Computed tomography diagnosis of pulmonary infarction in acute pulmonary embolism

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis research Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109071
Fleur H.J. Kaptein , J. Lauran Stöger , Lisette F. van Dam , Maarten K. Ninaber , Bart J.A. Mertens , Menno V. Huisman , Frederikus A. Klok , Lucia J.M. Kroft
{"title":"Computed tomography diagnosis of pulmonary infarction in acute pulmonary embolism","authors":"Fleur H.J. Kaptein ,&nbsp;J. Lauran Stöger ,&nbsp;Lisette F. van Dam ,&nbsp;Maarten K. Ninaber ,&nbsp;Bart J.A. Mertens ,&nbsp;Menno V. Huisman ,&nbsp;Frederikus A. Klok ,&nbsp;Lucia J.M. Kroft","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pulmonary infarction is a common sequela of pulmonary embolism (PE) but lacks a diagnostic reference standard. CTPA in the setting of acute PE does not reliably differentiate infarction from other consolidations, such as reversible alveolar hemorrhage or atelectasis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy for recognizing pulmonary infarction on CT in the acute phase of PE, with follow-up CT as reference.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Initial and follow-up CT scans of 33 patients with acute PE were retrospectively assessed. Two radiologists independently evaluated the presence and size of suspected pulmonary infarction on the initial CT. Confirmation of infarction was established by detection of residual densities on follow-up CT. Sensitivity, specificity and interobserver variability were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 60 presumed infarctions were found in 32 patients, of which 34 infarctions in 21 patients could be confirmed at follow-up. On patient-level, observers' sensitivity/specificity were 91 %/9 %, and 73 %/46 %, respectively, with interobserver agreement by Kappa's coefficient of 0.17. Confirmed infarctions were usually larger than false positive lesions (median approximate volume of 6.6 mL [IQR 0.84–21.3] vs. 1.3 mL [IQR 0.57–6.5], <em>p</em> = 0.040), but still small. An occluding thrombus in a supplying vessel was predictive for confirmed infarction (OR 11, 95%CI 2.1–55), but was not discriminative.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pulmonary infarction is a common finding in acute PE, and generally small. Radiological identification of infarction was challenging, with considerable interobserver variability. Complete obstruction of the supplying (sub)segmental pulmonary artery was found as the strongest predictor for pulmonary infarction but was not demonstrated to be discriminative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002032/pdfft?md5=cae3b60547edba9a264f38e5e9da4281&pid=1-s2.0-S0049384824002032-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pulmonary infarction is a common sequela of pulmonary embolism (PE) but lacks a diagnostic reference standard. CTPA in the setting of acute PE does not reliably differentiate infarction from other consolidations, such as reversible alveolar hemorrhage or atelectasis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy for recognizing pulmonary infarction on CT in the acute phase of PE, with follow-up CT as reference.

Materials and methods

Initial and follow-up CT scans of 33 patients with acute PE were retrospectively assessed. Two radiologists independently evaluated the presence and size of suspected pulmonary infarction on the initial CT. Confirmation of infarction was established by detection of residual densities on follow-up CT. Sensitivity, specificity and interobserver variability were calculated.

Results

In total, 60 presumed infarctions were found in 32 patients, of which 34 infarctions in 21 patients could be confirmed at follow-up. On patient-level, observers' sensitivity/specificity were 91 %/9 %, and 73 %/46 %, respectively, with interobserver agreement by Kappa's coefficient of 0.17. Confirmed infarctions were usually larger than false positive lesions (median approximate volume of 6.6 mL [IQR 0.84–21.3] vs. 1.3 mL [IQR 0.57–6.5], p = 0.040), but still small. An occluding thrombus in a supplying vessel was predictive for confirmed infarction (OR 11, 95%CI 2.1–55), but was not discriminative.

Conclusions

Pulmonary infarction is a common finding in acute PE, and generally small. Radiological identification of infarction was challenging, with considerable interobserver variability. Complete obstruction of the supplying (sub)segmental pulmonary artery was found as the strongest predictor for pulmonary infarction but was not demonstrated to be discriminative.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性肺栓塞的肺梗塞计算机断层扫描诊断。
导言:肺梗塞是肺栓塞(PE)的常见后遗症,但缺乏诊断参考标准。急性 PE 时的 CTPA 不能可靠地区分肺栓塞和其他合并症,如可逆性肺泡出血或肺不张。我们的目的是以随访 CT 为参考,评估 PE 急性期 CT 识别肺梗死的诊断准确性:我们对 33 名急性 PE 患者的初次和随访 CT 扫描进行了回顾性评估。两名放射科医生独立评估初次 CT 上疑似肺梗死的存在和大小。通过在随访 CT 上检测残留密度来确认梗塞。计算敏感性、特异性和观察者之间的差异性:结果:总共在 32 名患者中发现了 60 个推测的梗死点,其中 21 名患者中的 34 个梗死点可在随访中得到确认。在患者层面,观察者的敏感性/特异性分别为 91%/9% 和 73%/46%,观察者之间的卡帕系数为 0.17。确诊的梗塞通常比假阳性病变大(中位近似体积为 6.6 mL [IQR 0.84-21.3] 对 1.3 mL [IQR 0.57-6.5], p = 0.040),但仍然很小。供血血管中的闭塞血栓可预测确诊梗死(OR 11,95%CI 2.1-55),但不具有鉴别性:结论:肺梗塞是急性 PE 中的常见病,而且一般较小。结论:肺梗塞是急性 PE 中的常见病,而且通常较小。梗塞的放射学鉴别具有挑战性,观察者之间的差异相当大。供血(亚)段肺动脉完全阻塞是肺梗塞的最强预测因素,但未被证明具有鉴别作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
期刊最新文献
The role of anticoagulation on the long-term survival of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies. Hemophilia A: Economic burden, therapeutic advances, and future forecasts in the Middle East and North Africa region. Limitations of a platelet count-based clinical decision support system to facilitate diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Prothrombin complex concentrate for direct factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding or before urgent surgery. COVID-19 venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1