Antibacterial susceptibility of staphylococcus aureus, salmonella typhi, bacillus subtilis and escherichia coli to snail slime.

Dorcas E Agada, Terdzungwe T Sar, John Adole Ujoh, Linus O Ameh
{"title":"Antibacterial susceptibility of staphylococcus aureus, salmonella typhi, bacillus subtilis and escherichia coli to snail slime.","authors":"Dorcas E Agada, Terdzungwe T Sar, John Adole Ujoh, Linus O Ameh","doi":"10.4314/ahs.v23i4.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emanation of multi-drugs resistant microorganisms and the challenges faced in combating multi-drug resistant infections is a public health issue and this has increased the search for effective antibiotics from natural sources.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This work aims to determine the susceptibility of some pathogenic bacterial species to snail slime.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The antibacterial activity of aqueous and ethanolic snail slime extracts were investigated against <i>Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, Bacillus subtilis</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> using the agar well diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that all the organisms were sensitive to both extracts but were more susceptible to aqueous extracts; the highest zone of inhibition for aqueous extracts was 27.33mm ± 2.51mm for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> at concentration of 1000µl/ml, while the lowest was 11.33mm ± 1.53mm against <i>Escherichia coli</i>. The highest zone of inhibition for ethanolic fraction was 15.67 ± 1.15mm for Salmonella typhi. The lowest inhibition was 9.33mm ± 0.58mm for <i>Escherichia coli</i>. The MIC was 3.125% for <i>Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> and 6.25% for <i>S. typhi</i>. The extracts were not cidal at the concentrations used. Statistical analysis revealed that the treatments between the aqueous and ethanolic extracts against <i>Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Salmonella typhi</i> were significant (p ≤ 0.05). The treatment against <i>B. subtilis</i> showed no significant difference between the two extracts (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has revealed that snail slime possesses antibacterial properties which can be used as anti-microbial agents against infectious diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94295,"journal":{"name":"African health sciences","volume":"23 4","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v23i4.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The emanation of multi-drugs resistant microorganisms and the challenges faced in combating multi-drug resistant infections is a public health issue and this has increased the search for effective antibiotics from natural sources.

Objectives: This work aims to determine the susceptibility of some pathogenic bacterial species to snail slime.

Methods: The antibacterial activity of aqueous and ethanolic snail slime extracts were investigated against Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli using the agar well diffusion method.

Results: The results showed that all the organisms were sensitive to both extracts but were more susceptible to aqueous extracts; the highest zone of inhibition for aqueous extracts was 27.33mm ± 2.51mm for Staphylococcus aureus at concentration of 1000µl/ml, while the lowest was 11.33mm ± 1.53mm against Escherichia coli. The highest zone of inhibition for ethanolic fraction was 15.67 ± 1.15mm for Salmonella typhi. The lowest inhibition was 9.33mm ± 0.58mm for Escherichia coli. The MIC was 3.125% for Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli and 6.25% for S. typhi. The extracts were not cidal at the concentrations used. Statistical analysis revealed that the treatments between the aqueous and ethanolic extracts against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi were significant (p ≤ 0.05). The treatment against B. subtilis showed no significant difference between the two extracts (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: This study has revealed that snail slime possesses antibacterial properties which can be used as anti-microbial agents against infectious diseases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金黄色葡萄球菌、伤寒沙门氏菌、枯草杆菌和大肠埃希氏菌对蜗牛粘液的抗菌敏感性。
背景:多重耐药微生物的出现以及抗击多重耐药感染所面临的挑战是一个公共卫生问题,这增加了从天然来源寻找有效抗生素的难度:本研究旨在确定一些致病细菌对蜗牛粘液的敏感性:方法:采用琼脂井扩散法研究了蜗牛粘液水提取物和乙醇提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌、伤寒沙门氏菌、枯草杆菌和大肠杆菌的抗菌活性:结果表明,所有生物对两种提取物都很敏感,但对水提取物更敏感;在 1000µl/ml 浓度下,水提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌的最大抑菌区为 27.33mm ± 2.51mm,而对大肠杆菌的最小抑菌区为 11.33mm ± 1.53mm。乙醇馏分对伤寒沙门氏菌的最大抑菌区为 15.67±1.15 毫米。对大肠埃希菌的最小抑菌作用为 9.33mm ± 0.58mm。对金黄色葡萄球菌、枯草芽孢杆菌和大肠埃希菌的最小抑菌浓度为 3.125%,对伤寒沙门氏菌的最小抑菌浓度为 6.25%。在使用的浓度下,提取物没有杀菌作用。统计分析显示,水提取物和乙醇提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和伤寒沙门氏菌的处理效果显著(p ≤ 0.05)。结论:这项研究揭示了蜗牛粘液具有抗菌特性,可用作抗微生物剂来防治传染病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The realities of adolescent sexual behaviours in Nigeria: a narrative review Factors influencing utilisation of cervical cancer screening services among HIV positive women attending care and treatment centres in Kinondoni municipality, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania A comparative assessment of CD4 recovery in a cohort of patients on different HAART regimens in a Nigerian tertiary healthcare facility Effect of early sexual initiation on early high fertility, termination of pregnancy and child death in Ethiopia using Ethiopian DHS 2000-2016 Motives and consequences of musculoskeletal injuries management at traditional bone setting centers rather than hospital orthopedic departments in Khartoum, Sudan 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1