Impact of an automated patient outcome feedback system on emergency medicine resident patient follow-up: An interrupted time series analysis

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1002/aet2.11011
Frances Rudolf MD, Leslie C. Oyama MD, Robert El-Kareh MD, MPH
{"title":"Impact of an automated patient outcome feedback system on emergency medicine resident patient follow-up: An interrupted time series analysis","authors":"Frances Rudolf MD,&nbsp;Leslie C. Oyama MD,&nbsp;Robert El-Kareh MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency medicine (EM) residents desire, but often lack, reliable feedback of patient outcomes following handoffs to other providers. This gap is a substantial barrier to calibrating their diagnostic decision making and learning. To address this educational priority, we developed and evaluated the Post-Handoff Reports of Outcomes (PHAROS) system—an automated system within our electronic health record (EHR) to deliver provider-specific patient outcome feedback.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PHAROS includes: (1) individualized lists of patients seen and brief summaries of each case, (2) flags for important posthandoff events, and (3) links to charts to facilitate review. Starting June 2020, we coupled PHAROS with a resident educational session and individualized emails every 2 weeks outlining patients seen, number of posthandoff events, and instructions on how to access the PHAROS system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From July 2017 through April 2022, we measured the proportion of handoffs followed by reaccessing patients’ charts between 2 and 14 days posthandoff—a proxy for following up on the patient's outcomes. We performed an interrupted time series analysis on this outcome to determine if PHAROS was associated with a significant change in the trend of our outcome over time. Our secondary outcome was the number of times PHAROS was viewed each month. Our primary outcome had a significant increase in the slope over time (+0.13%/month, <i>p</i> = 0.03) after the introduction of the personalized reports and a nonsignificant change (−1.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.07) at the time of the intervention. The median (IQR) number of views of PHAROS per month was 33.2 (23.75–38.75).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The PHAROS system was associated with a significant increase in the rate of posthandoff chart reaccess among EM residents over time. The PHAROS project demonstrated the feasibility of harnessing the capabilities of the EHR to create an automated system to support EM trainee feedback of patient outcomes—a key component of diagnostic calibration and learning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Emergency medicine (EM) residents desire, but often lack, reliable feedback of patient outcomes following handoffs to other providers. This gap is a substantial barrier to calibrating their diagnostic decision making and learning. To address this educational priority, we developed and evaluated the Post-Handoff Reports of Outcomes (PHAROS) system—an automated system within our electronic health record (EHR) to deliver provider-specific patient outcome feedback.

Methods

PHAROS includes: (1) individualized lists of patients seen and brief summaries of each case, (2) flags for important posthandoff events, and (3) links to charts to facilitate review. Starting June 2020, we coupled PHAROS with a resident educational session and individualized emails every 2 weeks outlining patients seen, number of posthandoff events, and instructions on how to access the PHAROS system.

Results

From July 2017 through April 2022, we measured the proportion of handoffs followed by reaccessing patients’ charts between 2 and 14 days posthandoff—a proxy for following up on the patient's outcomes. We performed an interrupted time series analysis on this outcome to determine if PHAROS was associated with a significant change in the trend of our outcome over time. Our secondary outcome was the number of times PHAROS was viewed each month. Our primary outcome had a significant increase in the slope over time (+0.13%/month, p = 0.03) after the introduction of the personalized reports and a nonsignificant change (−1.6%, p = 0.07) at the time of the intervention. The median (IQR) number of views of PHAROS per month was 33.2 (23.75–38.75).

Conclusions

The PHAROS system was associated with a significant increase in the rate of posthandoff chart reaccess among EM residents over time. The PHAROS project demonstrated the feasibility of harnessing the capabilities of the EHR to create an automated system to support EM trainee feedback of patient outcomes—a key component of diagnostic calibration and learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病人结果自动反馈系统对急诊科住院医生病人随访的影响:间断时间序列分析。
目的:急诊医学(EM)住院医师希望在与其他医疗服务提供者交接后获得可靠的患者结果反馈,但往往缺乏这种反馈。这一缺陷严重阻碍了他们的诊断决策和学习。为了解决这一教育重点问题,我们开发并评估了交接后结果报告(PHAROS)系统--这是我们电子健康记录(EHR)中的一个自动化系统,用于提供特定于提供者的患者结果反馈:PHAROS 包括(方法:PHAROS 包括:(1)就诊患者的个性化列表和每个病例的简短摘要;(2)重要离职后事件的标记;以及(3)图表链接以方便查看。自 2020 年 6 月起,我们将 PHAROS 与住院医师教育课程和每两周一次的个性化电子邮件相结合,概述就诊患者、离职后事件数量以及如何访问 PHAROS 系统的说明:从 2017 年 7 月到 2022 年 4 月,我们测量了交接后 2 到 14 天内重新访问患者病历的交接比例,这代表了对患者治疗结果的跟进。我们对这一结果进行了间断时间序列分析,以确定 PHAROS 是否与我们的结果随时间推移的趋势发生显著变化有关。我们的次要结果是每月查看 PHAROS 的次数。在引入个性化报告后,我们的主要结果随时间推移的斜率有了明显增加(+0.13%/月,p = 0.03),而在干预期间则没有明显变化(-1.6%,p = 0.07)。PHAROS每月浏览次数的中位数(IQR)为33.2(23.75-38.75):结论:随着时间的推移,PHAROS 系统显著提高了急诊科住院医师离职后重新访问病历的比率。PHAROS 项目证明了利用电子病历的功能创建自动化系统以支持急诊科学员对患者结果进行反馈的可行性--这是诊断校准和学习的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience. Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients Use of in situ simulation to improve team performance and utilization of a rapid sequence intubation checklist Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1