How L2 Learners Process Different Means of Time Encoding in a Tenseless Language: An ERP Study of Mandarin.

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s10936-024-10097-2
Yuxin Hao, Xun Duan, Sicong Zha, Tingting Xu
{"title":"How L2 Learners Process Different Means of Time Encoding in a Tenseless Language: An ERP Study of Mandarin.","authors":"Yuxin Hao, Xun Duan, Sicong Zha, Tingting Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10936-024-10097-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past, research on the cognitive neural mechanism of second language (L2) learners' processing time information has focused on Indo-European languages. It has also focused on the temporal category expressed by morphological changes. However, there has been a lack of research on L2 learners' various time coding means, especially for Mandarin, which lacks morphological changes. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we investigated the cognitive neural mechanism of L2 learners with native Indonesian background in processing two time coding means (time adverbs and aspect markers) in Chinese. Indonesian has time adverb encoding time information similar to that of Chinese, but there are no aspect markers similar to Chinese in Indonesian. We measured ERPs time locked to the time adverb \" (cengjing)\" and the aspect marker \"verb + (verb + guo)\" in two different conditions, i.e., a control condition (the correct sentence) and a temporal information violation. The experimental results showed that the native speaker group induced the biphasic N400-P600 effect under the condition of time adverb violation, and induced P600 under the condition of the aspect marker \"verb + (verb + guo)\" violation. Indonesian L2 learners of Chinese only elicited P600 for the violation of time adverbs, and there was no statistically significant N400 similar to that of Chinese native speakers. In the case of aspect marker violation, we observed no significant ERPs component for the Indonesian L2 learners of Chinese. Both groups of subjects induced elicited a widely distributed and sustained negativity on the post-critical words after \"verb + (verb + guo)\" and \"(cengjing)\". This showed that the neural mechanism of Indonesian L2 learners of Chinese processing Chinese time coding differs from that of Chinese native speakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psycholinguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10097-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past, research on the cognitive neural mechanism of second language (L2) learners' processing time information has focused on Indo-European languages. It has also focused on the temporal category expressed by morphological changes. However, there has been a lack of research on L2 learners' various time coding means, especially for Mandarin, which lacks morphological changes. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we investigated the cognitive neural mechanism of L2 learners with native Indonesian background in processing two time coding means (time adverbs and aspect markers) in Chinese. Indonesian has time adverb encoding time information similar to that of Chinese, but there are no aspect markers similar to Chinese in Indonesian. We measured ERPs time locked to the time adverb " (cengjing)" and the aspect marker "verb + (verb + guo)" in two different conditions, i.e., a control condition (the correct sentence) and a temporal information violation. The experimental results showed that the native speaker group induced the biphasic N400-P600 effect under the condition of time adverb violation, and induced P600 under the condition of the aspect marker "verb + (verb + guo)" violation. Indonesian L2 learners of Chinese only elicited P600 for the violation of time adverbs, and there was no statistically significant N400 similar to that of Chinese native speakers. In the case of aspect marker violation, we observed no significant ERPs component for the Indonesian L2 learners of Chinese. Both groups of subjects induced elicited a widely distributed and sustained negativity on the post-critical words after "verb + (verb + guo)" and "(cengjing)". This showed that the neural mechanism of Indonesian L2 learners of Chinese processing Chinese time coding differs from that of Chinese native speakers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二语言学习者如何处理无符号语言中的不同时间编码方式?普通话的 ERP 研究。
过去,对第二语言(L2)学习者处理时间信息的认知神经机制的研究主要集中在印欧语言上。此外,研究还集中于形态变化所表达的时间范畴。然而,对于第二语言学习者的各种时间编码手段,尤其是对于缺乏形态变化的普通话的时间编码手段,一直缺乏研究。我们利用事件相关电位(ERPs)研究了母语为印尼语的 L2 学习者处理汉语中两种时间编码手段(时间副词和方面标记)的认知神经机制。印尼语中有与汉语类似的时间副词编码时间信息,但印尼语中没有与汉语类似的方面标记。我们在两种不同的条件下,即对照条件(正确的句子)和时间信息违反条件下,测量了锁定在时间副词"(cengjing)"和方面标记 "动词+(动词+guo)"上的ERP时间。实验结果表明,在时间副词违规条件下,母语组诱发了双相N400-P600效应;在方面标记 "动词+(动词+guo)"违规条件下,母语组诱发了P600效应。印尼汉语二级学习者只在时间副词违例的情况下诱发 P600,与汉语母语学习者相似的 N400 在统计上并不显著。在违反方面标记的情况下,我们在印尼汉语学习者身上没有观察到明显的ERPs成分。在 "动词+(动词+guo)"和"(cengjing)"之后,两组受试者都诱发了广泛分布且持续的否定。这表明印尼汉语学习者处理汉语时间编码的神经机制与汉语母语者不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research publishes carefully selected papers from the several disciplines engaged in psycholinguistic research, providing a single, recognized medium for communications among linguists, psychologists, biologists, sociologists, and others. The journal covers a broad range of approaches to the study of the communicative process, including: the social and anthropological bases of communication; development of speech and language; semantics (problems in linguistic meaning); and biological foundations. Papers dealing with the psychopathology of language and cognition, and the neuropsychology of language and cognition, are also included.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Expression of Concern: Artificial Intelligence Technologies in College English Translation Teaching. How L2 Learners Process Different Means of Time Encoding in a Tenseless Language: An ERP Study of Mandarin. An ERP Study on the Processing of Subject-Verb and Object-Verb Gender Agreement in Punjabi. Correction: The Effect of Syntactic Similarity on Intra-Sentential Switching Costs: Evidence from Chinese-English Bilinguals. Analyzing the Influence of Ambiguity Tolerance on Grammar Acquisition in EFL Learners Across Face-to-Face, Blended, and Flipped Learning Environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1