The majority of patients report satisfaction more than 24 years after temporomandibular joint discectomy.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s10006-024-01280-9
Esmeralda Bäckström, Anders Wänman, Mats Sjöström
{"title":"The majority of patients report satisfaction more than 24 years after temporomandibular joint discectomy.","authors":"Esmeralda Bäckström, Anders Wänman, Mats Sjöström","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01280-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate long-term outcomes after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included patients (n = 64) had undergone discectomy during 1989-1998 at Umeå University Hospital. A questionnaire was used to evaluate pre- and postoperative symptoms, postoperative complications, general pain, and subjective opinion about the outcome of the surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results are based on responses from 47 patients (40 women/7 men), including 36 (30 women/6 men) who completed the questionnaire and 11 (10 women/1 man) who were contacted by telephone and answered selected questions. Seventeen patients were excluded because of death, a move abroad, declining to participate, or no available patient information. Among the respondents, 41 (87%) were satisfied with the results, five (11%) were unsatisfied, and one (2%) patient did not answer the question. The results showed a significant long-term improvement in locking, clicking/crepitation, and pain when chewing or opening the jaw (p = 0.001). The prevalence of headaches had decreased significantly at follow-up (p = 0.001). Reported impaired jaw-opening capacity showed no significant improvement (p = 0.08). Of the 47 respondents, 19 (40%) had asked for additional treatment after the discectomy, and six of the 19 patients (13%) had undergone more surgery of the joint.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this retrospective long-term follow-up study indicate that TMJ discectomy has a high success rate, as most patients were satisfied with the postoperative results. Discectomy is thus an effective surgical intervention for patients with disabling TMJ pain and dysfunction when conservative interventions have been unsuccessful.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01280-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate long-term outcomes after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discectomy.

Methods: Included patients (n = 64) had undergone discectomy during 1989-1998 at Umeå University Hospital. A questionnaire was used to evaluate pre- and postoperative symptoms, postoperative complications, general pain, and subjective opinion about the outcome of the surgery.

Results: The results are based on responses from 47 patients (40 women/7 men), including 36 (30 women/6 men) who completed the questionnaire and 11 (10 women/1 man) who were contacted by telephone and answered selected questions. Seventeen patients were excluded because of death, a move abroad, declining to participate, or no available patient information. Among the respondents, 41 (87%) were satisfied with the results, five (11%) were unsatisfied, and one (2%) patient did not answer the question. The results showed a significant long-term improvement in locking, clicking/crepitation, and pain when chewing or opening the jaw (p = 0.001). The prevalence of headaches had decreased significantly at follow-up (p = 0.001). Reported impaired jaw-opening capacity showed no significant improvement (p = 0.08). Of the 47 respondents, 19 (40%) had asked for additional treatment after the discectomy, and six of the 19 patients (13%) had undergone more surgery of the joint.

Conclusion: The results of this retrospective long-term follow-up study indicate that TMJ discectomy has a high success rate, as most patients were satisfied with the postoperative results. Discectomy is thus an effective surgical intervention for patients with disabling TMJ pain and dysfunction when conservative interventions have been unsuccessful.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大多数患者在颞下颌关节切除术后 24 年以上都表示满意。
目的:回顾性评估颞下颌关节(TMJ)切除术后的长期疗效:纳入的患者(n = 64)于 1989-1998 年期间在于默奥大学医院接受了颞下颌关节切除术。调查问卷用于评估术前和术后症状、术后并发症、全身疼痛以及对手术结果的主观看法:结果基于47名患者(40名女性/7名男性)的回答,其中36名患者(30名女性/6名男性)填写了问卷,11名患者(10名女性/1名男性)通过电话联系并回答了选定的问题。有 17 名患者因死亡、移居国外、拒绝参与或没有可用的患者信息而被排除在外。受访者中,41 人(87%)对结果表示满意,5 人(11%)不满意,1 人(2%)没有回答问题。结果显示,咀嚼或张开下颌时的锁定感、咔嗒声/吱吱作响以及疼痛感均有明显的长期改善(P = 0.001)。随访期间,头痛的发生率明显下降(p = 0.001)。据报告,下颌张开能力受损的情况没有明显改善(p = 0.08)。在47名受访者中,19人(40%)在椎间盘切除术后要求进行额外治疗,19名患者中有6人(13%)接受了更多的关节手术:这项回顾性长期随访研究的结果表明,颞下颌关节盘切除术的成功率很高,因为大多数患者对术后效果感到满意。因此,对于保守治疗无效的致残性颞下颌关节疼痛和功能障碍患者来说,颞下颌关节盘切除术是一种有效的手术治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Mapping trends in preemptive analgesia related to oral surgery with the use of Ibuprofen: a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis of bibliometric parameters. Correction to: Acute orbital compartment syndrome due to traumatic hemorrhage: 4-year case series and relevant literature review with emphasis on its management. Influence of clinical expertise and practical experience on transfer accuracy in guided dental implant placement - an in vitro study. Clinical results of two different three-dimensional plate types for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a retrospective analysis. Clinicopathologic and imaging features of odontogenic myxomas: a multi-institutional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1