{"title":"Evaluation of an Undergraduate Oral Surgery Curriculum - A Pilot Study.","authors":"Olufemi Kolawole Ogundipe, Lianne Keiller, Olawumi Adedoyin Fatusi","doi":"10.60787/nmj-64-6-374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following curricular revisions at the Faculty of Dentistry of the Obafemi Awolowo University, no formal evaluation of its alignment and implementation has been carried out.This study aimed to evaluate the alignment of an Oral surgery curriculum and to determine students' learning experiences and perceptions of the curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a mixed-method study conducted at Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. This ethically approved study adopted a mixed-method descriptive approach to data collection and analysis. Data collection followed a sequential, phased approach comprising document analysis, curriculum mapping, questionnaire survey, and focus group discussions.Quantitative data collected via questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data from focus group discussions were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis by the researchers to generate relevant themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The curriculum data reveal that the oral surgery course is well-aligned. Furthermore, each course outcome utilizes different methods of assessments and teaching/learning activities (TLAs). Focus group discussions yielded four themes and two sub-themes. The main themes included curriculum alignment, implemented teaching and learning activities, feedback, and curriculum renewal, while the subthemes were recommended TLAs and student learning experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The curriculum evaluation identified strengths of the course as multiple student assessment methods and potential areas for improvement. These improvements included updating the content of the course and including more variety in teaching and learning methods. The authors identified potential learning gaps that require curriculum renewal. Evaluation of the entire program is recommended for comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":"64 6","pages":"825-837"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60787/nmj-64-6-374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Following curricular revisions at the Faculty of Dentistry of the Obafemi Awolowo University, no formal evaluation of its alignment and implementation has been carried out.This study aimed to evaluate the alignment of an Oral surgery curriculum and to determine students' learning experiences and perceptions of the curriculum.
Methodology: This was a mixed-method study conducted at Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. This ethically approved study adopted a mixed-method descriptive approach to data collection and analysis. Data collection followed a sequential, phased approach comprising document analysis, curriculum mapping, questionnaire survey, and focus group discussions.Quantitative data collected via questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data from focus group discussions were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis by the researchers to generate relevant themes.
Results: The curriculum data reveal that the oral surgery course is well-aligned. Furthermore, each course outcome utilizes different methods of assessments and teaching/learning activities (TLAs). Focus group discussions yielded four themes and two sub-themes. The main themes included curriculum alignment, implemented teaching and learning activities, feedback, and curriculum renewal, while the subthemes were recommended TLAs and student learning experiences.
Conclusions: The curriculum evaluation identified strengths of the course as multiple student assessment methods and potential areas for improvement. These improvements included updating the content of the course and including more variety in teaching and learning methods. The authors identified potential learning gaps that require curriculum renewal. Evaluation of the entire program is recommended for comparison.