Hanna Fjeldheim Dale, Milada Hagen, Chirajyoti Deb, Viggo Skar, Jørgen Valeur
{"title":"Diagnosing sucrase-isomaltase deficiency: a comparison of a <sup>13</sup>C-sucrose breath test and a duodenal enzyme assay.","authors":"Hanna Fjeldheim Dale, Milada Hagen, Chirajyoti Deb, Viggo Skar, Jørgen Valeur","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2377960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reduced activity of the sucrase-isomaltase (SI) enzyme can cause gastrointestinal symptoms. Biochemical measurement of SI activity in small intestinal biopsies is presently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of SI deficiency, but this invasive test is not suitable as a routine diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate a <sup>13</sup>C-sucrose-breath test (<sup>13</sup>CSBT) as a diagnostic tool for SI deficiency in an adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><sup>13</sup>CSBT results were compared to sucrase activity measured in duodenal biopsies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were included in the study, 4 of whom had celiac disease and the rest (<i>n</i> = 36) had normal histological findings. Nine patients (22.5%) had low sucrase activity measured using duodenal biopsies. No correlation was observed between enzymatic sucrase activity and the <sup>13</sup>CSBT results. The <sup>13</sup>CSBT-curves for the celiac patients versus patients with normal duodenal histology demonstrated that the patients with celiac disease were within the lower range of the distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a mismatch between the <sup>13</sup>CSBT results and the biochemically measured sucrase activity, suggesting that SI activity is not uniformly distributed throughout the small intestines. This methodological discrepancy should be acknowledged when diagnosing SI deficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"268-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2377960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Reduced activity of the sucrase-isomaltase (SI) enzyme can cause gastrointestinal symptoms. Biochemical measurement of SI activity in small intestinal biopsies is presently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of SI deficiency, but this invasive test is not suitable as a routine diagnostic tool.
Aim: To evaluate a 13C-sucrose-breath test (13CSBT) as a diagnostic tool for SI deficiency in an adult population.
Methods: 13CSBT results were compared to sucrase activity measured in duodenal biopsies.
Results: Forty patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were included in the study, 4 of whom had celiac disease and the rest (n = 36) had normal histological findings. Nine patients (22.5%) had low sucrase activity measured using duodenal biopsies. No correlation was observed between enzymatic sucrase activity and the 13CSBT results. The 13CSBT-curves for the celiac patients versus patients with normal duodenal histology demonstrated that the patients with celiac disease were within the lower range of the distribution.
Conclusion: We observed a mismatch between the 13CSBT results and the biochemically measured sucrase activity, suggesting that SI activity is not uniformly distributed throughout the small intestines. This methodological discrepancy should be acknowledged when diagnosing SI deficiency.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.