Unraveling spatial heterogeneity of soil legacy phosphorus in subtropical grasslands

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1002/eap.3007
Jiangxiao Qiu, Ran Zhi, Elizabeth H. Boughton, Haoyu Li, Charlotte R. B. Henderson, Daniel F. Petticord, Jed P. Sparks, Amartya Saha, K. Ramesh Reddy
{"title":"Unraveling spatial heterogeneity of soil legacy phosphorus in subtropical grasslands","authors":"Jiangxiao Qiu,&nbsp;Ran Zhi,&nbsp;Elizabeth H. Boughton,&nbsp;Haoyu Li,&nbsp;Charlotte R. B. Henderson,&nbsp;Daniel F. Petticord,&nbsp;Jed P. Sparks,&nbsp;Amartya Saha,&nbsp;K. Ramesh Reddy","doi":"10.1002/eap.3007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Humans have profoundly altered phosphorus (P) cycling across scales. Agriculturally driven changes (e.g., excessive P-fertilization and manure addition), in particular, have resulted in pronounced P accumulations in soils, often known as “soil legacy P.” These legacy P reserves serve as persistent and long-term nonpoint sources, inducing downstream eutrophication and ecosystem services degradation. While there is considerable scientific and policy interest in legacy P, its fine-scale spatial heterogeneity, underlying drivers, and scales of variance remain unclear. Here we present an extensive field sampling (150-m interval grid) and analysis of 1438 surface soils (0–15 cm) in 2020 for two typical subtropical grassland types managed for livestock production: Intensively managed (IM) and Semi-natural (SN) pastures. We ask the following questions: (1) What is the spatial variability, and are there hotspots of soil legacy P? (2) Does soil legacy P vary primarily within pastures, among pastures, or between pasture types? (3) How does soil legacy P relate to pasture management intensity, soil and geographic characteristics? and (4) What is the relationship between soil legacy P and aboveground plant tissue P concentration? Our results showed that three measurements of soil legacy P (total P, Mehlich-1, and Mehlich-3 extractable P representing labile P pools) varied substantially across the landscape. Spatial autoregressive models revealed that soil organic matter, pH, available Fe and Al, elevation, and pasture management intensity were crucial predictors for spatial patterns of soil P, although models were more reliable for predicting total P (68.9%) than labile P. Our analysis further demonstrated that total variance in soil legacy P was greater in IM than SN pastures, and intensified pasture management rescaled spatial patterns of soil legacy P. In particular, after controlling for sample size, soil P was extremely variable at small scales, with variance diminished as spatial scale increased. Our results suggest that broad pasture- or farm-level best management practices may be limited and less efficient, especially for more IM pastures. Rather, management to curtail soil legacy P and mitigate P loading and losses should be implemented at fine scales designed to target spatially distinct P hotspots across the landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.3007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans have profoundly altered phosphorus (P) cycling across scales. Agriculturally driven changes (e.g., excessive P-fertilization and manure addition), in particular, have resulted in pronounced P accumulations in soils, often known as “soil legacy P.” These legacy P reserves serve as persistent and long-term nonpoint sources, inducing downstream eutrophication and ecosystem services degradation. While there is considerable scientific and policy interest in legacy P, its fine-scale spatial heterogeneity, underlying drivers, and scales of variance remain unclear. Here we present an extensive field sampling (150-m interval grid) and analysis of 1438 surface soils (0–15 cm) in 2020 for two typical subtropical grassland types managed for livestock production: Intensively managed (IM) and Semi-natural (SN) pastures. We ask the following questions: (1) What is the spatial variability, and are there hotspots of soil legacy P? (2) Does soil legacy P vary primarily within pastures, among pastures, or between pasture types? (3) How does soil legacy P relate to pasture management intensity, soil and geographic characteristics? and (4) What is the relationship between soil legacy P and aboveground plant tissue P concentration? Our results showed that three measurements of soil legacy P (total P, Mehlich-1, and Mehlich-3 extractable P representing labile P pools) varied substantially across the landscape. Spatial autoregressive models revealed that soil organic matter, pH, available Fe and Al, elevation, and pasture management intensity were crucial predictors for spatial patterns of soil P, although models were more reliable for predicting total P (68.9%) than labile P. Our analysis further demonstrated that total variance in soil legacy P was greater in IM than SN pastures, and intensified pasture management rescaled spatial patterns of soil legacy P. In particular, after controlling for sample size, soil P was extremely variable at small scales, with variance diminished as spatial scale increased. Our results suggest that broad pasture- or farm-level best management practices may be limited and less efficient, especially for more IM pastures. Rather, management to curtail soil legacy P and mitigate P loading and losses should be implemented at fine scales designed to target spatially distinct P hotspots across the landscape.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示亚热带草原土壤遗留磷的空间异质性。
人类已经深刻改变了磷的跨尺度循环。特别是农业驱动的变化(如过量施用磷肥和添加粪便)导致土壤中的磷明显累积,通常被称为 "土壤遗留磷"。这些遗留的 P 储备可作为持久和长期的非点源,导致下游富营养化和生态系统服务退化。虽然科学界和政策界对遗留 P 颇感兴趣,但其精细尺度空间异质性、潜在驱动因素和差异尺度仍不清楚。在此,我们对 2020 年两种典型的亚热带畜牧生产管理草地类型的 1438 块表层土壤(0-15 厘米)进行了广泛的实地采样(150 米间隔网格)和分析:集中管理(IM)和半自然(SN)牧场。我们提出了以下问题:(1) 空间变异性如何,是否存在土壤遗留 P 的热点?(2)土壤中遗留的 P 主要是在牧场内部、牧场之间还是在不同类型的牧场之间变化?(3) 土壤遗留 P 与牧场管理强度、土壤和地理特征的关系如何? (4) 土壤遗留 P 与地上植物组织 P 浓度之间的关系如何?我们的研究结果表明,土壤遗留 P 的三种测量值(总 P、代表易溶 P 池的 Mehlich-1 和 Mehlich-3 可提取 P)在整个地形上有很大差异。空间自回归模型显示,土壤有机质、pH 值、可利用的铁和铝、海拔高度和牧场管理强度是预测土壤钾空间模式的关键因素,尽管模型对总钾(68.9%)的预测比对可溶性钾的预测更可靠。我们的分析进一步表明,IM 型牧场的土壤遗留钾的总方差大于 SN 型牧场,强化牧场管理会改变土壤遗留钾的空间模式。我们的研究结果表明,广泛的牧场或农场层面的最佳管理方法可能是有限的,而且效率较低,尤其是对于更多的 IM 型牧场。相反,应在精细尺度上实施管理,以减少土壤中遗留的 P,并减轻 P 的负荷和损失,从而在整个地形上针对空间上不同的 P 热点进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
Probabilistic ecological risk assessment for deep‐sea mining: A Bayesian network for Chatham Rise, Pacific Ocean Active restoration efforts drive community succession and assembly in a desert during the past 53 years Declining ecological resilience and invasion resistance under climate change in the sagebrush region, United States Wheat field earthworms under divergent farming systems across a European climate gradient. Ecosystem service indicators on military-managed drylands in the Western United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1