Water Treatment Practices and Misperceived Social Norms among Women Living with Young Children in Rural Uganda.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Pub Date : 2024-07-09 Print Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.23-0723
Jessica M Perkins, Bernard Kakuhikire, Charles Baguma, Meredith Meadows, Raphael Abayateye, Justin D Rasmussen, Emily N Satinsky, Patrick Gumisiriza, Justus Kananura, Elizabeth B Namara, David R Bangsberg, Alexander C Tsai
{"title":"Water Treatment Practices and Misperceived Social Norms among Women Living with Young Children in Rural Uganda.","authors":"Jessica M Perkins, Bernard Kakuhikire, Charles Baguma, Meredith Meadows, Raphael Abayateye, Justin D Rasmussen, Emily N Satinsky, Patrick Gumisiriza, Justus Kananura, Elizabeth B Namara, David R Bangsberg, Alexander C Tsai","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.23-0723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to water safe for consumption is critical for health and well-being, yet substantial structural barriers often necessitate household action to make water safer. Social norms about water treatment practices are understudied as a driver of personal water treatment practice. This study assesses reported and perceived water treatment practices among women in a rural, water insecure setting. We used cross-sectional data from a population-based study of women living with children under 5 years old across eight villages in southwest Uganda. Participants reported their typical household water treatment practices and what they perceived to be the common practices among most other women with young children in their own village. Modified multivariable Poisson regression models estimated the association between individual behavior and perceptions. Of 274 participants (78% response rate), 221 (81%) reported boiling water and 228 (83%) reported taking at least one action to make water safer. However, 135 (49%) misperceived most women with young children in their village not to boil their water, and 119 (43%) misperceived most to take no action. Participants who misperceived these norms were less likely to practice safe water treatment (e.g., for boiling water, adjusted relative risk = 0.80; 95% CI 0.69-0.92, P = 0.002), adjusting for other factors. Future research should assess whether making actual descriptive norms about local water treatment practices visible and salient (e.g., with messages such as \"most women in this village boil their drinking water\") corrects misperceived norms and increases safe water treatment practices by some and supports consistent safe practices by others.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to water safe for consumption is critical for health and well-being, yet substantial structural barriers often necessitate household action to make water safer. Social norms about water treatment practices are understudied as a driver of personal water treatment practice. This study assesses reported and perceived water treatment practices among women in a rural, water insecure setting. We used cross-sectional data from a population-based study of women living with children under 5 years old across eight villages in southwest Uganda. Participants reported their typical household water treatment practices and what they perceived to be the common practices among most other women with young children in their own village. Modified multivariable Poisson regression models estimated the association between individual behavior and perceptions. Of 274 participants (78% response rate), 221 (81%) reported boiling water and 228 (83%) reported taking at least one action to make water safer. However, 135 (49%) misperceived most women with young children in their village not to boil their water, and 119 (43%) misperceived most to take no action. Participants who misperceived these norms were less likely to practice safe water treatment (e.g., for boiling water, adjusted relative risk = 0.80; 95% CI 0.69-0.92, P = 0.002), adjusting for other factors. Future research should assess whether making actual descriptive norms about local water treatment practices visible and salient (e.g., with messages such as "most women in this village boil their drinking water") corrects misperceived norms and increases safe water treatment practices by some and supports consistent safe practices by others.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达农村地区有年幼子女的妇女的水处理方法和误解的社会规范。
获得可安全饮用的水对健康和福祉至关重要,然而,由于存在巨大的结构性障碍,家庭往往不得不采取行动使水更安全。关于水处理方法的社会规范是个人水处理方法的驱动因素,但对其研究不足。本研究评估了农村用水不安全环境中妇女所报告和感知的水处理方法。我们使用的横截面数据来自一项基于人口的研究,研究对象是乌干达西南部八个村庄中有 5 岁以下儿童的妇女。参与者报告了她们典型的家庭水处理方法,以及她们认为本村其他大多数有幼儿的妇女的普遍做法。修正的多变量泊松回归模型估算了个人行为与认知之间的关联。在 274 名参与者(回复率为 78%)中,221 人(81%)报告说烧开水,228 人(83%)报告说至少采取了一种使水更安全的措施。然而,135 人(49%)误认为村里大多数有幼儿的妇女不会烧水,119 人(43%)误认为大多数人不会采取任何行动。在对其他因素进行调整后,误解这些规范的参与者不太可能采取安全的水处理方法(例如,对于烧开水,调整后的相对风险 = 0.80; 95% CI 0.69-0.92, P = 0.002)。未来的研究应该评估,使有关当地水处理方法的实际描述性规范变得明显和突出(例如,传递 "本村大多数妇女都会煮沸饮用水 "等信息),是否会纠正错误认知的规范,增加一些人的安全水处理方法,并支持另一些人的持续安全方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
期刊最新文献
Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Rural Tanzania During the First 6 Months of the Global COVID-19 Pandemic. Identification of Post-Tuberculosis Lung Function Impairment Early during the Course of Treatment. A Qualitative Method To Assess a History of Cerebral Malaria in Malian Children. A Retrospective Analysis of Lessons Learned and Perspectives on Expansion of Verbal Autopsy Implementation in Zambia, 2023. Core Content, Competencies, and Accreditation in US Global Health Fellowships: A Survey of Leaders' Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1