Evaluation of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) weight on firefighter stamina, comfort, and postural stability.

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-07 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2024.2375026
Richard M Kesler, Jeffrey Powell, Dac Nguyen, Kristen A Massey, Sarthak Joshi, Susan Xu, Ziqing Zhuang, Gavin P Horn, Nicholas A Burd, Farzaneh Masoud
{"title":"Evaluation of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) weight on firefighter stamina, comfort, and postural stability.","authors":"Richard M Kesler, Jeffrey Powell, Dac Nguyen, Kristen A Massey, Sarthak Joshi, Susan Xu, Ziqing Zhuang, Gavin P Horn, Nicholas A Burd, Farzaneh Masoud","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2375026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Firefighters wear personal protective equipment to protect them from the thermal and chemical environment in which they operate. The self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) provides isolation of the airway from the hazardous fireground. National standards limit SCBA weight, however, integration of additional features could result in an SCBA exceeding the current limit. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of increased SCBA weight on firefighters' physiological responses, work output, dynamic stability, and comfort. Completion of simulated firefighting activities induced a strong physiological response. Peak oxygen consumption was higher with the lightest SCBA than the heaviest SCBA. Few other physiological differences were noted as SCBA weight increased. Importantly, increased SCBA weight resulted in significantly more negative perceptions by the firefighters and a trend towards significance for the duration of work time prior to reaching volitional fatigue. These results should be considered when assessing changes to existing SCBA weight limits.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"557-570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2375026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firefighters wear personal protective equipment to protect them from the thermal and chemical environment in which they operate. The self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) provides isolation of the airway from the hazardous fireground. National standards limit SCBA weight, however, integration of additional features could result in an SCBA exceeding the current limit. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of increased SCBA weight on firefighters' physiological responses, work output, dynamic stability, and comfort. Completion of simulated firefighting activities induced a strong physiological response. Peak oxygen consumption was higher with the lightest SCBA than the heaviest SCBA. Few other physiological differences were noted as SCBA weight increased. Importantly, increased SCBA weight resulted in significantly more negative perceptions by the firefighters and a trend towards significance for the duration of work time prior to reaching volitional fatigue. These results should be considered when assessing changes to existing SCBA weight limits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估自给式呼吸器(SCBA)重量对消防员耐力、舒适度和姿势稳定性的影响。
消防员穿戴个人防护装备,以保护他们免受工作环境中的热和化学环境的影响。自给式呼吸器(SCBA)可将呼吸道与危险的火场隔离。国家标准限制了 SCBA 的重量,但是,附加功能的集成可能会导致 SCBA 超过当前的限制。本研究旨在考察增加 SCBA 重量对消防员生理反应、工作输出、动态稳定性和舒适度的影响。完成模拟消防活动会引起强烈的生理反应。使用最轻的 SCBA 时,峰值耗氧量高于使用最重的 SCBA 时。随着 SCBA 重量的增加,几乎没有发现其他生理差异。重要的是,SCBA 重量增加会导致消防员的负面感知明显增加,而且在达到自愿疲劳之前的工作时间长度也有显著增加的趋势。在评估现有 SCBA 重量限制的变化时,应考虑这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
期刊最新文献
A model-driven approach for prospective ergonomics: application to ikigai robotics. An integrated prototyping tool to enhance interdisciplinary communication in smart product design. Prospective ergonomics for the design of future things. How to catch prospective use? A comparative study of virtual environment movie and guided imaginary for projecting future users in a public space. Risk assessment of musculoskeletal disorder symptoms for touch screen mobile devices users by failure mode and effect analysis method: a data envelopment analysis approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1