Impact of Perampanel for First-Episode Seizures versus Usual Care on Clinical Outcome and Safety Profile Aspects of the Thai Experience.

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.24014
Panu Boontoterm, Siraruj Sakoolnamarka, Karanarak Urasyanandana, Pusit Fuengfoo
{"title":"Impact of Perampanel for First-Episode Seizures versus Usual Care on Clinical Outcome and Safety Profile Aspects of the Thai Experience.","authors":"Panu Boontoterm, Siraruj Sakoolnamarka, Karanarak Urasyanandana, Pusit Fuengfoo","doi":"10.14581/jer.24014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Epilepsy increases poor outcomes in patients with post-traumatic brain injury and brain tumor-related epilepsy, for whom early seizure control is essential. Perampanel (PER) was a known third-generation antiepileptic drug for treatment all types of seizures. The objective of the study is to compare clinical outcomes and safety of PER administration as monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study of all 84 patients assigned to PER monotherapy (PER group, n=36) and other first-line antiepileptic drugs (n=48). Clinical outcomes parameters were measured by the prevalence of patients with a diminish in seizure frequency at 50% in 28 days. From November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2024, comparing the PER group with usual care. Clinical outcomes included adherence rate and seizure-free proportion at 28 days and 6 months. Adverse drug reactions were recorded in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in demographic data and incidence of adverse drug reactions between two groups. Median PER dosage was 4 mg (range, 2-12 mg). Compared to other antiepileptic drugs, the PER group had a prevalence of 50% responder rate at 28 days and 6 months significantly were 75%, 81%, 65%, and 51% respectively. Common adverse drug reactions were somnolence and dizziness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PER administration as monotherapy demonstrated good efficacy and less adverse drug reactions. Low dosages helped to decrease adverse drug reactions and improved retention rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":"14 2","pages":"81-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.24014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Epilepsy increases poor outcomes in patients with post-traumatic brain injury and brain tumor-related epilepsy, for whom early seizure control is essential. Perampanel (PER) was a known third-generation antiepileptic drug for treatment all types of seizures. The objective of the study is to compare clinical outcomes and safety of PER administration as monotherapy.

Methods: A prospective study of all 84 patients assigned to PER monotherapy (PER group, n=36) and other first-line antiepileptic drugs (n=48). Clinical outcomes parameters were measured by the prevalence of patients with a diminish in seizure frequency at 50% in 28 days. From November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2024, comparing the PER group with usual care. Clinical outcomes included adherence rate and seizure-free proportion at 28 days and 6 months. Adverse drug reactions were recorded in both groups.

Results: There was no difference in demographic data and incidence of adverse drug reactions between two groups. Median PER dosage was 4 mg (range, 2-12 mg). Compared to other antiepileptic drugs, the PER group had a prevalence of 50% responder rate at 28 days and 6 months significantly were 75%, 81%, 65%, and 51% respectively. Common adverse drug reactions were somnolence and dizziness.

Conclusions: PER administration as monotherapy demonstrated good efficacy and less adverse drug reactions. Low dosages helped to decrease adverse drug reactions and improved retention rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perampanel对首发癫痫发作与常规治疗的临床结果和泰国经验的安全性的影响。
背景和目的:癫痫增加了创伤后脑损伤和脑肿瘤相关癫痫患者的不良预后,对这些患者来说,早期癫痫发作控制至关重要。Perampanel (PER)是已知的第三代抗癫痫药物,可治疗所有类型的癫痫发作。该研究的目的是比较PER作为单药治疗的临床结果和安全性。方法:84例患者采用PER单药治疗(PER组,n=36)和其他一线抗癫痫药物治疗(n=48)进行前瞻性研究。临床结果参数通过28天内癫痫发作频率减少50%的患者患病率来测量。从2020年11月1日至2024年4月30日,PER组与常规护理组的比较。临床结果包括依从率和28天和6个月无癫痫发作比例。两组均记录药物不良反应。结果:两组患者人口学资料及药物不良反应发生率无差异。PER中位剂量为4mg(范围2- 12mg)。与其他抗癫痫药物相比,PER组28天和6个月的患病率为50%,分别为75%、81%、65%和51%。常见的药物不良反应为嗜睡和头晕。结论:单药给药效果好,药物不良反应少。低剂量有助于减少药物不良反应,提高保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions to Antiseizure Medications. Effect of Anti-Seizure Medication Monotherapy on Vitamin D Levels in Indian Children: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Impact of Perampanel for First-Episode Seizures versus Usual Care on Clinical Outcome and Safety Profile Aspects of the Thai Experience. Lateralizing Value of Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation Software in MRI-Negative Focal Epilepsy. New Onset Absence Status Epilepticus in Pregnancy: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1