Gender diversity and healthcare performance: A quantitative analysis from the Italian health system

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105117
D. Trinchese, M. Vainieri, P. Cantarelli
{"title":"Gender diversity and healthcare performance: A quantitative analysis from the Italian health system","authors":"D. Trinchese,&nbsp;M. Vainieri,&nbsp;P. Cantarelli","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unlike many other industries, which are characterized by a more significant presence of men than women, the healthcare sector has a clear majority of women. However, even if at the non-executive level, the percentage of women is extremely higher than that of men, at the executive level, this percentage is completely overturned, generating the so-called glass ceiling effect. Despite extensive research on gender diversity and its impact on financial metrics, few studies have focused on clinical measures. To bridge this research gap, the article analyzes the relationship between gender diversity and healthcare metrics. We developed an econometric model for unbalanced panel data by performing a random effect and a quantile regression analysis, which test the relationship between gender diversity and the average length of stay (LOS), controlling for structural and clinical metrics. We find that, in general, a higher percentage of women in non-executive positions is related to an increase in LOS. Conversely, a higher rate of women in executive positions is related to a lower level of LOS. Empirical evidence supports the relevance of including human resources strategies to increase the number of women at executive managerial positions. However, the study highlights also the necessity to consider how to make the public health sector positions more appealing for men.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 105117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001271/pdfft?md5=74c353743788d38f5da79defa1a04ad2&pid=1-s2.0-S0168851024001271-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlike many other industries, which are characterized by a more significant presence of men than women, the healthcare sector has a clear majority of women. However, even if at the non-executive level, the percentage of women is extremely higher than that of men, at the executive level, this percentage is completely overturned, generating the so-called glass ceiling effect. Despite extensive research on gender diversity and its impact on financial metrics, few studies have focused on clinical measures. To bridge this research gap, the article analyzes the relationship between gender diversity and healthcare metrics. We developed an econometric model for unbalanced panel data by performing a random effect and a quantile regression analysis, which test the relationship between gender diversity and the average length of stay (LOS), controlling for structural and clinical metrics. We find that, in general, a higher percentage of women in non-executive positions is related to an increase in LOS. Conversely, a higher rate of women in executive positions is related to a lower level of LOS. Empirical evidence supports the relevance of including human resources strategies to increase the number of women at executive managerial positions. However, the study highlights also the necessity to consider how to make the public health sector positions more appealing for men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别多样性与医疗保健绩效:意大利医疗系统的定量分析。
许多其他行业的特点是男性多于女性,与此不同,医疗保健行业的女性明显占多数。然而,即使在非执行层面,女性的比例远远高于男性,但在执行层面,这一比例被完全推翻,产生了所谓的 "玻璃天花板效应"。尽管对性别多样性及其对财务指标的影响进行了广泛研究,但很少有研究关注临床指标。为了弥补这一研究空白,本文分析了性别多样性与医疗指标之间的关系。我们建立了一个非平衡面板数据计量经济模型,通过随机效应和量子回归分析,检验了性别多样性与平均住院时间(LOS)之间的关系,并对结构性指标和临床指标进行了控制。我们发现,一般来说,女性在非行政职位中所占比例越高,住院时间就越长。相反,女性担任行政职务的比例越高,LOS 水平越低。经验证据证明,纳入人力资源战略以增加担任行政管理职位的妇女人数是有意义的。不过,这项研究也强调,有必要考虑如何使公共卫生部门的职位对男性更具吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Development of an organizational typology of interprofessional primary care teams in Quebec, Canada: A multivariate analysis A good start for all children: Integrating early-life course medical and social care through Solid Start, the Netherlands’ nationwide action programme Caregiver preferences and willingness-to-pay for home care services for older people with dementia: A discrete choice experiment in the Milan metropolitan area How beliefs and policy characteristics shape the public acceptability of nutritional policies—A survey study in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1