Topical Cannabidiol Application May Not Attenuate Muscle Soreness or Improve Performance: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.
Joseph T Pastina, Mark G Abel, Lance M Bollinger, Stuart A Best
{"title":"Topical Cannabidiol Application May Not Attenuate Muscle Soreness or Improve Performance: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Joseph T Pastina, Mark G Abel, Lance M Bollinger, Stuart A Best","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate cannabidiol (CBD) cream's effects on muscle soreness and performance after exercise. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This double-blinded, placebo-controlled experiment included 15 men and 13 women (<i>n</i> = 28; mean ± standard deviation age: 23.29 ± 2.54 years) untrained in lower-body resistance training. Participants were randomized into control (NG, <i>n</i> = 9), CBD (CG, <i>n</i> = 9), or placebo (PG, <i>n</i> = 10) groups. Participants completed a lower-body fatigue protocol (FP) consisting of unilateral maximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions of the quadriceps and hamstrings (5 sets, 10 repetitions, both legs). CG and PG participants applied ∼100 mg CBD or placebo cream, respectively, matched for weight and appearance to the quadriceps on three separate days. NG participants engaged in a sitting rest period matched in duration to cream application processes. Questionnaires, pressure-pain threshold (PPT), peak torque test (PTT), and countermovement jump (CMJ) were assessed. Mixed-model analysis of variance was conducted to assess main effects and interactions (group × muscle × time; group × time). <b>Results:</b> There were no significant interactions or main effects for group for PPT, CMJ, or PTT. There were main effects for time (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for all soreness questions, PPT, CMJ, and PTT. There was one significant interaction (group × time; <i>p</i> = 0.045) for cream/rest effect questions, in which PG participants perceived the effect of cream to be greater than the effect of rest for NG participants. There were main effects for group (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.031) for all soreness questions, in which PG participants perceived enhanced recovery. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present pilot study did not discover any significant impacts of CBD cream use for muscle recovery. For individuals seeking to attenuate muscle soreness and improve performance, the current dose of this topical CBD product may not be an effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate cannabidiol (CBD) cream's effects on muscle soreness and performance after exercise. Materials and Methods: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled experiment included 15 men and 13 women (n = 28; mean ± standard deviation age: 23.29 ± 2.54 years) untrained in lower-body resistance training. Participants were randomized into control (NG, n = 9), CBD (CG, n = 9), or placebo (PG, n = 10) groups. Participants completed a lower-body fatigue protocol (FP) consisting of unilateral maximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions of the quadriceps and hamstrings (5 sets, 10 repetitions, both legs). CG and PG participants applied ∼100 mg CBD or placebo cream, respectively, matched for weight and appearance to the quadriceps on three separate days. NG participants engaged in a sitting rest period matched in duration to cream application processes. Questionnaires, pressure-pain threshold (PPT), peak torque test (PTT), and countermovement jump (CMJ) were assessed. Mixed-model analysis of variance was conducted to assess main effects and interactions (group × muscle × time; group × time). Results: There were no significant interactions or main effects for group for PPT, CMJ, or PTT. There were main effects for time (p < 0.05) for all soreness questions, PPT, CMJ, and PTT. There was one significant interaction (group × time; p = 0.045) for cream/rest effect questions, in which PG participants perceived the effect of cream to be greater than the effect of rest for NG participants. There were main effects for group (p ≤ 0.031) for all soreness questions, in which PG participants perceived enhanced recovery. Conclusions: The present pilot study did not discover any significant impacts of CBD cream use for muscle recovery. For individuals seeking to attenuate muscle soreness and improve performance, the current dose of this topical CBD product may not be an effective treatment.