embankment technique. The mean coil length of the CPG group was 77.18 ± 33.82 cm, and the CPS group was 105.29 ± 71 cm (P = .001). The CPG group had an average operative time of 44.49 ± 5.72 minutes, whereas the CPS group took 43.45 ± 4.18 minutes on average (P = .19). The radiation dose in the CPG group was 398.40 ± 76.16 mGy, and the radiation dose in the CPS group was 388 ± 44.23 mGy (P = .30). The median recurrence-free survival in the CPG group was 34.23 months (95% confidence interval, 33.2-35.2), and the median recurrence-free survival in the CPS group was 30.39 months (95% confidence interval, 28.2-32.6; log rank P = .018).

Conclusions

Embolization therapy for refluxing PeVD was safe and effective, and proficient use of slope embankment technique with CPG increased efficacy and reduced complications.