Quantitative transport mapping of multi-delay arterial spin labeling MRI detects early blood perfusion alterations in Alzheimer's disease.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's Research & Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1186/s13195-024-01524-6
Yihao Guo, Liangdong Zhou, Yi Li, Gloria C Chiang, Tao Liu, Huijuan Chen, Weiyuan Huang, Mony J de Leon, Yi Wang, Feng Chen
{"title":"Quantitative transport mapping of multi-delay arterial spin labeling MRI detects early blood perfusion alterations in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Yihao Guo, Liangdong Zhou, Yi Li, Gloria C Chiang, Tao Liu, Huijuan Chen, Weiyuan Huang, Mony J de Leon, Yi Wang, Feng Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01524-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) of blood velocity, based on the transport equation has been demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity of perfusion quantification than the traditional Kety's method-based cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study aimed to investigate the associations between QTM velocity and cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using multiple post-labeling delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 128 subjects (21 normal controls (NC), 80 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 27 AD) were recruited prospectively. All participants underwent MRI examination and neuropsychological evaluation. QTM velocity and traditional CBF maps were computed from multiple delay ASL. Regional quantitative perfusion measurements were performed and compared to study group differences. We tested the hypothesis that cognition declines with reduced cerebral blood perfusion with consideration of age and gender effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cortical gray matter (GM) and the hippocampus, QTM velocity and CBF showed decreased values in the AD group compared to NC and MCI groups; QTM velocity, but not CBF, showed a significant difference between MCI and NC groups. QTM velocity and CBF showed values decreasing with age; QTM velocity, but not CBF, showed a significant gender difference between male and female. QTM velocity and CBF in the hippocampus were positively correlated with cognition, including global cognition, memory, executive function, and language function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated an increased sensitivity of QTM velocity as compared with the traditional Kety's method-based CBF. Specifically, we observed only in QTM velocity, reduced perfusion velocity in GM and the hippocampus in MCI compared with NC. Both QTM velocity and CBF demonstrated a reduction in AD vs. controls. Decreased QTM velocity and CBF in the hippocampus were correlated with poor cognitive measures. These findings suggest QTM velocity as potential biomarker for early AD blood perfusion alterations and it could provide an avenue for early intervention of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01524-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) of blood velocity, based on the transport equation has been demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity of perfusion quantification than the traditional Kety's method-based cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study aimed to investigate the associations between QTM velocity and cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using multiple post-labeling delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI.

Methods: A total of 128 subjects (21 normal controls (NC), 80 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 27 AD) were recruited prospectively. All participants underwent MRI examination and neuropsychological evaluation. QTM velocity and traditional CBF maps were computed from multiple delay ASL. Regional quantitative perfusion measurements were performed and compared to study group differences. We tested the hypothesis that cognition declines with reduced cerebral blood perfusion with consideration of age and gender effects.

Results: In cortical gray matter (GM) and the hippocampus, QTM velocity and CBF showed decreased values in the AD group compared to NC and MCI groups; QTM velocity, but not CBF, showed a significant difference between MCI and NC groups. QTM velocity and CBF showed values decreasing with age; QTM velocity, but not CBF, showed a significant gender difference between male and female. QTM velocity and CBF in the hippocampus were positively correlated with cognition, including global cognition, memory, executive function, and language function.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated an increased sensitivity of QTM velocity as compared with the traditional Kety's method-based CBF. Specifically, we observed only in QTM velocity, reduced perfusion velocity in GM and the hippocampus in MCI compared with NC. Both QTM velocity and CBF demonstrated a reduction in AD vs. controls. Decreased QTM velocity and CBF in the hippocampus were correlated with poor cognitive measures. These findings suggest QTM velocity as potential biomarker for early AD blood perfusion alterations and it could provide an avenue for early intervention of AD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多延迟动脉自旋标记磁共振成像的定量传输图检测阿尔茨海默病的早期血液灌注改变。
背景:与传统的基于Kety方法的脑血流(CBF)相比,基于运输方程的血流速度定量运输图(QTM)已被证明具有更高的灌注定量准确性和灵敏度。本研究旨在利用多次标记后延迟动脉自旋标记(ASL)核磁共振成像研究 QTM 速度与阿尔茨海默病(AD)认知功能之间的关联:方法:前瞻性地招募了128名受试者(21名正常对照组(NC)、80名轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和27名阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者)。所有受试者均接受了磁共振成像检查和神经心理学评估。通过多延迟 ASL 计算出 QTM 速度和传统 CBF 图。进行了区域定量灌注测量,并与研究组差异进行了比较。我们测试了认知能力随脑血流灌注减少而下降的假设,并考虑了年龄和性别的影响:在皮层灰质(GM)和海马中,与 NC 组和 MCI 组相比,AD 组的 QTM 速度和 CBF 值均有所下降;MCI 组和 NC 组之间的 QTM 速度有显著差异,但 CBF 没有。QTM速度和CBF值随年龄增长而下降;QTM速度(而非CBF)在男性和女性之间存在显著的性别差异。海马区的 QTM 速度和 CBF 与认知(包括整体认知、记忆、执行功能和语言功能)呈正相关:本研究表明,与传统的基于 Kety's 方法的 CBF 相比,QTM 速度的灵敏度更高。具体而言,我们仅在 QTM 速度中观察到,与 NC 相比,MCI 患者 GM 和海马灌注速度降低。与对照组相比,AD 患者的 QTM 速度和 CBF 均有所下降。海马中QTM速度和CBF的降低与认知能力差有关。这些研究结果表明,QTM速度是AD早期血液灌注改变的潜在生物标志物,可为AD的早期干预提供途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
TRanscranial AlterNating current stimulation FOR patients with mild Alzheimer’s Disease (TRANSFORM-AD): a randomized controlled clinical trial Impact of amyloid and cardiometabolic risk factors on prognostic capacity of plasma neurofilament light chain for neurodegeneration Clinical, neuropathological, and molecular characteristics of rapidly progressive dementia with Lewy bodies: a distinct clinicopathological entity? Mitigation of synaptic and memory impairments via F-actin stabilization in Alzheimer's disease. CSF neurogranin levels as a biomarker in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a cross-sectional analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1