Exploring the effects of post operative hyperoxic intermittent stimuli on reticulocyte levels in cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.

Maher Khalife, Michele Salvagno, Maurice Sosnowski, Costantino Balestra
{"title":"Exploring the effects of post operative hyperoxic intermittent stimuli on reticulocyte levels in cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Maher Khalife, Michele Salvagno, Maurice Sosnowski, Costantino Balestra","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00179-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anemia is common among hospitalized critically ill and surgical oncological patients. The rising incidence of cancer and aggressive treatments has increased the demand for blood products, further strained by a dwindling donor pool. The normobaric oxygen paradox (NOP) has emerged as a potential avenue to increase EPO levels. While some studies support its efficacy, research remains limited in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a NOP protocol in stimulating erythropoiesis, as measured by changes in reticulocyte counts, in cancer patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective, single-center, controlled, randomized study. A total of 49 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were analyzed at the Institut Jules Bordet. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 24 h were enrolled, excluding those with severe renal insufficiency or who received transfusions during the study period. Participants were randomized into two groups: a normobaric oxygen paradox (OXY) group who received 60% oxygen for 2 h on days 1, 3, and 5 post-surgery and a control (CTR) group who received standard care. Data on baseline characteristics, surgical details, and laboratory parameters were collected. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and linear and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 33 patients (median age 62 [IQR 58-66], 28 (84.8%) males, with no withdrawals or deaths during the study period. No significant differences were observed in baseline surgical characteristics or perioperative outcomes between the two groups. In the OXY group (n = 16), there was a significant rise (p = 0.0237) in the percentage of reticulocyte levels in comparison to the CTR group (n = 17), with median values of 36.1% (IQR 20.3-57.8) versus - 5.3% (IQR - 19.2-57.8), respectively. The increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels did not significantly differ between the groups when compared to their baselines' values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the potential of normobaric oxygen therapy in stimulating erythropoiesis in cancer patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. While the OXY group resulted in increased reticulocyte counts, further research with larger sample sizes and multi-center trials is warranted to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered under NCT number 06321874 on The 10th of April 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00179-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anemia is common among hospitalized critically ill and surgical oncological patients. The rising incidence of cancer and aggressive treatments has increased the demand for blood products, further strained by a dwindling donor pool. The normobaric oxygen paradox (NOP) has emerged as a potential avenue to increase EPO levels. While some studies support its efficacy, research remains limited in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a NOP protocol in stimulating erythropoiesis, as measured by changes in reticulocyte counts, in cancer patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.

Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective, single-center, controlled, randomized study. A total of 49 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were analyzed at the Institut Jules Bordet. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 24 h were enrolled, excluding those with severe renal insufficiency or who received transfusions during the study period. Participants were randomized into two groups: a normobaric oxygen paradox (OXY) group who received 60% oxygen for 2 h on days 1, 3, and 5 post-surgery and a control (CTR) group who received standard care. Data on baseline characteristics, surgical details, and laboratory parameters were collected. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and linear and logistic regression.

Results: The final analysis included 33 patients (median age 62 [IQR 58-66], 28 (84.8%) males, with no withdrawals or deaths during the study period. No significant differences were observed in baseline surgical characteristics or perioperative outcomes between the two groups. In the OXY group (n = 16), there was a significant rise (p = 0.0237) in the percentage of reticulocyte levels in comparison to the CTR group (n = 17), with median values of 36.1% (IQR 20.3-57.8) versus - 5.3% (IQR - 19.2-57.8), respectively. The increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels did not significantly differ between the groups when compared to their baselines' values.

Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the potential of normobaric oxygen therapy in stimulating erythropoiesis in cancer patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. While the OXY group resulted in increased reticulocyte counts, further research with larger sample sizes and multi-center trials is warranted to confirm these findings.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered under NCT number 06321874 on The 10th of April 2024.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索手术后高氧间歇刺激对癌症患者网织红细胞水平的影响:随机对照研究。
背景:贫血是住院重症病人和肿瘤外科病人的常见病。癌症发病率的上升和积极的治疗增加了对血液制品的需求,而献血者人数的减少又进一步加剧了这一需求。常压氧悖论(NOP)已成为提高 EPO 水平的潜在途径。虽然一些研究支持其有效性,但在临床环境中的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在评估常压氧悖论方案在刺激接受腹部手术的癌症患者的红细胞生成方面的效果,该效果通过网织红细胞计数的变化来衡量:这是对一项前瞻性、单中心、对照、随机研究的事后分析。朱尔斯-博尔代研究所共对 49 名接受腹部手术的患者进行了分析。研究对象为入住重症监护室(ICU)至少24小时的成年患者,不包括严重肾功能不全或在研究期间接受过输血的患者。参与者被随机分为两组:常压氧悖论(OXY)组和对照组(CTR),前者在术后第1、3和5天接受60%氧气吸入2小时,后者接受标准护理。研究人员收集了基线特征、手术细节和实验室参数等数据。统计分析包括描述性统计、卡方检验、t 检验、曼-惠特尼检验、线性回归和逻辑回归:最终分析包括 33 名患者(中位年龄 62 [IQR:58-66],28(84.8%)名男性),研究期间无患者退出或死亡。两组患者的基线手术特征和围手术期结果无明显差异。在 OXY 组(n = 16),与 CTR 组(n = 17)相比,网织红细胞水平的百分比显著上升(p = 0.0237),中位值分别为 36.1%(IQR 20.3-57.8)和 - 5.3%(IQR - 19.2-57.8)。与基线值相比,各组间血红蛋白和血细胞比容水平的增加没有显著差异:这项研究提供了初步证据,支持常压氧疗在刺激接受腹部手术的癌症患者红细胞生成方面的潜力。尽管常压氧疗组可增加网织红细胞计数,但仍需进行更大规模的样本研究和多中心试验来证实这些发现:该研究于 2024 年 4 月 10 日进行了回顾性注册,NCT 编号为 06321874。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe bronchiolitis before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective database analysis by the Italian Network of PICU study group (TIPNet). Understanding neuropathic pain: the role of neurophysiological tests in unveiling underlying mechanisms. Erector spinae plane block for cancer pain relief: a systematic review. Echocardiographic evaluation in patient candidate for liver transplant: from pathophysiology to hemodynamic optimization. Management of critically ill patients in austere environments: good clinical practice by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1