Menglong Zhao, Huaili Jiang, Shujie Zhang, Kai Liu, Lei Zhou, Di Wu, Xixi Wen, Junpu Hu, Xuan Wang, Zhuang Liu, Yan Sha, Mengsu Zeng
{"title":"An unenhanced 3D-FLAIR sequence using long repetition time and constant flip angle to image endolymphatic hydrops.","authors":"Menglong Zhao, Huaili Jiang, Shujie Zhang, Kai Liu, Lei Zhou, Di Wu, Xixi Wen, Junpu Hu, Xuan Wang, Zhuang Liu, Yan Sha, Mengsu Zeng","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10906-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate a three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) sequence using a long repetition time (TR) and constant flip angle (CFA) in differentiating between perilymph and endolymph in a phantom study, and unenhanced endolymphatic hydrops (EH) imaging in a patient study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three solutions in similar ion and protein concentrations with endolymph, perilymph, and cerebrospinal fluid were prepared for variable flip angle (VFA) 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using different TR (10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms). Fifty-two patients with probable or definite Meniere's disease received unenhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using a long TR (20,000 ms) and 4-h-delay enhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR (TR 16,000 ms). Image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of them were compared. Agreement in the evaluation of the EH degree between them was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the phantom study, CNRs between perilymphatic and endolymphatic samples of VFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms) were 6.66 ± 1.30, 17.90 ± 2.76, 23.87 ± 3.09, and 28.22 ± 3.15 (p < 0.001). In patient study, average score (3.65 ± 0.48 vs. 4.19 ± 0.40), SNR (34.56 ± 9.80 vs. 51.40 ± 11.27), and CNR (30.66 ± 10.55 vs. 45.08 ± 12.27) of unenhanced 3D-FLAIR were lower than enhanced 3D-FLAIR (p < 0.001). Evaluations of the two sequences showed excellent agreement in the cochlear and vestibule (Kappa value: 0.898 and 0.909).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CFA 3D-FLAIR sequence using a long TR could be used in unenhanced EH imaging with high accuracy.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Unenhanced imaging of endolymphatic hydrops is valuable in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients, especially those who cannot receive contrast-enhanced MRI.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Ion and protein concentration differences can be utilized in differentiating endolymph and perilymph on MRI. Endolymphatic and perilymphatic samples could be differentiated in vitro on this 3D-FLAIR sequence. This unenhanced 3D-FLAIR sequence is in excellent agreement with the enhanced constant flip angle 3D-FLAIR sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10906-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate a three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) sequence using a long repetition time (TR) and constant flip angle (CFA) in differentiating between perilymph and endolymph in a phantom study, and unenhanced endolymphatic hydrops (EH) imaging in a patient study.
Methods: Three solutions in similar ion and protein concentrations with endolymph, perilymph, and cerebrospinal fluid were prepared for variable flip angle (VFA) 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using different TR (10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms). Fifty-two patients with probable or definite Meniere's disease received unenhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using a long TR (20,000 ms) and 4-h-delay enhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR (TR 16,000 ms). Image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of them were compared. Agreement in the evaluation of the EH degree between them was analyzed.
Results: In the phantom study, CNRs between perilymphatic and endolymphatic samples of VFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms) were 6.66 ± 1.30, 17.90 ± 2.76, 23.87 ± 3.09, and 28.22 ± 3.15 (p < 0.001). In patient study, average score (3.65 ± 0.48 vs. 4.19 ± 0.40), SNR (34.56 ± 9.80 vs. 51.40 ± 11.27), and CNR (30.66 ± 10.55 vs. 45.08 ± 12.27) of unenhanced 3D-FLAIR were lower than enhanced 3D-FLAIR (p < 0.001). Evaluations of the two sequences showed excellent agreement in the cochlear and vestibule (Kappa value: 0.898 and 0.909).
Conclusions: The CFA 3D-FLAIR sequence using a long TR could be used in unenhanced EH imaging with high accuracy.
Clinical relevance statement: Unenhanced imaging of endolymphatic hydrops is valuable in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients, especially those who cannot receive contrast-enhanced MRI.
Key points: Ion and protein concentration differences can be utilized in differentiating endolymph and perilymph on MRI. Endolymphatic and perilymphatic samples could be differentiated in vitro on this 3D-FLAIR sequence. This unenhanced 3D-FLAIR sequence is in excellent agreement with the enhanced constant flip angle 3D-FLAIR sequence.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.