Use of chronic care management service among Medicare beneficiaries in 2015–2019

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19066
Jieun Jang PhD, Ellen P. McCarthy PhD, MPH, Brianne Olivieri-Mui PhD, MPH, Sandra M. Shi MD, MPH, Chan Mi Park MD, MPH, Gahee Oh MD, MPH, Stephanie Denise M. Sison MD, MBA, Dae Hyun Kim MD, MPH, ScD
{"title":"Use of chronic care management service among Medicare beneficiaries in 2015–2019","authors":"Jieun Jang PhD,&nbsp;Ellen P. McCarthy PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Brianne Olivieri-Mui PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Sandra M. Shi MD, MPH,&nbsp;Chan Mi Park MD, MPH,&nbsp;Gahee Oh MD, MPH,&nbsp;Stephanie Denise M. Sison MD, MBA,&nbsp;Dae Hyun Kim MD, MPH, ScD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced chronic care management (CCM) services in 2015 for patients with multiple chronic diseases. Few studies examine the utilization of CCM services by geographic region, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used 2014–2019 Medicare claims data from a 5% random sample of fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or over. We included beneficiaries potentially eligible for CCM services because they had multiple chronic conditions (1,073,729 in 2015 and 1,130,523 in 2019). We calculated the proportion of potentially eligible beneficiaries receiving CCM service each year for the total population and by geographic region, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The proportion of beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions receiving CCM services increased from 1.1% in 2015 to 3.4% in 2019. The increase in CCM use was higher in the southern region, among dually eligible beneficiaries and beneficiaries with a greater burden of chronic conditions (2–5 conditions vs ≥10 conditions: 0.7% vs 2.0% in 2015; 2.1% vs 7.0% in 2019) and frailty (robust vs severely frail: 0.6% vs 3.3% in 2015; 1.9% vs 9.4% in 2019). Nearly one out of five recipients did not continue CCM service after the initial service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found that CCM service is being used by a very small fraction of eligible patients. Barriers and facilitators to more effective CCM adoption should be identified and incorporated into strategies that encourage more widespread use of this Medicare benefit.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 9","pages":"2730-2737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced chronic care management (CCM) services in 2015 for patients with multiple chronic diseases. Few studies examine the utilization of CCM services by geographic region, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics.

Methods

We used 2014–2019 Medicare claims data from a 5% random sample of fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or over. We included beneficiaries potentially eligible for CCM services because they had multiple chronic conditions (1,073,729 in 2015 and 1,130,523 in 2019). We calculated the proportion of potentially eligible beneficiaries receiving CCM service each year for the total population and by geographic region, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics.

Results

The proportion of beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions receiving CCM services increased from 1.1% in 2015 to 3.4% in 2019. The increase in CCM use was higher in the southern region, among dually eligible beneficiaries and beneficiaries with a greater burden of chronic conditions (2–5 conditions vs ≥10 conditions: 0.7% vs 2.0% in 2015; 2.1% vs 7.0% in 2019) and frailty (robust vs severely frail: 0.6% vs 3.3% in 2015; 1.9% vs 9.4% in 2019). Nearly one out of five recipients did not continue CCM service after the initial service.

Conclusion

We found that CCM service is being used by a very small fraction of eligible patients. Barriers and facilitators to more effective CCM adoption should be identified and incorporated into strategies that encourage more widespread use of this Medicare benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015-2019 年医疗保险受益人使用慢性病护理管理服务的情况。
背景:美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)于 2015 年推出了针对多种慢性病患者的慢性病护理管理(CCM)服务。很少有研究按照地理区域、社会人口学和临床特征对 CCM 服务的使用情况进行研究:我们使用了 2014-2019 年医疗保险理赔数据,这些数据来自 65 岁或以上付费服务受益人的 5% 随机抽样。我们纳入了因患有多种慢性疾病而可能符合 CCM 服务条件的受益人(2015 年为 1,073,729 人,2019 年为 1,130,523 人)。我们计算了每年接受 CCM 服务的潜在合格受益人在总人口中所占的比例,并按地理区域、社会人口和临床特征进行了分类:有两种或两种以上慢性病的受益人接受 CCM 服务的比例从 2015 年的 1.1% 增加到 2019 年的 3.4%。在南部地区、双重资格受益人和慢性病负担较重的受益人中,使用 CCM 的比例增幅较大(2-5 种病症 vs ≥10 种病症:0.7% vs 2.0%;2-5 种病症 vs ≥10 种病症:0.7% vs 2.0%):2015年为0.7% vs 2.0%;2019年为2.1% vs 7.0%)和体弱(体格健壮 vs 严重体弱:2015年为0.6% vs 3.3%;2019年为1.9% vs 9.4%)的受益人。近五分之一的接受者在首次服务后没有继续接受 CCM 服务:我们发现,只有极少数符合条件的患者使用了 CCM 服务。应找出更有效地采用 CCM 的障碍和促进因素,并将其纳入鼓励更广泛使用这一医疗保险福利的战略中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Notices Issue Information Cover Issue Information Author Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1