Medicare expenditures among spouses of persons with dementia

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19074
Bailey C. Ingraham PhD, Douglas Barthold PhD, Norma B. Coe PhD, Paul Fishman PhD
{"title":"Medicare expenditures among spouses of persons with dementia","authors":"Bailey C. Ingraham PhD,&nbsp;Douglas Barthold PhD,&nbsp;Norma B. Coe PhD,&nbsp;Paul Fishman PhD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Spouses of persons living with dementia face intense strains on their well-being compared with similarly aged adults and spouses of partners with no dementia. This strain can impact spouses' health and healthcare needs, and therefore affect their healthcare utilization and expenditures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from the Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare claims, we matched dyads of spouses and their partners with dementia (SPWD) to a comparison group of similar spouses and their partners with no dementia (SPWND). We then examined Medicare expenditures for spouses in the 5 years following their partner's dementia onset month using a two-part regression model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>SPWD cumulative total Medicare expenditures were, on average, $60,043 in the 5 years post dementia onset, compared to $56,068 for SPWND. This difference ($3974, 95% CI = [−$3,199; $11,477]) was not significant. However, there were significant differences in the 5th year's total expenditures (+$2,748 [$321; $5,447]), driven by inpatient expenditures ($1,562 [$22; $3,277]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the differences in partner's dementia status, we found no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative Medicare expenditures between SPWD and SPWND. Compared to previous studies, we likely captured an earlier stage of dementia more consistently for a broader population which may be less straining on spouses. Further research should examine patterns of expenditures in later years and around critical timepoints in caregiving, such as partner transitions to formal long-term care settings and death, to better understand healthcare expenditures for spouses of persons living with dementia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 10","pages":"3200-3209"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Spouses of persons living with dementia face intense strains on their well-being compared with similarly aged adults and spouses of partners with no dementia. This strain can impact spouses' health and healthcare needs, and therefore affect their healthcare utilization and expenditures.

Methods

Using data from the Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare claims, we matched dyads of spouses and their partners with dementia (SPWD) to a comparison group of similar spouses and their partners with no dementia (SPWND). We then examined Medicare expenditures for spouses in the 5 years following their partner's dementia onset month using a two-part regression model.

Results

SPWD cumulative total Medicare expenditures were, on average, $60,043 in the 5 years post dementia onset, compared to $56,068 for SPWND. This difference ($3974, 95% CI = [−$3,199; $11,477]) was not significant. However, there were significant differences in the 5th year's total expenditures (+$2,748 [$321; $5,447]), driven by inpatient expenditures ($1,562 [$22; $3,277]).

Conclusions

Despite the differences in partner's dementia status, we found no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative Medicare expenditures between SPWD and SPWND. Compared to previous studies, we likely captured an earlier stage of dementia more consistently for a broader population which may be less straining on spouses. Further research should examine patterns of expenditures in later years and around critical timepoints in caregiving, such as partner transitions to formal long-term care settings and death, to better understand healthcare expenditures for spouses of persons living with dementia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者配偶的医疗保险支出。
背景:与年龄相仿的成年人和没有痴呆症的伴侣的配偶相比,痴呆症患者的配偶面临着巨大的压力。这种压力会影响配偶的健康和医疗保健需求,从而影响他们的医疗保健使用和支出:我们利用健康与退休研究(Health and Retirement Study)中与医疗保险(Medicare)报销单相关联的数据,将患有痴呆症的配偶及其伴侣(SPWD)与无痴呆症的类似配偶及其伴侣(SPWND)的对比组进行配对。然后,我们使用一个由两部分组成的回归模型,对配偶在其伴侣痴呆症发病月份之后 5 年内的医疗保险支出进行了研究:结果:在痴呆症发病后的 5 年中,SPWD 的累积医疗保险总支出平均为 60,043 美元,而 SPWND 为 56,068 美元。这一差异(3974 美元,95% CI = [-3199 美元;11477 美元])并不显著。然而,第 5 年的总支出(+2,748 美元 [321 美元;5,447 美元])却有显著差异,这主要是由住院支出(1,562 美元 [22 美元;3,277 美元])造成的:尽管伴侣的痴呆状态不同,但我们发现 SPWD 和 SPWND 的 5 年累计医疗保险支出没有显著差异。与之前的研究相比,我们可能更一致地捕捉到了更广泛人群中痴呆症的早期阶段,这可能会减轻配偶的压力。为了更好地了解痴呆症患者配偶的医疗支出情况,进一步的研究应该考察晚年以及护理过程中关键时间点的支出模式,如伴侣转入正规长期护理机构和死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Notices Issue Information Cover Issue Information Author Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1