Diagnosing sucrase-isomaltase deficiency: a comparison of a 13C-sucrose breath test and a duodenal enzyme assay.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1080/00365513.2024.2377960
Hanna Fjeldheim Dale, Milada Hagen, Chirajyoti Deb, Viggo Skar, Jørgen Valeur
{"title":"Diagnosing sucrase-isomaltase deficiency: a comparison of a <sup>13</sup>C-sucrose breath test and a duodenal enzyme assay.","authors":"Hanna Fjeldheim Dale, Milada Hagen, Chirajyoti Deb, Viggo Skar, Jørgen Valeur","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2377960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reduced activity of the sucrase-isomaltase (SI) enzyme can cause gastrointestinal symptoms. Biochemical measurement of SI activity in small intestinal biopsies is presently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of SI deficiency, but this invasive test is not suitable as a routine diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate a <sup>13</sup>C-sucrose-breath test (<sup>13</sup>CSBT) as a diagnostic tool for SI deficiency in an adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><sup>13</sup>CSBT results were compared to sucrase activity measured in duodenal biopsies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were included in the study, 4 of whom had celiac disease and the rest (<i>n</i> = 36) had normal histological findings. Nine patients (22.5%) had low sucrase activity measured using duodenal biopsies. No correlation was observed between enzymatic sucrase activity and the <sup>13</sup>CSBT results. The <sup>13</sup>CSBT-curves for the celiac patients versus patients with normal duodenal histology demonstrated that the patients with celiac disease were within the lower range of the distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a mismatch between the <sup>13</sup>CSBT results and the biochemically measured sucrase activity, suggesting that SI activity is not uniformly distributed throughout the small intestines. This methodological discrepancy should be acknowledged when diagnosing SI deficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"268-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2377960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reduced activity of the sucrase-isomaltase (SI) enzyme can cause gastrointestinal symptoms. Biochemical measurement of SI activity in small intestinal biopsies is presently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of SI deficiency, but this invasive test is not suitable as a routine diagnostic tool.

Aim: To evaluate a 13C-sucrose-breath test (13CSBT) as a diagnostic tool for SI deficiency in an adult population.

Methods: 13CSBT results were compared to sucrase activity measured in duodenal biopsies.

Results: Forty patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were included in the study, 4 of whom had celiac disease and the rest (n = 36) had normal histological findings. Nine patients (22.5%) had low sucrase activity measured using duodenal biopsies. No correlation was observed between enzymatic sucrase activity and the 13CSBT results. The 13CSBT-curves for the celiac patients versus patients with normal duodenal histology demonstrated that the patients with celiac disease were within the lower range of the distribution.

Conclusion: We observed a mismatch between the 13CSBT results and the biochemically measured sucrase activity, suggesting that SI activity is not uniformly distributed throughout the small intestines. This methodological discrepancy should be acknowledged when diagnosing SI deficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断蔗糖酶-异麦芽糖酶缺乏症:13C-蔗糖呼气试验与十二指肠酶测定法的比较。
背景:蔗糖异麦芽糖酶(SI)活性降低可导致胃肠道症状。目的:评估 13C-蔗糖呼气试验(13CSBT)作为诊断成人 SI 缺乏症的工具的效果。方法:将 13CSBT 结果与十二指肠活检中测得的蔗糖酶活性进行比较:研究共纳入了 40 名有胃肠道症状的患者,其中 4 人患有乳糜泻,其余患者(n = 36)的组织学检查结果正常。九名患者(22.5%)的十二指肠活检结果显示蔗糖酶活性较低。酶促蔗糖酶活性与 13CSBT 结果之间没有相关性。乳糜泻患者与十二指肠组织学正常患者的 13CSBT 曲线显示,乳糜泻患者的分布范围较低:我们观察到 13CSBT 结果与生化测定的蔗糖酶活性不匹配,这表明蔗糖酶活性在整个小肠的分布并不均匀。在诊断 SI 缺乏症时,应认识到这一方法上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
期刊最新文献
Analytical interference on measurement of immunoglobulins in monoclonal gammopathy. FlowDiff: a simple, flow cytometry-based approach for performing a leukocyte differential count. Reference intervals for 23 common biochemical parameters during pregnancy and the first six postpartum months. Prevalence of monoclonal proteins in patients with isolated hypogammaglobulinemia on serum protein electrophoresis. Challenges of preanalytical variables in erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a CUBE 30 touch evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1