Health Star Rating of Nonalcoholic, Packaged, and Ready-to-Drink Beverages in Türkiye: A Decision Tree Model Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Preventive Nutrition and Food Science Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI:10.3746/pnf.2024.29.2.199
Aylin Bayındır Gümüş, Murat Açık, Sevinç Eşer Durmaz
{"title":"Health Star Rating of Nonalcoholic, Packaged, and Ready-to-Drink Beverages in Türkiye: A Decision Tree Model Study.","authors":"Aylin Bayındır Gümüş, Murat Açık, Sevinç Eşer Durmaz","doi":"10.3746/pnf.2024.29.2.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the nutritional quality of beverages sold in Türkiye according to their labeling profiles. A total of 304 nonalcoholic beverages sold in supermarkets and online markets with the highest market capacity in Türkiye were included. Milk and dairy products, sports drinks, and beverages for children were excluded. The health star rating (HSR) was used to assess the nutritional quality of beverages. The nutritional quality of beverages was evaluated using a decision tree model according to the HSR score based on the variables presented on the beverage label. Moreover, confusion matrix tests were used to test the model's accuracy. The mean HSR score of beverages was 2.6±1.9, of which 30.2% were in the healthy category (HSR≥3.5). Fermented and 100% fruit juice beverages had the highest mean HSR scores. According to the decision tree model of the training set, the predictors of HSR quality score, in order of importance, were as follows: added sugar (46%), sweetener (28%), additives (19%), fructose-glucose syrup (4%), and caffeine (3%). In the test set, the accuracy rate and F1 score were 0.90 and 0.82, respectively, suggesting that the prediction performance of our model had the perfect fit. According to the HSR classification, most beverages were found to be unhealthy. Thus, they increase the risk of the development of obesity and other diseases because of their easy consumption. The decision tree learning algorithm could guide the population to choose healthy beverages based on their labeling information.</p>","PeriodicalId":20424,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Nutrition and Food Science","volume":"29 2","pages":"199-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Nutrition and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2024.29.2.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the nutritional quality of beverages sold in Türkiye according to their labeling profiles. A total of 304 nonalcoholic beverages sold in supermarkets and online markets with the highest market capacity in Türkiye were included. Milk and dairy products, sports drinks, and beverages for children were excluded. The health star rating (HSR) was used to assess the nutritional quality of beverages. The nutritional quality of beverages was evaluated using a decision tree model according to the HSR score based on the variables presented on the beverage label. Moreover, confusion matrix tests were used to test the model's accuracy. The mean HSR score of beverages was 2.6±1.9, of which 30.2% were in the healthy category (HSR≥3.5). Fermented and 100% fruit juice beverages had the highest mean HSR scores. According to the decision tree model of the training set, the predictors of HSR quality score, in order of importance, were as follows: added sugar (46%), sweetener (28%), additives (19%), fructose-glucose syrup (4%), and caffeine (3%). In the test set, the accuracy rate and F1 score were 0.90 and 0.82, respectively, suggesting that the prediction performance of our model had the perfect fit. According to the HSR classification, most beverages were found to be unhealthy. Thus, they increase the risk of the development of obesity and other diseases because of their easy consumption. The decision tree learning algorithm could guide the population to choose healthy beverages based on their labeling information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其非酒精饮料、包装饮料和即饮饮料的健康星级评定:决策树模型研究》。
本研究旨在根据标签内容比较在土耳其销售的饮料的营养质量。研究对象包括在土耳其市场容量最大的超市和网上市场销售的 304 种非酒精饮料。牛奶和乳制品、运动饮料和儿童饮料不包括在内。健康星级(HSR)用于评估饮料的营养质量。根据饮料标签上的变量,采用决策树模型根据 HSR 分数评估饮料的营养质量。此外,还使用了混淆矩阵测试来检验模型的准确性。饮料的平均 HSR 得分为 2.6±1.9,其中 30.2% 属于健康类别(HSR≥3.5)。发酵饮料和 100% 果汁饮料的平均 HSR 分数最高。根据训练集的决策树模型,HSR 质量得分的预测因子按重要性排序如下:添加糖(46%)、甜味剂(28%)、添加剂(19%)、果糖-葡萄糖浆(4%)和咖啡因(3%)。在测试集中,准确率和 F1 分数分别为 0.90 和 0.82,这表明我们的模型具有完美的预测性能。根据 HSR 分类,大多数饮料都是不健康的。因此,由于饮用方便,它们会增加肥胖和其他疾病的发病风险。决策树学习算法可以根据饮料的标签信息引导人们选择健康的饮料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Nutrition and Food Science
Preventive Nutrition and Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Antioxidant and Longevity-Related Properties of the Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Cnidium officinale Makino in Caenorhabditis elegans. Effect of Siegesbeckia glabrescens Extract on Foam Cell Formation in THP-1 Macrophages. Effects of Green Tea and Java Pepper Mixture on Gut Microbiome and Colonic MicroRNA-221/222 in Mice with Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis. Erratum to: "Standardized Combined Plant Extract, RUG-com, Reduces Bacterial Levels and Suppresses Acute and Chronic Inflammation in Balb/c Mice Infected with CagA+ Helicobacter pylori." Ethanolic Extract from Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench Inhibits Influenza A/B and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in vitro: Preventive Agent for Viral Respiratory Infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1