Topical Cannabidiol Application May Not Attenuate Muscle Soreness or Improve Performance: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1089/can.2024.0012
Joseph T Pastina, Mark G Abel, Lance M Bollinger, Stuart A Best
{"title":"Topical Cannabidiol Application May Not Attenuate Muscle Soreness or Improve Performance: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Joseph T Pastina, Mark G Abel, Lance M Bollinger, Stuart A Best","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate cannabidiol (CBD) cream's effects on muscle soreness and performance after exercise. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This double-blinded, placebo-controlled experiment included 15 men and 13 women (<i>n</i> = 28; mean ± standard deviation age: 23.29 ± 2.54 years) untrained in lower-body resistance training. Participants were randomized into control (NG, <i>n</i> = 9), CBD (CG, <i>n</i> = 9), or placebo (PG, <i>n</i> = 10) groups. Participants completed a lower-body fatigue protocol (FP) consisting of unilateral maximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions of the quadriceps and hamstrings (5 sets, 10 repetitions, both legs). CG and PG participants applied ∼100 mg CBD or placebo cream, respectively, matched for weight and appearance to the quadriceps on three separate days. NG participants engaged in a sitting rest period matched in duration to cream application processes. Questionnaires, pressure-pain threshold (PPT), peak torque test (PTT), and countermovement jump (CMJ) were assessed. Mixed-model analysis of variance was conducted to assess main effects and interactions (group × muscle × time; group × time). <b>Results:</b> There were no significant interactions or main effects for group for PPT, CMJ, or PTT. There were main effects for time (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for all soreness questions, PPT, CMJ, and PTT. There was one significant interaction (group × time; <i>p</i> = 0.045) for cream/rest effect questions, in which PG participants perceived the effect of cream to be greater than the effect of rest for NG participants. There were main effects for group (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.031) for all soreness questions, in which PG participants perceived enhanced recovery. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present pilot study did not discover any significant impacts of CBD cream use for muscle recovery. For individuals seeking to attenuate muscle soreness and improve performance, the current dose of this topical CBD product may not be an effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate cannabidiol (CBD) cream's effects on muscle soreness and performance after exercise. Materials and Methods: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled experiment included 15 men and 13 women (n = 28; mean ± standard deviation age: 23.29 ± 2.54 years) untrained in lower-body resistance training. Participants were randomized into control (NG, n = 9), CBD (CG, n = 9), or placebo (PG, n = 10) groups. Participants completed a lower-body fatigue protocol (FP) consisting of unilateral maximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions of the quadriceps and hamstrings (5 sets, 10 repetitions, both legs). CG and PG participants applied ∼100 mg CBD or placebo cream, respectively, matched for weight and appearance to the quadriceps on three separate days. NG participants engaged in a sitting rest period matched in duration to cream application processes. Questionnaires, pressure-pain threshold (PPT), peak torque test (PTT), and countermovement jump (CMJ) were assessed. Mixed-model analysis of variance was conducted to assess main effects and interactions (group × muscle × time; group × time). Results: There were no significant interactions or main effects for group for PPT, CMJ, or PTT. There were main effects for time (p < 0.05) for all soreness questions, PPT, CMJ, and PTT. There was one significant interaction (group × time; p = 0.045) for cream/rest effect questions, in which PG participants perceived the effect of cream to be greater than the effect of rest for NG participants. There were main effects for group (p ≤ 0.031) for all soreness questions, in which PG participants perceived enhanced recovery. Conclusions: The present pilot study did not discover any significant impacts of CBD cream use for muscle recovery. For individuals seeking to attenuate muscle soreness and improve performance, the current dose of this topical CBD product may not be an effective treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部应用大麻二酚可能不会减轻肌肉酸痛或改善运动表现:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验研究。
目的:本试验性研究旨在调查大麻二酚(CBD)乳膏对肌肉酸痛和运动后表现的影响。材料与方法:这项双盲安慰剂对照实验包括 15 名男性和 13 名女性(n = 28;平均年龄(标准差):23.29 ± 2.54 岁),他们均未接受过下半身阻力训练。参与者被随机分为对照组(NG,n = 9)、CBD 组(CG,n = 9)或安慰剂组(PG,n = 10)。参与者完成下半身疲劳方案(FP),包括股四头肌和腘绳肌的单侧最大同心和偏心等动肌肉动作(5 组,10 次重复,双腿)。CG 和 PG 参与者分别在三日内在股四头肌涂抹 100 毫克 CBD 或安慰剂药膏,药膏的重量和外观与 CBD 或安慰剂相匹配。NG 参与者坐着休息的时间与涂抹药膏的时间相匹配。对问卷、压痛阈值(PPT)、峰值扭矩测试(PTT)和反向运动跳跃(CMJ)进行了评估。采用混合模型方差分析来评估主效应和交互作用(组别 × 肌肉 × 时间;组别 × 时间)。结果:对于 PPT、CMJ 或 PTT,各组之间没有明显的交互作用或主效应。所有酸痛问题、PPT、CMJ 和 PTT 都存在时间主效应(p < 0.05)。在膏药/休息效果问题上,有一个显着的交互作用(组别 × 时间;p = 0.045),即 PG 参与者认为膏药的效果大于 NG 参与者休息的效果。在所有酸痛问题上都存在组别的主效应(p ≤ 0.031),其中 PG 参与者认为恢复能力更强。结论:本试点研究并未发现使用 CBD 霜对肌肉恢复有任何显著影响。对于希望减轻肌肉酸痛和提高运动成绩的人来说,目前剂量的这种局部 CBD 产品可能不是一种有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
期刊最新文献
Drug Interactions in People on Cannabidiol: Is There Cause for Concern? Federal Courts Will No Longer Need to Follow the DEA's Interpretation of Cannabis-Related Law. Minor Cannabinoid Profile of Unregulated Cannabidiol Products. Technology-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Decreasing Cannabis Use in People with Psychosis: A Systematic Review Update. Biological Response after 14-Day Cannabidiol and Propylene Glycol Inhalation in Sprague-Dawley Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1