Evaluation of fragility fracture risk using deep learning based on ultrasound radio frequency signal.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Endocrine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-03931-z
Wenqiang Luo, Jionglin Wu, Zhiwei Chen, Peidong Guo, Qi Zhang, Baiying Lei, Zhong Chen, Shixun Li, Changchuan Li, Haoxian Liu, Teng Ma, Jiang Liu, Xiaoyi Chen, Yue Ding
{"title":"Evaluation of fragility fracture risk using deep learning based on ultrasound radio frequency signal.","authors":"Wenqiang Luo, Jionglin Wu, Zhiwei Chen, Peidong Guo, Qi Zhang, Baiying Lei, Zhong Chen, Shixun Li, Changchuan Li, Haoxian Liu, Teng Ma, Jiang Liu, Xiaoyi Chen, Yue Ding","doi":"10.1007/s12020-024-03931-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It was essential to identify individuals at high risk of fragility fracture and prevented them due to the significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden associated with fragility fracture. The quantitative ultrasound (QUS) showed promise in assessing bone structure characteristics and determining the risk of fragility fracture.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the performance of a multi-channel residual network (MResNet) based on ultrasonic radiofrequency (RF) signal to discriminate fragility fractures retrospectively in postmenopausal women, and compared it with the traditional parameter of QUS, speed of sound (SOS), and bone mineral density (BMD) acquired with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using QUS, RF signal and SOS were acquired for 246 postmenopausal women. An MResNet was utilized, based on the RF signal, to categorize individuals with an elevated risk of fragility fracture. DXA was employed to obtain BMD at the lumbar, hip, and femoral neck. The fracture history of all adult subjects was gathered. Analyzing the odds ratios (OR) and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) was done to evaluate the effectiveness of various methods in discriminating fragility fracture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 246 postmenopausal women, 170 belonged to the non-fracture group, 50 to the vertebral group, and 26 to the non-vertebral fracture group. MResNet was competent to discriminate any fragility fracture (OR = 2.64; AUC = 0.74), Vertebral fracture (OR = 3.02; AUC = 0.77), and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 2.01; AUC = 0.69). After being modified by clinical covariates, the efficiency of MResNet was further improved to OR = 3.31-4.08, AUC = 0.81-0.83 among all fracture groups, which significantly surpassed QUS-SOS (OR = 1.32-1.36; AUC = 0.60) and DXA-BMD (OR = 1.23-2.94; AUC = 0.63-0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot cross-sectional study demonstrates that the MResNet model based on the ultrasonic RF signal shows promising performance in discriminating fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. When incorporating clinical covariates, the efficiency of the modified MResNet is further enhanced, surpassing the performance of QUS-SOS and DXA-BMD in terms of OR and AUC. These findings highlight the potential of the MResNet as a promising approach for fracture risk assessment. Future research should focus on larger and more diverse populations to validate these results and explore its clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11572,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":"800-812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-03931-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It was essential to identify individuals at high risk of fragility fracture and prevented them due to the significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden associated with fragility fracture. The quantitative ultrasound (QUS) showed promise in assessing bone structure characteristics and determining the risk of fragility fracture.

Aims: To evaluate the performance of a multi-channel residual network (MResNet) based on ultrasonic radiofrequency (RF) signal to discriminate fragility fractures retrospectively in postmenopausal women, and compared it with the traditional parameter of QUS, speed of sound (SOS), and bone mineral density (BMD) acquired with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Methods: Using QUS, RF signal and SOS were acquired for 246 postmenopausal women. An MResNet was utilized, based on the RF signal, to categorize individuals with an elevated risk of fragility fracture. DXA was employed to obtain BMD at the lumbar, hip, and femoral neck. The fracture history of all adult subjects was gathered. Analyzing the odds ratios (OR) and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) was done to evaluate the effectiveness of various methods in discriminating fragility fracture.

Results: Among the 246 postmenopausal women, 170 belonged to the non-fracture group, 50 to the vertebral group, and 26 to the non-vertebral fracture group. MResNet was competent to discriminate any fragility fracture (OR = 2.64; AUC = 0.74), Vertebral fracture (OR = 3.02; AUC = 0.77), and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 2.01; AUC = 0.69). After being modified by clinical covariates, the efficiency of MResNet was further improved to OR = 3.31-4.08, AUC = 0.81-0.83 among all fracture groups, which significantly surpassed QUS-SOS (OR = 1.32-1.36; AUC = 0.60) and DXA-BMD (OR = 1.23-2.94; AUC = 0.63-0.76).

Conclusions: This pilot cross-sectional study demonstrates that the MResNet model based on the ultrasonic RF signal shows promising performance in discriminating fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. When incorporating clinical covariates, the efficiency of the modified MResNet is further enhanced, surpassing the performance of QUS-SOS and DXA-BMD in terms of OR and AUC. These findings highlight the potential of the MResNet as a promising approach for fracture risk assessment. Future research should focus on larger and more diverse populations to validate these results and explore its clinical applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于超声射频信号的深度学习评估脆性骨折风险。
背景:脆性骨折的发病率、死亡率和经济负担都很高,因此必须识别脆性骨折的高危人群并加以预防。目的:评估基于超声射频(RF)信号的多通道残留网络(MResNet)在绝经后妇女中回顾性判别脆性骨折的性能,并将其与 QUS 的传统参数声速(SOS)和双 X 射线吸收测量法(DXA)获得的骨矿物质密度(BMD)进行比较:方法:使用 QUS 采集了 246 名绝经后妇女的射频信号和 SOS。根据射频信号,利用 MResNet 对脆性骨折风险较高的人进行分类。采用 DXA 测量腰椎、髋部和股骨颈的 BMD。收集了所有成年受试者的骨折史。通过分析几率比(OR)和受体运算特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估各种方法在判别脆性骨折方面的有效性:在 246 名绝经后妇女中,170 人属于非骨折组,50 人属于椎体骨折组,26 人属于非椎体骨折组。MResNet 能够区分任何脆性骨折(OR = 2.64;AUC = 0.74)、椎体骨折(OR = 3.02;AUC = 0.77)和非椎体骨折(OR = 2.01;AUC = 0.69)。经临床协变量修正后,MResNet 的效率进一步提高,在所有骨折组中的 OR = 3.31-4.08,AUC = 0.81-0.83,显著超过 QUS-SOS(OR = 1.32-1.36;AUC = 0.60)和 DXA-BMD(OR = 1.23-2.94;AUC = 0.63-0.76):这项试验性横断面研究表明,基于超声射频信号的MResNet模型在判别绝经后妇女脆性骨折方面表现出良好的性能。当纳入临床协变量时,改进后的 MResNet 的效率进一步提高,在 OR 和 AUC 方面超过了 QUS-SOS 和 DXA-BMD 的表现。这些发现凸显了 MResNet 作为骨折风险评估方法的潜力。未来的研究应侧重于更大规模和更多样化的人群,以验证这些结果并探索其临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison between surgical and non-surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy: a systematic review. Women and lipoprotein apheresis: another side of gender medicine. Diabetes current and future translatable therapies. Timing of the repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: does early repeat biopsy change the rate of nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance cytology result? A comparison of brown fat tissue related hormone levels in metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1