Exploration-Exploitation and Suicidal Behavior in Borderline Personality Disorder and Depression.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY JAMA Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1796
Aliona Tsypes, Michael N Hallquist, Angela Ianni, Aleksandra Kaurin, Aidan G C Wright, Alexandre Y Dombrovski
{"title":"Exploration-Exploitation and Suicidal Behavior in Borderline Personality Disorder and Depression.","authors":"Aliona Tsypes, Michael N Hallquist, Angela Ianni, Aleksandra Kaurin, Aidan G C Wright, Alexandre Y Dombrovski","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Clinical theory and behavioral studies suggest that people experiencing suicidal crisis are often unable to find constructive solutions or incorporate useful information into their decisions, resulting in premature convergence on suicide and neglect of better alternatives. However, prior studies of suicidal behavior have not formally examined how individuals resolve the tradeoffs between exploiting familiar options and exploring potentially superior alternatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate exploration and exploitation in suicidal behavior from the formal perspective of reinforcement learning.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Two case-control behavioral studies of exploration-exploitation of a large 1-dimensional continuous space and a 21-day prospective ambulatory study of suicidal ideation were conducted between April 2016 and March 2022. Participants were recruited from inpatient psychiatric units, outpatient clinics, and the community in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and underwent laboratory and ambulatory assessments. Adults diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and midlife and late-life major depressive disorder (MDD) were included, with each sample including demographically equated groups with a history of high-lethality suicide attempts, low-lethality suicide attempts, individuals with BPD or MDD but no suicide attempts, and control individuals without psychiatric disorders. The MDD sample also included a subgroup with serious suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Behavioral (model-free and model-derived) indices of exploration and exploitation, suicide attempt lethality (Beck Lethality Scale), and prospectively assessed suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BPD group included 171 adults (mean [SD] age, 30.55 [9.13] years; 135 [79%] female). The MDD group included 143 adults (mean [SD] age, 62.03 [6.82] years; 81 [57%] female). Across the BPD (χ23 = 50.68; P < .001) and MDD (χ24 = 36.34; P < .001) samples, individuals with high-lethality suicide attempts discovered fewer options than other groups as they were unable to shift away from unrewarded options. In contrast, those with low-lethality attempts were prone to excessive behavioral shifts after rewarded and unrewarded actions. No differences were seen in strategic early exploration or in exploitation. Among 84 participants with BPD in the ambulatory study, 56 reported suicidal ideation. Underexploration also predicted incident suicidal ideation (χ21 = 30.16; P < .001), validating the case-control results prospectively. The findings were robust to confounds, including medication exposure, affective state, and behavioral heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings suggest that narrow exploration and inability to abandon inferior options are associated with serious suicidal behavior and chronic suicidal thoughts. By contrast, individuals in this study who engaged in low-lethality suicidal behavior displayed a low threshold for taking potentially disadvantageous actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1010-1019"},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Clinical theory and behavioral studies suggest that people experiencing suicidal crisis are often unable to find constructive solutions or incorporate useful information into their decisions, resulting in premature convergence on suicide and neglect of better alternatives. However, prior studies of suicidal behavior have not formally examined how individuals resolve the tradeoffs between exploiting familiar options and exploring potentially superior alternatives.

Objective: To investigate exploration and exploitation in suicidal behavior from the formal perspective of reinforcement learning.

Design, setting, and participants: Two case-control behavioral studies of exploration-exploitation of a large 1-dimensional continuous space and a 21-day prospective ambulatory study of suicidal ideation were conducted between April 2016 and March 2022. Participants were recruited from inpatient psychiatric units, outpatient clinics, and the community in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and underwent laboratory and ambulatory assessments. Adults diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and midlife and late-life major depressive disorder (MDD) were included, with each sample including demographically equated groups with a history of high-lethality suicide attempts, low-lethality suicide attempts, individuals with BPD or MDD but no suicide attempts, and control individuals without psychiatric disorders. The MDD sample also included a subgroup with serious suicidal ideation.

Main outcomes and measures: Behavioral (model-free and model-derived) indices of exploration and exploitation, suicide attempt lethality (Beck Lethality Scale), and prospectively assessed suicidal ideation.

Results: The BPD group included 171 adults (mean [SD] age, 30.55 [9.13] years; 135 [79%] female). The MDD group included 143 adults (mean [SD] age, 62.03 [6.82] years; 81 [57%] female). Across the BPD (χ23 = 50.68; P < .001) and MDD (χ24 = 36.34; P < .001) samples, individuals with high-lethality suicide attempts discovered fewer options than other groups as they were unable to shift away from unrewarded options. In contrast, those with low-lethality attempts were prone to excessive behavioral shifts after rewarded and unrewarded actions. No differences were seen in strategic early exploration or in exploitation. Among 84 participants with BPD in the ambulatory study, 56 reported suicidal ideation. Underexploration also predicted incident suicidal ideation (χ21 = 30.16; P < .001), validating the case-control results prospectively. The findings were robust to confounds, including medication exposure, affective state, and behavioral heterogeneity.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings suggest that narrow exploration and inability to abandon inferior options are associated with serious suicidal behavior and chronic suicidal thoughts. By contrast, individuals in this study who engaged in low-lethality suicidal behavior displayed a low threshold for taking potentially disadvantageous actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘型人格障碍和抑郁症患者的探索-剥削和自杀行为。
重要性:临床理论和行为学研究表明,经历自杀危机的人往往无法找到建设性的解决方案,也无法将有用的信息纳入决策中,从而导致过早地趋向于自杀,而忽视了更好的选择。然而,之前对自杀行为的研究并未正式考察个体如何在利用熟悉的选择和探索潜在的更好选择之间进行权衡:从强化学习的正式角度研究自杀行为中的探索和利用:在2016年4月至2022年3月期间,对一个大型一维连续空间的探索-利用进行了两项病例对照行为研究,并对自杀意念进行了为期21天的前瞻性流动研究。参与者从宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市的精神病住院部、门诊部和社区招募,并接受了实验室和门诊评估。研究对象包括被诊断为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)以及中年和晚年重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的成年人,每个样本都包括在人口统计学上等同的有高致死率自杀未遂史、低致死率自杀未遂史、有BPD或MDD但无自杀未遂史的人,以及无精神障碍的对照组。MDD 样本还包括一个有严重自杀意念的亚组:主要结果和测量指标:行为(无模型和模型衍生)探索和利用指数、自杀未遂致死率(贝克致死率量表)以及前瞻性评估的自杀意念:BPD组包括171名成年人(平均[标码]年龄为30.55[9.13]岁;女性135人[79%])。MDD 组包括 143 名成年人(平均 [SD] 年龄为 62.03 [6.82] 岁;81 [57%] 为女性)。在 BPD 组中(χ23 = 50.68; P 结论和相关性:研究结果表明,狭隘的探索和无法放弃劣质选择与严重的自杀行为和长期自杀想法有关。相比之下,本研究中从事低致死率自杀行为的个体对采取可能不利的行动表现出较低的阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Ending Unequal Treatment for People With Behavioral Health Conditions. Error in Results and Figure. War Exposure and DNA Methylation in Syrian Refugee Children and Adolescents. Repurposing Semaglutide and Liraglutide for Alcohol Use Disorder Synaptic Density in Early Stages of Psychosis and Clinical High Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1