eHealth early intervention programs to support premature parents transitioning from NICU to home on parental and infant outcomes: a systematic review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00422
Liliana Ferraz, Maria Raul Xavier, Manuel Gameiro, Ana Filipa Cardoso, Daniela Cardoso, Lúcia Paradela, Daniela Dinis, Estela Coutinho, Ananda Fernandes
{"title":"eHealth early intervention programs to support premature parents transitioning from NICU to home on parental and infant outcomes: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Liliana Ferraz, Maria Raul Xavier, Manuel Gameiro, Ana Filipa Cardoso, Daniela Cardoso, Lúcia Paradela, Daniela Dinis, Estela Coutinho, Ananda Fernandes","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will assess the effectiveness of eHealth early intervention programs in supporting premature infants and their parents transition from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to home and the impact of such programs on parental and infant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The literature has shown the benefits of eHealth early intervention programs to support premature infants and their parents after discharge from NICUs. Parents have reported benefits such as enhanced user-friendliness, increased confidence in infant care, satisfaction, and knowledge acquisition. However, the effectiveness of these programs on parental and infant outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies that assess any early intervention program using eHealth to support premature infants and their parents after discharge from NICU. The programs may be initiated during hospitalization or within the first month of discharge. The programs will include interventions that use eHealth components (eg, teleconsultation), either alone or in combination with face-to-face interventions (eg, home visits). This review will consider parental outcomes, including stress, anxiety, competence, and satisfaction, as well as infant outcomes, including health service utilization and cognitive, motor, and social development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The search strategy will aim to find both published and unpublished quantitative studies in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, without any geographical or cultural limitations. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction. The results will be accompanied by a narrative synthesis. If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted and the Summary of Findings will be presented using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023444721.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review will assess the effectiveness of eHealth early intervention programs in supporting premature infants and their parents transition from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to home and the impact of such programs on parental and infant outcomes.

Introduction: The literature has shown the benefits of eHealth early intervention programs to support premature infants and their parents after discharge from NICUs. Parents have reported benefits such as enhanced user-friendliness, increased confidence in infant care, satisfaction, and knowledge acquisition. However, the effectiveness of these programs on parental and infant outcomes remains unclear.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies that assess any early intervention program using eHealth to support premature infants and their parents after discharge from NICU. The programs may be initiated during hospitalization or within the first month of discharge. The programs will include interventions that use eHealth components (eg, teleconsultation), either alone or in combination with face-to-face interventions (eg, home visits). This review will consider parental outcomes, including stress, anxiety, competence, and satisfaction, as well as infant outcomes, including health service utilization and cognitive, motor, and social development.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The search strategy will aim to find both published and unpublished quantitative studies in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, without any geographical or cultural limitations. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction. The results will be accompanied by a narrative synthesis. If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted and the Summary of Findings will be presented using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023444721.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持早产父母从新生儿重症监护室过渡到家庭的电子健康早期干预计划对父母和婴儿结果的影响:系统综述方案。
目的:本综述旨在评估电子健康早期干预项目在支持早产儿及其父母从新生儿重症监护室(NICU)过渡到家庭生活方面的有效性,以及此类项目对父母和婴儿结果的影响:文献显示,电子健康早期干预项目可为从新生儿重症监护室出院后的早产儿及其父母提供支持。据家长们反映,他们受益匪浅,如提高了用户友好度、增强了对婴儿护理的信心、提高了满意度并获得了知识。然而,这些项目对父母和婴儿结果的影响仍不明确:本综述将考虑对任何使用电子保健来支持从新生儿重症监护室出院后的早产儿及其父母的早期干预项目进行评估的研究。这些项目可在住院期间或出院后的第一个月内启动。这些项目将包括单独使用或与面对面干预(如家访)相结合使用电子健康组件(如远程咨询)的干预措施。本综述将考虑父母的结果,包括压力、焦虑、能力和满意度,以及婴儿的结果,包括医疗服务利用率以及认知、运动和社交能力的发展:方法:本综述将遵循 JBI 的有效性系统综述方法。搜索策略旨在找到已发表和未发表的英语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语定量研究,不受任何地域或文化限制。两名审稿人将独立完成研究选择、批判性评估和数据提取。研究结果将附有叙述性综述。如有可能,将进行荟萃分析,并采用 GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)方法提交研究结果摘要:系统综述注册编号:PROCROPERO:CRD42023444721。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1