首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society最新文献

英文 中文
Cover 封面
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70276
Lan Luo, Anna L. Parks, Gahee Oh, Sarah D. Berry, Susan L. Mitchell, Dae Hyun Kim, Sachin J. Shah, Darae Ko

Cover caption: Patterns of oral anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation following transition to long-term care. In an analysis of 2014-2019 Medicare Fee-for-Service data and MDS assessments (N=16,464), 25% of prior OAC users discontinued OAC and 20% of prior non-users initiated OAC within 30 days following transition to LTC. See the related article by Luo et al., pages 265–268.

封面标题:口服抗凝剂用于房颤过渡到长期护理后的模式。在对2014-2019年医疗保险按服务收费数据和MDS评估(N=16,464)的分析中,25%的先前OAC用户在过渡到LTC后的30天内停止了OAC, 20%的先前非用户开始了OAC。参见Luo等人的相关文章,第265-268页。
{"title":"Cover","authors":"Lan Luo,&nbsp;Anna L. Parks,&nbsp;Gahee Oh,&nbsp;Sarah D. Berry,&nbsp;Susan L. Mitchell,&nbsp;Dae Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Sachin J. Shah,&nbsp;Darae Ko","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Cover caption</b>: Patterns of oral anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation following transition to long-term care. In an analysis of 2014-2019 Medicare Fee-for-Service data and MDS assessments (N=16,464), 25% of prior OAC users discontinued OAC and 20% of prior non-users initiated OAC within 30 days following transition to LTC. See the related article by Luo et al., pages 265–268.\u0000\u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure></p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70276","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145909233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cover 封面
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70234
Brooke Lubinski, Sarah D. Berry

Cover caption: Factors to balance when considering osteoporosis treatment in nonagenarians. See the related article by Lubinski and Berry, pages 3643–3645.

封面说明:在考虑骨质疏松症治疗时需要平衡的因素。参见鲁宾斯基和贝瑞的相关文章,第3643-3645页。
{"title":"Cover","authors":"Brooke Lubinski,&nbsp;Sarah D. Berry","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Cover caption</b>: Factors to balance when considering osteoporosis treatment in nonagenarians. See the related article by Lubinski and Berry, pages 3643–3645.\u0000\u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure></p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70234","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145909300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Keeping Our Eyes on the Prize: Embedding Age-Friendly Care as the Health System Standard for All Older Adults 关注成果:将关爱老年人作为所有老年人的卫生系统标准。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70255
Anna K. Mirk, Camille P. Vaughan
<p>Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) represent a movement promoted by the John A. Hartford Foundation, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and the American Hospital Association to improve the quality of care for older adults throughout United States health care systems, with an ultimate goal of systemic and policy changes around how we care for older adults [<span>1</span>]. The movement first focused on organizational-level change and public recognition that older adults were not consistently receiving high quality care based on decades of research defining clinical models that promote best practices to address conditions that contribute to loss of independence, institutionalization, and premature death as we age [<span>2</span>]. AFHS engagement leads health care systems to adopt specific, evidence-based practices that address the essential domains of age-friendly care, known as the 4M's (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, Mobility). Through thoughtfully designed learning networks (collaboratives and action communities) that leverage collective implementation experience, geriatrics expertise, and momentum to improve older adult care, the movement has seen significant scale up with large health care systems, like the Veterans Health Administration (VA), initiating their own action communities. With this significant spread, in addition to the over 300 articles on the AFHS, the movement has gained the attention of policy makers, and other stakeholders, with the FY2025 Age-Friendly Hospital measure adopted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [<span>3</span>].</p><p>The 4M's were developed as a “sticky” evidence base to ensure recommended changes in practice could be easily understood by stakeholders and were scientifically valid [<span>1</span>]. The initial process measures (documentation of how each “M” is assessed and managed) and outcome measures (30-day readmissions, emergency department visits, patient satisfaction and hospital length of stay) proposed by IHI, while pragmatic, have shown unclear links with quality of care [<span>4</span>]. Additionally, while the evidence base for care practices focused on the individual “M”s is substantial, there is limited evidence supporting the model of assessment and management of all 4Ms as a set. Burke et al. proposed more global measures of age-friendly care that reflect outcomes important to older adults, such as “days at home” and “patient-centeredness” [<span>4</span>]. VA has invested heavily in the AFHS movement, even without large scale evidence of improved outcomes from implementation of the 4M's as a set, nor evidence in all care settings. The article by Bayer et al. adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of the 4Ms as a set in the VA inpatient setting.</p><p>The inpatient VA implementation of age-friendly care in the article by Bayer et al. leveraged a purpose-built electronic medical record (EMR) documentation tool designed to capture age-friendl
老年友好型卫生系统(AFHS)是由John a . Hartford基金会、医疗保健改善研究所(IHI)和美国医院协会推动的一项运动,旨在提高整个美国医疗保健系统对老年人的护理质量,其最终目标是围绕我们如何护理老年人进行系统和政策变革。该运动首先关注的是组织层面的变革和公众认识到,基于几十年的研究,老年人并没有始终得到高质量的护理,这些研究定义了临床模式,促进了最佳实践,以解决导致老年人丧失独立性、制度化和过早死亡的条件。AFHS的参与引导医疗保健系统采用具体的、基于证据的实践,解决老年人友好护理的基本领域,即4M(重要的,药物,心理状态,活动)。通过精心设计的学习网络(协作和行动社区),利用集体实施经验,老年医学专业知识和动力来改善老年人护理,该运动已经看到了大型医疗保健系统的显著规模,如退伍军人健康管理局(VA),启动了他们自己的行动社区。随着这一重大传播,除了关于AFHS的300多篇文章外,该运动还引起了政策制定者和其他利益相关者的注意,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心通过了2025财年老年友好医院措施。4M的发展是作为一个“粘性”的证据基础,以确保实践中建议的变化可以很容易地被利益相关者理解,并且在科学上是有效的。IHI提出的最初过程措施(记录每个“M”是如何评估和管理的)和结果措施(30天再入院、急诊就诊、患者满意度和住院时间)虽然实用,但与护理质量bbb之间的联系并不明确。此外,虽然关注个体“M”的护理实践的证据基础是丰富的,但支持将所有4个M作为一个整体进行评估和管理的证据有限。Burke等人提出了更多的老年人友好型护理的全球衡量标准,这些标准反映了对老年人重要的结果,如“在家的天数”和“以患者为中心”bb0。退伍军人事务部在AFHS运动上投入了大量资金,即使没有大规模的证据表明实施4M的结果有所改善,也没有在所有护理环境中都有证据。拜耳等人的文章增加了越来越多的证据,支持在VA住院患者环境中使用4Ms作为一套。拜耳等人在文章中利用专门构建的电子病历(EMR)文档工具实现了老年友好型护理。值得注意的是,Bayer等人的评估表明,即使我们不能完全衡量这些团队的评估和临床管理,记录4M护理与更好的有意义的结果相关(减少30天再入院而不改变死亡率)。退伍军人事务部花费了相当大的努力来建立一个基于电子病历的工具来记录老年友好护理,因为早期退伍军人事务部采用老年友好护理的人认为缺乏这种电子病历文件是衡量老年友好采用和传播的障碍[5,6]。虽然全国部署的退伍军人事务部电子病历文档工具,即老年人友好型4M模板,已经允许设置更好地跟踪老年人友好型护理,当前版本的模板需要额外的文档步骤,并且尚未捕获对每个m的评估和管理。这些典型工作流程之外的额外步骤可能占住院的老年退伍军人中相对较小的百分比(2,422/55,492或4.4%),他们记录了所有4M,并有资格进行主要分析。目前的研究表明,目前的VA专用文档工具与有意义的患者结果相关;然而,可能无法优化当前的临床工作流程。其他大型医疗保健系统已经展示了成功的用于评估和管理每个“M”的专用电子病历指标,这些指标提取现有的电子病历文件,而不需要一线工作人员执行额外的数据输入[7,8]。通过额外的投资,VA EMR可以进一步用于在医疗保健环境中实施AFHS文档,并更好地集成到现有工作流程中。此外,开发一种基于emr的资源,提取并呈现4M的数据,这对临床团队在临床护理时和评估患者结果都有意义,这将是理想的。
{"title":"Keeping Our Eyes on the Prize: Embedding Age-Friendly Care as the Health System Standard for All Older Adults","authors":"Anna K. Mirk,&nbsp;Camille P. Vaughan","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70255","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70255","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) represent a movement promoted by the John A. Hartford Foundation, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and the American Hospital Association to improve the quality of care for older adults throughout United States health care systems, with an ultimate goal of systemic and policy changes around how we care for older adults [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. The movement first focused on organizational-level change and public recognition that older adults were not consistently receiving high quality care based on decades of research defining clinical models that promote best practices to address conditions that contribute to loss of independence, institutionalization, and premature death as we age [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. AFHS engagement leads health care systems to adopt specific, evidence-based practices that address the essential domains of age-friendly care, known as the 4M's (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, Mobility). Through thoughtfully designed learning networks (collaboratives and action communities) that leverage collective implementation experience, geriatrics expertise, and momentum to improve older adult care, the movement has seen significant scale up with large health care systems, like the Veterans Health Administration (VA), initiating their own action communities. With this significant spread, in addition to the over 300 articles on the AFHS, the movement has gained the attention of policy makers, and other stakeholders, with the FY2025 Age-Friendly Hospital measure adopted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 4M's were developed as a “sticky” evidence base to ensure recommended changes in practice could be easily understood by stakeholders and were scientifically valid [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. The initial process measures (documentation of how each “M” is assessed and managed) and outcome measures (30-day readmissions, emergency department visits, patient satisfaction and hospital length of stay) proposed by IHI, while pragmatic, have shown unclear links with quality of care [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. Additionally, while the evidence base for care practices focused on the individual “M”s is substantial, there is limited evidence supporting the model of assessment and management of all 4Ms as a set. Burke et al. proposed more global measures of age-friendly care that reflect outcomes important to older adults, such as “days at home” and “patient-centeredness” [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. VA has invested heavily in the AFHS movement, even without large scale evidence of improved outcomes from implementation of the 4M's as a set, nor evidence in all care settings. The article by Bayer et al. adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of the 4Ms as a set in the VA inpatient setting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The inpatient VA implementation of age-friendly care in the article by Bayer et al. leveraged a purpose-built electronic medical record (EMR) documentation tool designed to capture age-friendl","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70255","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editor's Note on Perioperative Optimization of Frail Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery 编者注:体弱老年人择期结肠直肠手术围手术期优化
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70212
Michael L. Malone
{"title":"Editor's Note on Perioperative Optimization of Frail Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery","authors":"Michael L. Malone","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70212","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145915841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Innovations in Dementia Empowerment and Action: RCT for Underserved Communities 痴呆症赋权和行动的创新:服务不足社区的随机对照试验。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70189
Karen I. Fredriksen-Goldsen, Linda Teri, Hyun-Jun Kim, Brittany Jones-Cobb, David LaFazia, Glenise McKenzie, Ryan Petros, Hailey Jung, Austin G. Oswald, Charles Hoy-Ellis, Charles Emlet

Background

Research has revealed dementia disparities among underserved older adults. Built upon standard-Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease (s-RDAD), Innovations in Dementia Empowerment and Action (IDEA) is designed and culturally tailored for underserved communities through an empowerment stigma-reduction cognitive-behavioral intervention and tested with sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults and care partners.

Methods

The study is a 2-arm (IDEA and s-RDAD), single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a staggered multiple baseline design. With 161 dyads (person living with dementia/care partner), the aim of the study is to compare the two arms via between and within group differences on primary (physical activity) and secondary outcomes (e.g., quality of life, physical functioning, and resource literacy) at post-treatment, and 30 and 56 week follow-up.

Results

When comparing the two arm between-group differences, the IDEA care partners' community resource literacy was significantly higher at 30-week follow-up than for s-RDAD (contrast = 0.10, p = 0.005). While both intervention arms demonstrated efficacy with significant improvement in physical activity (contrastIDEA = 0.10, p = 0.010; contrasts-RDAD = 0.14, p < 0.001) and quality of life (contrastIDEA = 0.06, p < 0.001; contrasts-RDAD = 0.03, p = 0.035) for the person with dementia at post-treatment, positive treatment effects on physical activity (contrastIDEA = 0.09, p = 0.032) and quality of life (contrastIDEA = 0.03, p = 0.040) persisted at 30 weeks for IDEA but not for s-RDAD.

Conclusion

While both intervention arms were efficacious, IDEA demonstrated sustained efficacy. The cultural tailoring of interventions is promising to address disparities in dementia care and interventions in underserved communities. Future research is needed for the translation of this efficacious intervention to the larger community.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03550131

背景:研究揭示了在服务不足的老年人中痴呆症的差异。在减少阿尔茨海默病残疾标准(s-RDAD)的基础上,痴呆症赋权和行动创新(IDEA)是为服务不足的社区设计和文化量身定制的,通过赋权,减少耻辱,认知行为干预,并在性和性别少数群体(SGM)成年人和护理伙伴中进行了测试。方法:采用交叉多基线设计的2组(IDEA和s-RDAD)、单盲、随机对照试验(RCT)。该研究的目的是通过治疗后30周和56周的随访,通过组内和组间主要(身体活动)和次要结果(如生活质量、身体功能和资源素养)的差异来比较两组(患有痴呆症的人/护理伙伴)。结果:当比较两组间差异时,在随访30周时,IDEA护理伙伴的社区资源素养显著高于s-RDAD(对比= 0.10,p = 0.005)。虽然两个干预组在治疗后痴呆患者的身体活动方面均表现出显著改善的疗效(对比dea = 0.10, p = 0.010;对比rdad = 0.14, p IDEA = 0.06, p s-RDAD = 0.03, p = 0.035),但在治疗30周时,IDEA组对身体活动(对比dea = 0.09, p = 0.032)和生活质量(对比dea = 0.03, p = 0.040)的积极治疗效果持续存在,而s-RDAD组则没有。结论:虽然两个干预组都有效,但IDEA表现出持续的疗效。干预措施的文化定制有望解决痴呆症护理方面的差异,并在服务不足的社区进行干预。未来的研究需要将这种有效的干预措施转化为更大的社区。临床试验:gov标识符:NCT03550131。
{"title":"Innovations in Dementia Empowerment and Action: RCT for Underserved Communities","authors":"Karen I. Fredriksen-Goldsen,&nbsp;Linda Teri,&nbsp;Hyun-Jun Kim,&nbsp;Brittany Jones-Cobb,&nbsp;David LaFazia,&nbsp;Glenise McKenzie,&nbsp;Ryan Petros,&nbsp;Hailey Jung,&nbsp;Austin G. Oswald,&nbsp;Charles Hoy-Ellis,&nbsp;Charles Emlet","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70189","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70189","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Research has revealed dementia disparities among underserved older adults. Built upon standard-Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease (s-RDAD), Innovations in Dementia Empowerment and Action (IDEA) is designed and culturally tailored for underserved communities through an empowerment stigma-reduction cognitive-behavioral intervention and tested with sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults and care partners.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study is a 2-arm (IDEA and s-RDAD), single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a staggered multiple baseline design. With 161 dyads (person living with dementia/care partner), the aim of the study is to compare the two arms via between and within group differences on primary (physical activity) and secondary outcomes (e.g., quality of life, physical functioning, and resource literacy) at post-treatment, and 30 and 56 week follow-up.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>When comparing the two arm between-group differences, the IDEA care partners' community resource literacy was significantly higher at 30-week follow-up than for s-RDAD (contrast = 0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.005). While both intervention arms demonstrated efficacy with significant improvement in physical activity (contrast<sub>IDEA</sub> = 0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.010; contrast<sub>s-RDAD</sub> = 0.14, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and quality of life (contrast<sub>IDEA</sub> = 0.06, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; contrast<sub>s-RDAD</sub> = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.035) for the person with dementia at post-treatment, positive treatment effects on physical activity (contrast<sub>IDEA</sub> = 0.09, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and quality of life (contrast<sub>IDEA</sub> = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.040) persisted at 30 weeks for IDEA but not for s-RDAD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While both intervention arms were efficacious, IDEA demonstrated sustained efficacy. The cultural tailoring of interventions is promising to address disparities in dementia care and interventions in underserved communities. Future research is needed for the translation of this efficacious intervention to the larger community.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03550131</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"119-131"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative Optimization of Frail Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery 老年人择期结肠直肠癌手术的围手术期优化。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70211
Rebecca Tang, Masaya Higuchi, Sarah E. Rudasill, Praachi Raje, Jasmine J. Johnson, Rory V. Mather, Grace C. Lee, Matthew Russell, Sindhura Pulluru, Christy Cauley, Rocco Ricciardi, Hiroko Kunitake

Background

The Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) clinic was established to address vulnerabilities and improve outcomes in frail older patients. This study describes the results of comprehensive perioperative optimization by the POSH interdisciplinary team (IDT) in patients who underwent colorectal surgery.

Methods

Frail patients planned for colorectal surgery and enrolled in the POSH clinic (10/2021–09/2023) were retrospectively identified. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings of preoperative geriatric assessment and postoperative outcomes. Outcomes were compared with a contemporary propensity-matched cohort using chi-squared analysis and two-sample t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results

Thirty-six patients with a median age of 80 years and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6.11 were planned for colorectal surgeries, most commonly colectomy (62.1%) and ostomy reversal (20.7%). Twenty-nine patients underwent surgical management after interdisciplinary optimization in the POSH clinic. The most common interventions recommended included advance care planning (86.2%), physical therapy (55.2%), and medication management (34.5%). Postoperatively, 75% of patients were discharged home, and there were no mortalities within 90 days. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes when compared to a contemporary propensity-matched cohort. The remaining seven patients enrolled in POSH did not undergo surgical management after surgery was deemed inconsistent with their goals of care, and three of these patients expired within 1 year of evaluation in POSH.

Conclusions

The POSH model provides high-risk patients with individualized risk stratification, comprehensive interdisciplinary strategies for risk mitigation, and alignment of care with patient goals. When elective colorectal surgery was within their goals of care, frail older adults safely underwent operative intervention after careful perioperative optimization. Future studies should include a mixed-method exploration of the patient perspective and a randomized controlled trial to quantify the impact of the POSH clinic on short- and long-term postoperative outcomes.

背景:老年健康围手术期优化(POSH)诊所的建立是为了解决脆弱的老年患者和改善预后。本研究描述了POSH跨学科团队(IDT)对接受结直肠手术的患者进行围手术期综合优化的结果。方法:回顾性分析在POSH诊所(2021年10月- 2023年9月)登记的计划行结直肠手术的体弱患者。描述性统计用于总结术前老年评估和术后预后的结果。结果分别采用卡方分析和分类变量和连续变量的双样本t检验与当代倾向匹配队列进行比较。结果:36例患者计划行结直肠手术,中位年龄80岁,Charlson合并症指数平均为6.11,最常见的是结肠切除术(62.1%)和造口逆转(20.7%)。29例患者在POSH诊所接受了跨学科优化后的手术治疗。推荐的最常见干预措施包括提前护理计划(86.2%)、物理治疗(55.2%)和药物管理(34.5%)。术后75%的患者出院回家,90天内无死亡病例。与当代倾向匹配队列相比,术后结果无显著差异。其余7例纳入POSH的患者在手术被认为不符合其护理目标后未接受手术治疗,其中3例患者在POSH评估后1年内死亡。结论:POSH模型为高危患者提供了个体化的风险分层,全面的跨学科风险缓解策略,并使护理与患者目标保持一致。当选择性结直肠手术在他们的护理目标范围内时,体弱多病的老年人在精心的围手术期优化后安全地接受了手术干预。未来的研究应包括从患者角度进行混合方法探索和随机对照试验,以量化POSH诊所对短期和长期术后预后的影响。
{"title":"Perioperative Optimization of Frail Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery","authors":"Rebecca Tang,&nbsp;Masaya Higuchi,&nbsp;Sarah E. Rudasill,&nbsp;Praachi Raje,&nbsp;Jasmine J. Johnson,&nbsp;Rory V. Mather,&nbsp;Grace C. Lee,&nbsp;Matthew Russell,&nbsp;Sindhura Pulluru,&nbsp;Christy Cauley,&nbsp;Rocco Ricciardi,&nbsp;Hiroko Kunitake","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70211","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70211","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) clinic was established to address vulnerabilities and improve outcomes in frail older patients. This study describes the results of comprehensive perioperative optimization by the POSH interdisciplinary team (IDT) in patients who underwent colorectal surgery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Frail patients planned for colorectal surgery and enrolled in the POSH clinic (10/2021–09/2023) were retrospectively identified. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings of preoperative geriatric assessment and postoperative outcomes. Outcomes were compared with a contemporary propensity-matched cohort using chi-squared analysis and two-sample t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty-six patients with a median age of 80 years and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6.11 were planned for colorectal surgeries, most commonly colectomy (62.1%) and ostomy reversal (20.7%). Twenty-nine patients underwent surgical management after interdisciplinary optimization in the POSH clinic. The most common interventions recommended included advance care planning (86.2%), physical therapy (55.2%), and medication management (34.5%). Postoperatively, 75% of patients were discharged home, and there were no mortalities within 90 days. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes when compared to a contemporary propensity-matched cohort. The remaining seven patients enrolled in POSH did not undergo surgical management after surgery was deemed inconsistent with their goals of care, and three of these patients expired within 1 year of evaluation in POSH.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The POSH model provides high-risk patients with individualized risk stratification, comprehensive interdisciplinary strategies for risk mitigation, and alignment of care with patient goals. When elective colorectal surgery was within their goals of care, frail older adults safely underwent operative intervention after careful perioperative optimization. Future studies should include a mixed-method exploration of the patient perspective and a randomized controlled trial to quantify the impact of the POSH clinic on short- and long-term postoperative outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"153-159"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editor's Note on Barriers and Facilitators to the Fidelity of Delirium Screening in the Emergency Department: An Ethnographic Approach 编者注:障碍和促进在急诊科谵妄筛查的保真度:民族志方法
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70236
Edward R. Marcantonio
{"title":"Editor's Note on Barriers and Facilitators to the Fidelity of Delirium Screening in the Emergency Department: An Ethnographic Approach","authors":"Edward R. Marcantonio","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70236","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145915935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sarcopenic Obesity, Not Sarcopenia or Obesity Alone, Is Independently Associated With Urinary Incontinence in Older Women 老年妇女尿失禁独立与肌肉减少性肥胖有关,而不是单纯的肌肉减少或肥胖。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70226
Neslihan Hazel Önür, Tuğba Erdoğan, Denizler Sezer, Cihan Kılıç, Serdar Özkök, Gülistan Bahat, Mehmet Akif Karan

Background

Sarcopenic obesity is a condition characterized by decreased muscle mass and strength along with an increased body fat percentage. While previous studies have separately examined the relationship between sarcopenia and obesity with urinary incontinence (UI), this study aimed to evaluate the combined impact of sarcopenic obesity on UI.

Methods

This study included 1147 female patients aged ≥ 60 years who attended a geriatrics outpatient clinic between November 2012 and June 2024. Body composition was assessed using bioimpedance analysis (BIA), and muscle strength was measured by handgrip strength. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMMI) was adjusted for body weight. Sarcopenic obesity was defined using population-specific threshold values, incorporating low muscle strength, low muscle mass, and high fat percentage. Patients were classified into four groups: non-sarcopenic non-obese, sarcopenic non-obese, sarcopenic obese, and non-sarcopenic obese. The prevalence of UI and its association with these phenotypes was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

The mean age was 74 ± 7 years. The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity was 20%, while the prevalence of UI was 49%. UI was observed in 57% of the 230 patients with sarcopenic obesity. A significant difference in UI prevalence was found among phenotypic groups (p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, sarcopenic obesity was independently associated with UI (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.16–2.85, p = 0.009). Other phenotypes were not significantly associated.

Conclusions

Sarcopenic obesity is more strongly associated with UI than sarcopenia or obesity alone. Early identification and targeted interventions may play a crucial role in mitigating the effects of UI or reducing its incidence.

背景:肌少性肥胖是一种以肌肉质量和力量减少以及体脂百分比增加为特征的疾病。虽然以往的研究分别探讨了肌肉减少症和肥胖与尿失禁(UI)之间的关系,但本研究旨在评估肌肉减少性肥胖对尿失禁的综合影响。方法:本研究纳入2012年11月至2024年6月在老年科门诊就诊的1147例年龄≥60岁的女性患者。采用生物阻抗分析(BIA)评估身体成分,通过握力测量肌肉力量。根据体重调整骨骼肌质量指数(SMMI)。肌少性肥胖的定义采用人群特异性阈值,包括低肌肉力量、低肌肉质量和高脂肪百分比。患者分为四组:非肌肉减少的非肥胖、肌肉减少的非肥胖、肌肉减少的肥胖和非肌肉减少的肥胖。使用多变量逻辑回归分析UI患病率及其与这些表型的关系。结果:患者平均年龄74±7岁。肌少性肥胖的患病率为20%,而尿失禁的患病率为49%。230例肌肉减少型肥胖患者中有57%出现尿失禁。不同表型组间尿失禁患病率存在显著差异(p)。结论:肌肉减少型肥胖与尿失禁的相关性强于肌肉减少症或单纯肥胖。早期识别和有针对性的干预可能在减轻尿失禁的影响或减少其发病率方面发挥关键作用。
{"title":"Sarcopenic Obesity, Not Sarcopenia or Obesity Alone, Is Independently Associated With Urinary Incontinence in Older Women","authors":"Neslihan Hazel Önür,&nbsp;Tuğba Erdoğan,&nbsp;Denizler Sezer,&nbsp;Cihan Kılıç,&nbsp;Serdar Özkök,&nbsp;Gülistan Bahat,&nbsp;Mehmet Akif Karan","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70226","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70226","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sarcopenic obesity is a condition characterized by decreased muscle mass and strength along with an increased body fat percentage. While previous studies have separately examined the relationship between sarcopenia and obesity with urinary incontinence (UI), this study aimed to evaluate the combined impact of sarcopenic obesity on UI.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study included 1147 female patients aged ≥ 60 years who attended a geriatrics outpatient clinic between November 2012 and June 2024. Body composition was assessed using bioimpedance analysis (BIA), and muscle strength was measured by handgrip strength. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMMI) was adjusted for body weight. Sarcopenic obesity was defined using population-specific threshold values, incorporating low muscle strength, low muscle mass, and high fat percentage. Patients were classified into four groups: non-sarcopenic non-obese, sarcopenic non-obese, sarcopenic obese, and non-sarcopenic obese. The prevalence of UI and its association with these phenotypes was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The mean age was 74 ± 7 years. The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity was 20%, while the prevalence of UI was 49%. UI was observed in 57% of the 230 patients with sarcopenic obesity. A significant difference in UI prevalence was found among phenotypic groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, sarcopenic obesity was independently associated with UI (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.16–2.85, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Other phenotypes were not significantly associated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sarcopenic obesity is more strongly associated with UI than sarcopenia or obesity alone. Early identification and targeted interventions may play a crucial role in mitigating the effects of UI or reducing its incidence.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fool Me Once: A Case of Recurrent Delirium in the Setting of Buprenorphine Use 愚弄我一次:丁丙诺啡使用后复发性谵妄1例。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70227
Yasmeen Abdo, Camila S. Badell, Abeer Qasim, Eloy F. Ruiz

{"title":"Fool Me Once: A Case of Recurrent Delirium in the Setting of Buprenorphine Use","authors":"Yasmeen Abdo,&nbsp;Camila S. Badell,&nbsp;Abeer Qasim,&nbsp;Eloy F. Ruiz","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70227","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70227","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure>\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"302-304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145644014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Learning How Preoperative Communication Relates to Postoperative Experiences for Older Veterans Having Inguinal Hernia Surgery 学习术前沟通与老年退伍军人腹股沟疝手术术后经验的关系。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.70216
Melissa A. Thornton, Elisa L. Marten, Nicole Lunardi, Don Mai, Cameron Macdonald, Jocelyn G. Baker, Ava Hitzeman, Celette Sugg Skinner, Cynthia J. Brown, Miles Berger, Simon Craddock Lee, C. Munro Cullum, Konstantinos I. Makris, Thai H. Pham, Aanand Naik, Victoria Tang, Courtney J. Balentine

Background

For older adults to decide whether inguinal hernia repair will meaningfully improve their lives, it is critical to (1) understand how the operation affects them and whether it enhances outcomes that matter to them, and (2) identify ways to improve how surgeons discuss the benefits of surgery and how they prepare older adults for postoperative recovery.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 Veterans ≥ 65 years old who had inguinal hernia repair at two high-volume Veterans Affairs hospitals.

Results

Participants were all men; their mean age was 73 years, 65% were White, and 33% were Black. Older adults felt that the surgical team provided excellent reassurance regarding the safety and efficacy of surgery but expressed a desire for improved listening during preoperative counseling and for clearer communication regarding the reality of postoperative recovery. Veterans reported a return to baseline physical and cognitive function between 2 days and 6 weeks after surgery, though two Veterans experienced significant short-term cognitive dysfunction. Those who reported dissatisfaction with preoperative communication were more likely to be surprised or concerned about postoperative symptoms.

Conclusions

Our study provides critical information on how hernia repair affects the lives of older adults, and this can be used to better prepare the patients for surgery and to help them decide whether surgery will meaningfully enhance their quality of life.

背景:对于老年人来说,决定腹股沟疝修补是否会有意义地改善他们的生活,至关重要的是:(1)了解手术如何影响他们,是否能提高对他们重要的结果,以及(2)确定如何改进外科医生讨论手术益处的方法,以及他们如何为老年人术后恢复做好准备。方法:我们对40名≥65岁在两家大容量退伍军人医院行腹股沟疝修补术的退伍军人进行半结构化访谈。结果:参与者均为男性;平均年龄73岁,白人占65%,黑人占33%。老年人认为手术团队对手术的安全性和有效性提供了很好的保证,但他们表示希望在术前咨询时更好地倾听,并就术后恢复的现实进行更清晰的沟通。据报道,退伍军人在手术后2天至6周内恢复了基本的身体和认知功能,尽管有两名退伍军人出现了明显的短期认知功能障碍。那些对术前沟通不满意的患者更可能对术后症状感到惊讶或担忧。结论:我们的研究提供了关于疝修补如何影响老年人生活的重要信息,这可以用来更好地为患者做手术准备,并帮助他们决定手术是否会有意义地提高他们的生活质量。
{"title":"Learning How Preoperative Communication Relates to Postoperative Experiences for Older Veterans Having Inguinal Hernia Surgery","authors":"Melissa A. Thornton,&nbsp;Elisa L. Marten,&nbsp;Nicole Lunardi,&nbsp;Don Mai,&nbsp;Cameron Macdonald,&nbsp;Jocelyn G. Baker,&nbsp;Ava Hitzeman,&nbsp;Celette Sugg Skinner,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Brown,&nbsp;Miles Berger,&nbsp;Simon Craddock Lee,&nbsp;C. Munro Cullum,&nbsp;Konstantinos I. Makris,&nbsp;Thai H. Pham,&nbsp;Aanand Naik,&nbsp;Victoria Tang,&nbsp;Courtney J. Balentine","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70216","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.70216","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For older adults to decide whether inguinal hernia repair will meaningfully improve their lives, it is critical to (1) understand how the operation affects them and whether it enhances outcomes that matter to them, and (2) identify ways to improve how surgeons discuss the benefits of surgery and how they prepare older adults for postoperative recovery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 Veterans ≥ 65 years old who had inguinal hernia repair at two high-volume Veterans Affairs hospitals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants were all men; their mean age was 73 years, 65% were White, and 33% were Black. Older adults felt that the surgical team provided excellent reassurance regarding the safety and efficacy of surgery but expressed a desire for improved listening during preoperative counseling and for clearer communication regarding the reality of postoperative recovery. Veterans reported a return to baseline physical and cognitive function between 2 days and 6 weeks after surgery, though two Veterans experienced significant short-term cognitive dysfunction. Those who reported dissatisfaction with preoperative communication were more likely to be surprised or concerned about postoperative symptoms.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our study provides critical information on how hernia repair affects the lives of older adults, and this can be used to better prepare the patients for surgery and to help them decide whether surgery will meaningfully enhance their quality of life.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 1","pages":"177-185"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1