Impact of Data Assimilation in Sensitive Features on the Predictability of the 2012 Great Arctic Cyclone

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1029/2023JD038851
Zhihong Chen, Aaron Johnson, Xuguang Wang
{"title":"Impact of Data Assimilation in Sensitive Features on the Predictability of the 2012 Great Arctic Cyclone","authors":"Zhihong Chen,&nbsp;Aaron Johnson,&nbsp;Xuguang Wang","doi":"10.1029/2023JD038851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Great Arctic Cyclone 2012 (AC12) is used to understand the role of initial condition errors in the predictability at 2–3-day forecast range of a high-impact summer Arctic Cyclone (AC). Ensemble sensitivity analysis (ESA) is first performed to identify potentially sensitive regions of the cyclone evolution using an ensemble baseline forecast with conventional in situ observations assimilated. A pseudo-observation method is then introduced to investigate impacts of hypothetical observations in these sensitive but unobserved regions. In the baseline experiments with in situ observations assimilated, the forecasted AC12 reaches its peak intensity 18 hr earlier than in the verifying Global Forecast System Analysis (GFS-ANL) and the cyclone track is biased toward the southwest. Using ESA, the time of peak intensity and the cyclone track error are identified to be sensitive to the upstream trough, downstream ridge, and the tropopause polar vortex (TPV) to the northeast (NE TPV) of the AC12. These features were not observed by the in situ observation networks. To examine the impact of the observation gaps, pseudo-observations drawn from GFS-ANL are assimilated. Pseudo-observations sample the three features separately to study the impact of the initial condition error on the predictability of AC12. The cyclone peak intensity timing error and track error are greatly reduced when the initial condition error is reduced near the NE TPV. A southward expansion of the NE TPV and the corresponding southward shifting low-level front lead the forecasted AC12 to progress to the east, which better agrees with the verifying GFS-ANL.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JD038851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Great Arctic Cyclone 2012 (AC12) is used to understand the role of initial condition errors in the predictability at 2–3-day forecast range of a high-impact summer Arctic Cyclone (AC). Ensemble sensitivity analysis (ESA) is first performed to identify potentially sensitive regions of the cyclone evolution using an ensemble baseline forecast with conventional in situ observations assimilated. A pseudo-observation method is then introduced to investigate impacts of hypothetical observations in these sensitive but unobserved regions. In the baseline experiments with in situ observations assimilated, the forecasted AC12 reaches its peak intensity 18 hr earlier than in the verifying Global Forecast System Analysis (GFS-ANL) and the cyclone track is biased toward the southwest. Using ESA, the time of peak intensity and the cyclone track error are identified to be sensitive to the upstream trough, downstream ridge, and the tropopause polar vortex (TPV) to the northeast (NE TPV) of the AC12. These features were not observed by the in situ observation networks. To examine the impact of the observation gaps, pseudo-observations drawn from GFS-ANL are assimilated. Pseudo-observations sample the three features separately to study the impact of the initial condition error on the predictability of AC12. The cyclone peak intensity timing error and track error are greatly reduced when the initial condition error is reduced near the NE TPV. A southward expansion of the NE TPV and the corresponding southward shifting low-level front lead the forecasted AC12 to progress to the east, which better agrees with the verifying GFS-ANL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敏感特征数据同化对 2012 年北极大气旋可预测性的影响
利用 2012 年大北极气旋(AC12)来了解初始条件误差在 2-3 天预报范围内高影响夏季北极气旋(AC)可预测性中的作用。首先进行集合敏感性分析(ESA),利用集合基线预报和常规现场观测同化,确定气旋演变的潜在敏感区域。然后引入伪观测方法,研究假设观测对这些敏感但未观测区域的影响。在原地观测同化的基线试验中,预报的 AC12 达到峰值强度的时间比验证全球预报系统分析(GFS-ANL)的时间早 18 小时,气旋路径偏向西南。利用 ESA,可以确定强度峰值时间和气旋路径误差对 AC12 的上游槽、下游脊和东北部对流层顶极地涡旋(TPV)很敏感。现场观测网络没有观测到这些特征。为了检验观测缺口的影响,对来自 GFS-ANL 的伪观测数据进行了同化。伪观测分别对这三个特征进行采样,以研究初始条件误差对 AC12 预测性的影响。当初始条件误差减小到东北TPV附近时,气旋峰值强度时间误差和路径误差大大减小。东北冠状副热带高压的南伸和相应的低层锋的南移导致预报的AC12向东移动,这与验证的GFS-ANL更吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
期刊最新文献
Using Iron Stable Isotopes to Quantify the Origins of the Cryoconite Iron Materials in Western China and Exploring Controlling Factors Novel Comparison of Pyrocumulonimbus Updrafts to Volcanic Eruptions and Supercell Thunderstorms Using Optical Flow Techniques Methane Emissions From Seabed to Atmosphere in Polar Oceans Revealed by Direct Methane Flux Measurements The Potential Role of Seasonal Surface Heating on the Chaotic Origins of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation Spring Predictability Barrier Asymmetry in the Diurnal Variation of Land Surface Albedo and Its Impacts on Daily Mean Albedo Estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1