Objectives: Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cyanoacrylate ablation (CA) are widely used for the treatment of chronic great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency. Compared with traditional surgery, both modalities have demonstrated well-recognized therapeutic benefits. However, controversy remains regarding the optimal choice between RFA and CA. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the early and mid-term clinical outcomes of RFA versus CA.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating RFA and CA for the treatment of GSV incompetence were included. The primary outcomes were GSV occlusion rate and venous clinical severity score (VCSS). Secondary outcomes included skin pigmentation, phlebitis, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), ecchymosis, and procedure-related phlebitis. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3.
Results: A total of 21 studies were included, encompassing 7,844 patients and 9,677 limbs. In terms of efficacy, there were no significant differences between CA and RFA in GSV occlusion rate or VCSS. Regarding safety, pooled data showed that CA was associated with a lower incidence of ecchymosis (5.96% vs. 10.97%; P = 0.01) and paresthesia (1.24% vs. 2.97%; P = 0.04). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of phlebitis, DVT, or pigmentation. In addition, the procedure time was significantly shorter in the CA group than in the RFA group (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: For the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins, CA provides comparable efficacy to RFA. However, CA is associated with lower rates of skin pigmentation and ecchymosis, as well as a shorter procedure time.
Objectives: To compare preoperative right ventricle-to-left ventricle (RV/LV) ratios by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and echocardiography and evaluate treatment outcomes of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).
Methods: We retrospectively identified patients treated for intermediate-risk PE from 2018-2023 defined by systolic blood pressure (BP) >90 mmHg and right ventricle dysfunction defined by RV/LV ratio >0.9 via echocardiogram. RV/LV ratios were also evaluated on diagnostic CTA for comparison to echocardiogram values. Patients underwent USAT or MT based on thrombus location and contraindications to thrombolysis. Primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS (HLOS), and 30-day and 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included RV/LV change post-treatment on echocardiography, concomitant deep vein thrombosis (DVT), elevated cardiac biomarkers, blood transfusion, history of DVT/PE or malignancy, and imaging modality comparison in determination of RV/LV and RV/LV changes.
Results: Of 120 patients from a single center treated for intermediate-risk PE, 100 underwent USAT and 20 MT. There was no difference in ICU LOS (2.4 vs 2.6, p=0.67) or HLOS (4.8 vs 5.7, p=0.41) for USAT and MT, respectively. There was no difference in 30-day (98% vs 100%), or 1-year survival (96% vs 90%). MT patients had greater incidence of blood transfusion (25% vs 5%, p=0.011). CTA overestimated RV/LV ratios preoperatively compared with echocardiography (1.4, SD=0.4 vs 1.3, SD 0.2, p=0.027). Patients undergoing MT were more likely to have identified lower extremity (LE) DVT compared to USAT (90% vs 65%, p=0.033). Other secondary outcomes showed no significant differences between treatment groups.
Conclusions: Both USAT and MT provide excellent short-term and intermediate outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk PE, similar survival rates, similar post-treatment change in right heart dysfunction, and comparable ICU and hospital stays. MT is associated with higher transfusion rates, so caution should be exercised in patients felt to be at risk from further blood loss. These findings support individualized, anatomy- and risk-based selection of catheter-based therapy within a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response framework.

