How to verify and validate a clinical microbiology test before it can be used in routine diagnostics: a practical guide

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.06.028
{"title":"How to verify and validate a clinical microbiology test before it can be used in routine diagnostics: a practical guide","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.06.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Before a new test can be routinely used in your laboratory, its reliability must be established in the laboratory where it will be used. International standards demand validation and verification procedures for new tests. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 was recently updated, and the European Commission's <em>In Vitro</em> Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) came into effect. These events will likely increase the need for validation and verification procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This paper aims to provide practical guidance in validating or verifying microbiology tests, including antimicrobial susceptibility tests in a clinical microbiology laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><p>It summarizes and interprets certain parts of standards such as ISO 15189:2022, and regulations, such as IVDR 2017/746 regarding validation or verification of a new test in a routine clinical microbiology laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Content</h3><p>The reasons for choosing a new test and the outline of the validation and verification plan are discussed. Furthermore, the following topics are touched upon: the choice of reference standard, number of samples, testing procedures, how to solve the discrepancies between results from new test and reference standard, and acceptance criteria. Arguments for selecting certain parameters (such as reference standard and sample size) and examples are given.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>With the expected increase in validation and verification procedures because of the implementation of IVDR, this paper may aid in planning and executing these procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X24003094/pdfft?md5=64500cefc231bc624b5fa1df88bd3da7&pid=1-s2.0-S1198743X24003094-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X24003094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Before a new test can be routinely used in your laboratory, its reliability must be established in the laboratory where it will be used. International standards demand validation and verification procedures for new tests. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 was recently updated, and the European Commission's In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) came into effect. These events will likely increase the need for validation and verification procedures.

Objectives

This paper aims to provide practical guidance in validating or verifying microbiology tests, including antimicrobial susceptibility tests in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Sources

It summarizes and interprets certain parts of standards such as ISO 15189:2022, and regulations, such as IVDR 2017/746 regarding validation or verification of a new test in a routine clinical microbiology laboratory.

Content

The reasons for choosing a new test and the outline of the validation and verification plan are discussed. Furthermore, the following topics are touched upon: the choice of reference standard, number of samples, testing procedures, how to solve the discrepancies between results from new test and reference standard, and acceptance criteria. Arguments for selecting certain parameters (such as reference standard and sample size) and examples are given.

Implications

With the expected increase in validation and verification procedures because of the implementation of IVDR, this paper may aid in planning and executing these procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在临床微生物学检验用于常规诊断之前对其进行验证和确认,实用指南。
背景:在实验室常规使用一种新检验之前,必须在使用该检验的实验室中确定其可靠性。国际标准要求对新检验项目进行确认和验证程序。国际标准化组织(ISO)15189 最近进行了更新,欧盟委员会的体外诊断法规(IVDR)也已生效。这些事件可能会增加对确认和验证程序的需求:本文旨在为临床微生物实验室验证或核查微生物检验(包括抗菌药物敏感性检验)提供实用指导:本文总结并解读了ISO 15189: 20222等标准和IVDR 2017/745等法规:内容:讨论了选择新检验项目的原因以及验证和确认计划的大纲。此外,还涉及以下主题:参考标准的选择、样品数量、测试程序、如何解决新测试结果与参考标准之间的差异以及验收标准。文中还给出了选择某些参数(如参考标准和样品数量)的理由和示例:随着 IVDR 的实施,预计验证和确认程序将会增加,本文可帮助规划和执行这些程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Real-world effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalised adults with Covid-19: a population-based, retrospective cohort study cohort study. A phase 3 randomized trial of sulopenem vs. ertapenem in patients with complicated intraabdominal infections. Re: 'Heightened incidence of adverse events associated with a live attenuated varicella vaccine strain that lacks critical genetic polymorphisms in ORF62' by Kang et al. Epidemiology of human metapneumovirus among children with severe or very severe pneumonia in high pneumonia burden settings: the PERCH study experience. 'Measurement of circulating viral antigens post-SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multicohort study' - Author's reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1