Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine for paediatric premedication: A randomized study.

N Kumari, P K Dubey, S Singh
{"title":"Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine for paediatric premedication: A randomized study.","authors":"N Kumari, P K Dubey, S Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Paediatric patients are given premedication in order to decrease preoperative anxiety, allow smooth induction, and prevent postoperative psychological insult and behavioural changes. A child friendly method of administration is desirable. We compared intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine and ketamine in the operating room environment, to evaluate the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) score at the time of establishing intravenous access for induction of general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care center. One hundred patients, 2-10 years of age, ASA physical status 1 & 2, scheduled for general anaesthesia were enrolled. Patient's presedation behaviour was assessed by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale Short Form (mYPAS-SF). Patients in Group D received Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg intranasally, and patients in Group K received Ketamine 5 mg/kg intranasally. After 45 min, patients were transferred to the operating table where intravenous cannulation was carried out and the response to needle insertion was assessed by FLACC scale. Vital signs, including the pulse-oximetry, heart rate and respiratory rate were monitored. Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and agitation were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher FLACC score was seen in Group D as compared to Group K (p = 0.001). The mean heart rate between two groups was found to be significantly (p = 0.001) lower in Group D compared to Group K. However, the proportion of adverse events was 8% in patients who received ketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intranasal ketamine in a dose of 5 mg/kg is clinically more effective as premedication in children aged 2-10 years in comparison with intranasal dexmedetomidine in a dose of 1 mcg/kg.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2024.07.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Paediatric patients are given premedication in order to decrease preoperative anxiety, allow smooth induction, and prevent postoperative psychological insult and behavioural changes. A child friendly method of administration is desirable. We compared intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine and ketamine in the operating room environment, to evaluate the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) score at the time of establishing intravenous access for induction of general anaesthesia.

Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care center. One hundred patients, 2-10 years of age, ASA physical status 1 & 2, scheduled for general anaesthesia were enrolled. Patient's presedation behaviour was assessed by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale Short Form (mYPAS-SF). Patients in Group D received Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg intranasally, and patients in Group K received Ketamine 5 mg/kg intranasally. After 45 min, patients were transferred to the operating table where intravenous cannulation was carried out and the response to needle insertion was assessed by FLACC scale. Vital signs, including the pulse-oximetry, heart rate and respiratory rate were monitored. Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and agitation were also recorded.

Results: A significantly higher FLACC score was seen in Group D as compared to Group K (p = 0.001). The mean heart rate between two groups was found to be significantly (p = 0.001) lower in Group D compared to Group K. However, the proportion of adverse events was 8% in patients who received ketamine.

Conclusions: Intranasal ketamine in a dose of 5 mg/kg is clinically more effective as premedication in children aged 2-10 years in comparison with intranasal dexmedetomidine in a dose of 1 mcg/kg.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内右美托咪定与氯胺酮用于儿科预处理的比较:随机研究。
导言和目的:对儿科患者进行术前用药,是为了减少术前焦虑,使诱导顺利进行,并防止术后心理损伤和行为改变。最好能采用适合儿童的给药方法。我们比较了在手术室环境中鼻腔内给药右美托咪定和氯胺酮的情况,以评估在建立静脉通路进行全身麻醉诱导时的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和可安慰性(FLACC)评分:这项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验在一家三级医疗中心进行。100 名年龄在 2-10 岁之间、ASA 身体状况为 1 和 2 级、计划进行全身麻醉的患者被纳入试验。患者的术前行为通过改良的耶鲁术前焦虑量表简表(mYPAS-SF)进行评估。D 组患者鼻内注射右美托咪定 1 毫克/千克,K 组患者鼻内注射氯胺酮 5 毫克/千克。45 分钟后,患者被转移到手术台上,在手术台上进行静脉插管,并通过 FLACC 量表评估患者对针头插入的反应。监测生命体征,包括脉搏氧饱和度、心率和呼吸频率。此外,还记录了恶心、呕吐和躁动等副作用:与 K 组相比,D 组的 FLACC 评分明显更高(P = 0.001)。D组患者的平均心率明显低于K组患者(P = 0.001),但接受氯胺酮治疗的患者发生不良反应的比例为8%:结论:在2-10岁儿童中,5毫克/千克剂量的氯胺酮鼻内注射与1微克/千克剂量的右美托咪定鼻内注射相比,前者的临床效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Valsalva sinus aneurysm leading to spontaneous closure in congenital ventricular septal defect Extubation failure: Upper airway obstruction by chewing gum. A case report The efficacy of the ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block versus the classic paravertebral block in patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized controlled study QT-prolongation in patients with severe COVID-19 is multicausal and not limited to anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs National survey on perioperative monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants: MonACOD survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1