Probing Dual Covalent Irreversible Inhibition of EGFR/FGFR4 by Electrophilic-Based Natural Compounds to Overcome Resistance and Enhance Combination Therapeutic Potentials and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY The Protein Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s10930-024-10211-2
Huimin Xue, Peng Chen, Jingyi Jiao, Xiaojun Zhu
{"title":"Probing Dual Covalent Irreversible Inhibition of EGFR/FGFR4 by Electrophilic-Based Natural Compounds to Overcome Resistance and Enhance Combination Therapeutic Potentials and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)","authors":"Huimin Xue,&nbsp;Peng Chen,&nbsp;Jingyi Jiao,&nbsp;Xiaojun Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s10930-024-10211-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent cancer types in the world and accounts for the majority of cases of primary liver cancer. A crucial part of the carcinogenesis of HCC involves aberrant stimulation of the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway. Therefore, FGFR4 inhibition has become a strategic therapeutic approach for the treatment of HCC. However, the clinical treatment procedure is significantly hampered by the prevalence of kinase inhibitors resistance. It was recently established that the activation of EGFR signaling was found to be one of the primary mechanisms mediating the acquired resistance to FGFR4 inhibitors, moreover, sensitivity to FGFR4 inhibitors was effectively restored by inhibiting EGFR. These results provide compelling evidence that dual inhibition of EGFR and FGFR4 could represent a viable therapeutic approach to overcome resistance, hence enhanced management of HCC. To this end, we proposed a dual irreversible inhibition strategy through covalent binding by naturally occurring electrophilic warhead-bearing compounds (curcumin, deoxyelephantopin, eupalmerin acetate, syringolin A and andrographolide) to covalently target both EGFR and FGFR4 through cysteine residues, Cys797 and Cys552, respectively. Covalent docking and covalent molecular dynamics (MM/MD<sup>cov</sup>) simulations combined with thermodynamic binding free energy calculations were performed, and the results were compared against known potent and selective covalent EGFR and FGFR4 inhibitors with available X-ray crystal structures, Afatinib and BLU9931, respectively. Curcumin, deoxyelephantopin, eupalmerin acetate, syringolin A, and andrographolide showed relative binding free energies of -22.85, -17.14, -12.98, -21.81, and − 19.00 kcal/mol against EGFR and − 41.06, -29.45, -24.76, -40.11, and − 37.55 kcal/mol against FGFR4, respectively. The mechanisms of binding were emphasized by hydrogen bonding and binding forces analysis as well as active site physicochemical profiling. The findings of this study identified that curcumin, syringolin A and andrographolide—but not eupalmerin acetate or deoxyelephantopin —could be viable dual EGFR and FGFR4 covalent irreversible inhibitors and could be implemented in HCC combination therapy protocols alone or in conjunction with other chemotherapeutic agents. Investigations of this study conclusively indicate dual blockade of EGFR and FGFR4 may be a promising future therapeutic strategy for enhanced management of HCC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":793,"journal":{"name":"The Protein Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"793 - 804"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Protein Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10930-024-10211-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent cancer types in the world and accounts for the majority of cases of primary liver cancer. A crucial part of the carcinogenesis of HCC involves aberrant stimulation of the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway. Therefore, FGFR4 inhibition has become a strategic therapeutic approach for the treatment of HCC. However, the clinical treatment procedure is significantly hampered by the prevalence of kinase inhibitors resistance. It was recently established that the activation of EGFR signaling was found to be one of the primary mechanisms mediating the acquired resistance to FGFR4 inhibitors, moreover, sensitivity to FGFR4 inhibitors was effectively restored by inhibiting EGFR. These results provide compelling evidence that dual inhibition of EGFR and FGFR4 could represent a viable therapeutic approach to overcome resistance, hence enhanced management of HCC. To this end, we proposed a dual irreversible inhibition strategy through covalent binding by naturally occurring electrophilic warhead-bearing compounds (curcumin, deoxyelephantopin, eupalmerin acetate, syringolin A and andrographolide) to covalently target both EGFR and FGFR4 through cysteine residues, Cys797 and Cys552, respectively. Covalent docking and covalent molecular dynamics (MM/MDcov) simulations combined with thermodynamic binding free energy calculations were performed, and the results were compared against known potent and selective covalent EGFR and FGFR4 inhibitors with available X-ray crystal structures, Afatinib and BLU9931, respectively. Curcumin, deoxyelephantopin, eupalmerin acetate, syringolin A, and andrographolide showed relative binding free energies of -22.85, -17.14, -12.98, -21.81, and − 19.00 kcal/mol against EGFR and − 41.06, -29.45, -24.76, -40.11, and − 37.55 kcal/mol against FGFR4, respectively. The mechanisms of binding were emphasized by hydrogen bonding and binding forces analysis as well as active site physicochemical profiling. The findings of this study identified that curcumin, syringolin A and andrographolide—but not eupalmerin acetate or deoxyelephantopin —could be viable dual EGFR and FGFR4 covalent irreversible inhibitors and could be implemented in HCC combination therapy protocols alone or in conjunction with other chemotherapeutic agents. Investigations of this study conclusively indicate dual blockade of EGFR and FGFR4 may be a promising future therapeutic strategy for enhanced management of HCC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究亲电天然化合物对表皮生长因子受体/表皮生长因子受体4的双共价不可逆抑制作用,以克服抗药性并增强联合治疗的潜力和对肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗。
肝细胞癌(HCC)是世界上发病率最高的癌症类型之一,占原发性肝癌病例的大多数。HCC 癌变的关键部分涉及 FGF19-FGFR4 信号通路的异常刺激。因此,抑制 FGFR4 已成为治疗 HCC 的战略疗法。然而,激酶抑制剂耐药性的普遍存在严重阻碍了临床治疗进程。最近有研究发现,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)信号的激活是FGFR4抑制剂获得性耐药的主要机制之一,而且通过抑制表皮生长因子受体可有效恢复对FGFR4抑制剂的敏感性。这些结果提供了令人信服的证据,表明对表皮生长因子受体和表皮生长因子受体4的双重抑制可能是克服耐药性的可行治疗方法,从而提高对HCC的治疗效果。为此,我们提出了一种不可逆的双重抑制策略,即通过天然亲电弹头化合物(姜黄素、脱氧叶黄素、醋酸玉兰脂素、丁香油素 A 和穿心莲内酯)的共价结合,分别通过半胱氨酸残基 Cys797 和 Cys552 共价靶向表皮生长因子受体和表皮生长因子受体 4。研究人员结合热力学结合自由能计算,进行了共价对接和共价分子动力学(MM/MDcov)模拟,并将结果与已知的具有X射线晶体结构的强效和选择性共价表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和表皮生长因子受体(FGFR4)抑制剂阿法替尼(Afatinib)和BLU9931进行了比较。姜黄素、脱氧鸭跖草素、醋酸玉竹素、丁香油酚 A 和穿心莲内酯对表皮生长因子受体的相对结合自由能分别为 -22.85、-17.14、-12.98、-21.81 和 - 19.00 kcal/mol,对表皮生长因子受体 4 的相对结合自由能分别为 -41.06、-29.45、-24.76、-40.11 和 - 37.55 kcal/mol。氢键和结合力分析以及活性位点理化分析强调了结合机制。本研究的结果表明,姜黄素、丁香油酚 A 和穿心莲内酯(而非醋酸优降宁或脱氧苦参碱)是可行的表皮生长因子受体和表皮生长因子受体 4 双共价不可逆抑制剂,可单独或与其他化疗药物一起用于 HCC 联合治疗方案。本研究的调查结果表明,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和表皮生长因子受体(FGFR)4的双重阻断可能是未来治疗HCC的一种有前途的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Protein Journal
The Protein Journal 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Protein Journal (formerly the Journal of Protein Chemistry) publishes original research work on all aspects of proteins and peptides. These include studies concerned with covalent or three-dimensional structure determination (X-ray, NMR, cryoEM, EPR/ESR, optical methods, etc.), computational aspects of protein structure and function, protein folding and misfolding, assembly, genetics, evolution, proteomics, molecular biology, protein engineering, protein nanotechnology, protein purification and analysis and peptide synthesis, as well as the elucidation and interpretation of the molecular bases of biological activities of proteins and peptides. We accept original research papers, reviews, mini-reviews, hypotheses, opinion papers, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Influence of Cataract Causing Mutations on αA-Crystallin: A Computational Approach Unraveling the interaction between a glycolytic regulator protein EhPpdk and an anaphase promoting complex protein EhApc10: yeast two hybrid screening, in vitro binding assays and molecular simulation study Unravelling the Significance of Seed Proteomics: Insights into Seed Development, Function, and Agricultural Applications HaloClass: Salt-Tolerant Protein Classification with Protein Language Models Exosomes with Engineered Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor on Their Surfaces Can Proliferate Menstrual Blood Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Targeted Delivery for a Protein Drug
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1