Development of an organizational typology of interprofessional primary care teams in Quebec, Canada: A multivariate analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105202
Maria Alejandra Rodriguez-Duarte, Pamela Fernainy, Lise Gauvin, Géraldine Layani, Marie-Eve Poitras, Mylaine Breton, Claire Godard-Sebillotte, Catherine Hudon, Janusz Kaczorowski, Yves Couturier, Anaïs Lacasse, Marie-Thérèse Lussier, Cristina Longo, Nadia Sourial
{"title":"Development of an organizational typology of interprofessional primary care teams in Quebec, Canada: A multivariate analysis.","authors":"Maria Alejandra Rodriguez-Duarte, Pamela Fernainy, Lise Gauvin, Géraldine Layani, Marie-Eve Poitras, Mylaine Breton, Claire Godard-Sebillotte, Catherine Hudon, Janusz Kaczorowski, Yves Couturier, Anaïs Lacasse, Marie-Thérèse Lussier, Cristina Longo, Nadia Sourial","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop an organizational typology of Interprofessional Primary Care (IPC) teams in Quebec, Canada, by describing their organizational profiles and assessing the association between the characteristics of the populations served and the organizational profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out using a finite mixture model of the 2021 financial monitoring data from the Ministry of Health and Social Services of Quebec. The population consisted of all IPC teams in Quebec (N = 368). A multinomial logistic model was used to assess the association between the population characteristics and the organizational profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that IPC teams were heterogeneous and could be classified into five distinct profiles varying in size, team composition, sector, type, and level of partnership. Pregnant women (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.98-3.91), disadvantaged patients ([OR] = 1.62, [CI] 1.15-2.28), patients receiving homecare support ([OR] = 1.85, [CI] 1.28-2.66) and rural patients ([OR] = 0.66, [CI] 0.50-0.86)) were more likely to be associated to the medium, public, university-affiliated, practitioner-oriented, low partnered profile compared to the very small, private, regular, high-partnered profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPC teams can be characterized into five distinct profiles that are associated with the characteristics of the populations they serve. These results may help to better evaluate if the desired effects of IPC teams have been achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"152 ","pages":"105202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop an organizational typology of Interprofessional Primary Care (IPC) teams in Quebec, Canada, by describing their organizational profiles and assessing the association between the characteristics of the populations served and the organizational profiles.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out using a finite mixture model of the 2021 financial monitoring data from the Ministry of Health and Social Services of Quebec. The population consisted of all IPC teams in Quebec (N = 368). A multinomial logistic model was used to assess the association between the population characteristics and the organizational profiles.

Results: The analysis revealed that IPC teams were heterogeneous and could be classified into five distinct profiles varying in size, team composition, sector, type, and level of partnership. Pregnant women (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.98-3.91), disadvantaged patients ([OR] = 1.62, [CI] 1.15-2.28), patients receiving homecare support ([OR] = 1.85, [CI] 1.28-2.66) and rural patients ([OR] = 0.66, [CI] 0.50-0.86)) were more likely to be associated to the medium, public, university-affiliated, practitioner-oriented, low partnered profile compared to the very small, private, regular, high-partnered profile.

Conclusion: IPC teams can be characterized into five distinct profiles that are associated with the characteristics of the populations they serve. These results may help to better evaluate if the desired effects of IPC teams have been achieved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
期刊最新文献
How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa. Implementing integrated care infrastructure: A longitudinal study on the interplay of policies, interorganizational arrangements and interoperability in NHS England. Public contributions to R&D of medical innovations: A framework for analysis. What mechanisms lead to the endurance of health and social care integration? A multiple case study in Italy. The right to health for socioeconomically disadvantaged TB patients in South Korea: An AAAQ framework analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1