Routine Postclinical Event Debriefings on Inpatient Pediatric Units.

Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2023-007452
Jenny Bohorquez, Amee D Patel, Rachel Borders, April Gorman, Chelsea Reynolds, Kristin Ritchie, Natalie Denson, Courtney M Solomon
{"title":"Routine Postclinical Event Debriefings on Inpatient Pediatric Units.","authors":"Jenny Bohorquez, Amee D Patel, Rachel Borders, April Gorman, Chelsea Reynolds, Kristin Ritchie, Natalie Denson, Courtney M Solomon","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2023-007452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Debriefings are an underutilized opportunity to enhance team performance and safety culture. Little is known about the impact of postclinical event debriefing programs in Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM). We sought to develop a standardized debriefing process with multidisciplinary involvement after all clinical events on PHM service lines. Our primary aim was to achieve 75% debriefing completion rate over 12 months with debriefing duration less than 10 minutes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standardized postclinical event debriefing process was created at a large tertiary children's hospital. We aimed to debrief after clinical events on PHM services. The debriefing process was developed with key stakeholders and used a key driver diagram and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to refine the process. The project team reviewed the data monthly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During our 20-month study period, debriefing completion rate sustained a median of 66% with a median debriefing time of 7 minutes. Most debriefings (61%) had all core team members present with attending physicians (pediatric hospitalists) being absent most often. Barriers to debriefing with all core members present included service type, time of day, and shift change. Process changes were implemented based on concerns addressed in the debriefings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary, postclinical event debriefings were successfully implemented on inpatient pediatric wards. Future steps include process implementation on non-PHM units in our hospital based on expressed interest and to further assess how debriefings optimize team performance and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"632-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Debriefings are an underutilized opportunity to enhance team performance and safety culture. Little is known about the impact of postclinical event debriefing programs in Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM). We sought to develop a standardized debriefing process with multidisciplinary involvement after all clinical events on PHM service lines. Our primary aim was to achieve 75% debriefing completion rate over 12 months with debriefing duration less than 10 minutes.

Methods: A standardized postclinical event debriefing process was created at a large tertiary children's hospital. We aimed to debrief after clinical events on PHM services. The debriefing process was developed with key stakeholders and used a key driver diagram and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to refine the process. The project team reviewed the data monthly.

Results: During our 20-month study period, debriefing completion rate sustained a median of 66% with a median debriefing time of 7 minutes. Most debriefings (61%) had all core team members present with attending physicians (pediatric hospitalists) being absent most often. Barriers to debriefing with all core members present included service type, time of day, and shift change. Process changes were implemented based on concerns addressed in the debriefings.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary, postclinical event debriefings were successfully implemented on inpatient pediatric wards. Future steps include process implementation on non-PHM units in our hospital based on expressed interest and to further assess how debriefings optimize team performance and improve clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科住院部常规临床事件后汇报。
背景和目标:汇报是一个未被充分利用的提高团队绩效和安全文化的机会。人们对儿科医院医学(PHM)临床事件后汇报计划的影响知之甚少。我们试图在儿科医院医疗服务线的所有临床事件发生后制定一个多学科参与的标准化汇报流程。我们的主要目标是在12个月内实现75%的汇报完成率,汇报持续时间少于10分钟:方法:我们在一家大型三级儿童医院建立了标准化的临床事件后汇报流程。我们的目标是在PHM服务的临床事件后进行汇报。我们与主要利益相关者共同制定了汇报流程,并使用关键驱动因素图和 "计划-执行-研究-行动 "循环来完善流程。项目小组每月审查数据:在为期 20 个月的研究期间,汇报完成率的中位数为 66%,汇报时间的中位数为 7 分钟。大多数汇报(61%)都有所有核心团队成员出席,主治医师(儿科住院医师)缺席的情况最为常见。阻碍所有核心成员到场汇报的因素包括服务类型、时间和换班。根据汇报中解决的问题,对流程进行了修改:结论:在儿科住院病房成功实施了多学科临床事件后汇报。今后的工作包括根据各方表达的兴趣,在本医院的非儿科病房实施流程,并进一步评估汇报如何优化团队绩效和改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
Testing and Treatment Thresholds for Pediatric Pneumonia in the Emergency Department. It's More Complicated Than Interpreter Use: Improving Care for Non-English-Speaking Families. Factors Associated With Nirsevimab Uptake in Healthy Newborns. Nirsevimab Administration During the Birth Hospitalization. Extravasation Identification and Management in Neonates and Pediatrics: A Cross Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1