Medication Reconciliation Errors on Discharge for Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Patients.

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2024-06-30 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.24003
Ayman Alboudi, Anna M Bank
{"title":"Medication Reconciliation Errors on Discharge for Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Patients.","authors":"Ayman Alboudi, Anna M Bank","doi":"10.14581/jer.24003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Medication errors are common in the inpatient setting. Epilepsy patients who miss doses of their antiseizure medications are at risk for breakthrough seizures and subsequent complications. The purpose of this study was to quantify and characterize anti-seizure medications reconciliation errors on discharge from the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive admissions to an academic medical center EMU were retrospectively reviewed. Medication reconciliation errors on discharge, including drug errors, dosing errors, and dose timing errors, were recorded. Associations between medication errors and clinical and demographic variables were analyzed using binary logistic regression for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eleven admissions between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021 were identified. Fourteen anti-seizure medication reconciliation errors were recorded during 11 unique admissions (9.9% of admissions). The most common error type was dosing error (10/14 errors; 71.4%). Number of antiseizure medications on admission (<i>p</i>=0.004), total number of medications on admission (<i>p</i>=0.013), number of medication changes during admission (<i>p</i>=0.0007), and length of stay (<i>p</i>=0.0001) were associated with increased likelihood of errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication reconciliation errors upon discharge from the EMU occur during approximately 10% of admissions. A higher number of preadmission antiseizure medications, higher total number of preadmission medications, higher number of medication changes during admission, and longer length of stay are associated with increased risk of discharge medication reconciliation errors. Careful attention should be paid to patients with these risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.24003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Medication errors are common in the inpatient setting. Epilepsy patients who miss doses of their antiseizure medications are at risk for breakthrough seizures and subsequent complications. The purpose of this study was to quantify and characterize anti-seizure medications reconciliation errors on discharge from the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU).

Methods: Consecutive admissions to an academic medical center EMU were retrospectively reviewed. Medication reconciliation errors on discharge, including drug errors, dosing errors, and dose timing errors, were recorded. Associations between medication errors and clinical and demographic variables were analyzed using binary logistic regression for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.

Results: One hundred and eleven admissions between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021 were identified. Fourteen anti-seizure medication reconciliation errors were recorded during 11 unique admissions (9.9% of admissions). The most common error type was dosing error (10/14 errors; 71.4%). Number of antiseizure medications on admission (p=0.004), total number of medications on admission (p=0.013), number of medication changes during admission (p=0.0007), and length of stay (p=0.0001) were associated with increased likelihood of errors.

Conclusions: Medication reconciliation errors upon discharge from the EMU occur during approximately 10% of admissions. A higher number of preadmission antiseizure medications, higher total number of preadmission medications, higher number of medication changes during admission, and longer length of stay are associated with increased risk of discharge medication reconciliation errors. Careful attention should be paid to patients with these risk factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫监护室患者出院时的药物核对错误。
背景和目的:用药错误在住院环境中很常见。错过抗癫痫药物剂量的癫痫患者面临着突破性癫痫发作和后续并发症的风险。本研究旨在量化和描述癫痫监护病房(EMU)出院时抗癫痫药物调节错误:方法:对一家学术医疗中心癫痫监护病房的连续入院患者进行回顾性研究。记录了出院时的药物调节错误,包括药物错误、剂量错误和剂量时间错误。对连续变量采用二元逻辑回归分析用药错误与临床和人口统计学变量之间的关系,对分类变量采用费雪精确检验分析用药错误与临床和人口统计学变量之间的关系:结果:发现了 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间的 111 例入院患者。在 11 例入院病例(占入院病例的 9.9%)中记录了 14 次抗癫痫药物调节错误。最常见的错误类型是剂量错误(10/14 次错误;71.4%)。入院时的抗癫痫药物数量(p=0.004)、入院时的药物总数(p=0.013)、入院期间的换药次数(p=0.0007)和住院时间(p=0.0001)与发生错误的可能性增加有关:结论:约10%的入院患者在从急诊监护室出院时会出现药物调节错误。入院前服用的抗癫痫药物数量越多、入院前服用的药物总数越多、入院期间换药次数越多以及住院时间越长,出院药物调节错误的风险就越高。对存在这些风险因素的患者应给予密切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additive Anticonvulsive Effects of Sumatriptan and Morphine on Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Clonic Seizures in Mice. Cerebral Folate Transport Deficiency in 2 Cases with Intractable Myoclonic Epilepsy. Gyratory Seizures in Hypothalamic Hamartoma. Laughter-Induced Seizures: A Rare Type of Reflex Epilepsy. Medication Reconciliation Errors on Discharge for Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1