Exploring the interplay between intellectual property models and sustainability transitions: A multi‐level analysis

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and The Environment Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1002/bse.3851
Akriti Jain, Anjula Gurtoo, Elizabeth Eppinger, Pratheeba Vimalnath, Frank Tietze
{"title":"Exploring the interplay between intellectual property models and sustainability transitions: A multi‐level analysis","authors":"Akriti Jain, Anjula Gurtoo, Elizabeth Eppinger, Pratheeba Vimalnath, Frank Tietze","doi":"10.1002/bse.3851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on international technology transfer and partnership agreements provides a comprehensive understanding of country‐level impacts of intellectual property (IP) rights on sustainability transitions. However, firm‐level studies on how firms use and share their IP to support sustainability practices remains limited. The paper disentangles the relationship between firm‐level IP models and sustainability practices drawing from a cross‐case analysis of 28 firms offering sustainable innovations across four sectors. Analysis of firms' year‐wise data collected from 854 documents (typically 1996–2021) and 58 in‐depth interviews exploring linkage between IP models and sustainability practices of firms engaged in sustainable innovation provide six key findings: (a) emphasis on safeguarding registered and unregistered IP assets among firms with sustainable innovations; (b) widespread adoption of selectively open inbound IP models coupled with diverse IP sharing mechanisms; (c) a preference for collaborative (joint) IP ownership among internally driven firms, contrasting with a tendency for exclusive in‐licensing among those reacting to external pressures; (d) a divergence in outbound IP models, with internally motivated firms favouring selectively open approaches and externally driven firms favouring closed IP models; (e) the adoption of fully open outbound IP models democratize sustainable innovation diffusion; and (f) leveraging broadly open outbound IP models alongside closed or selectively open models balances widespread use with access control and achieves significant social sustainability. A framework is hence developed to guide technology‐sharing policies and procedures. Therefore, the paper creates a platform for prescribing sustainable IP incentives for encouraging firms to share IP for wider diffusion of sustainable innovations.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on international technology transfer and partnership agreements provides a comprehensive understanding of country‐level impacts of intellectual property (IP) rights on sustainability transitions. However, firm‐level studies on how firms use and share their IP to support sustainability practices remains limited. The paper disentangles the relationship between firm‐level IP models and sustainability practices drawing from a cross‐case analysis of 28 firms offering sustainable innovations across four sectors. Analysis of firms' year‐wise data collected from 854 documents (typically 1996–2021) and 58 in‐depth interviews exploring linkage between IP models and sustainability practices of firms engaged in sustainable innovation provide six key findings: (a) emphasis on safeguarding registered and unregistered IP assets among firms with sustainable innovations; (b) widespread adoption of selectively open inbound IP models coupled with diverse IP sharing mechanisms; (c) a preference for collaborative (joint) IP ownership among internally driven firms, contrasting with a tendency for exclusive in‐licensing among those reacting to external pressures; (d) a divergence in outbound IP models, with internally motivated firms favouring selectively open approaches and externally driven firms favouring closed IP models; (e) the adoption of fully open outbound IP models democratize sustainable innovation diffusion; and (f) leveraging broadly open outbound IP models alongside closed or selectively open models balances widespread use with access control and achieves significant social sustainability. A framework is hence developed to guide technology‐sharing policies and procedures. Therefore, the paper creates a platform for prescribing sustainable IP incentives for encouraging firms to share IP for wider diffusion of sustainable innovations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索知识产权模式与可持续性转型之间的相互作用:多层次分析
对国际技术转让和合作伙伴协议的研究,使人们对知识产权在国家层面对可持续发展转型的影响有了全面的了解。然而,关于企业如何使用和分享知识产权以支持可持续发展实践的企业层面研究仍然有限。本文通过对四个行业 28 家提供可持续创新的公司进行交叉分析,厘清了公司层面的知识产权模式与可持续发展实践之间的关系。本文分析了从 854 份文件(通常为 1996 年至 2021 年)中收集的企业年度数据,并进行了 58 次深入访谈,探讨了从事可持续创新的企业的知识产权模式与可持续发展实践之间的联系:(a) 具有可持续创新能力的企业重视保护已注册和未注册的知识产权资产;(b) 普遍采用选择性开放的内向型知识产权模式,同时采用多样化的知识产权共享机制;(c) 内部驱动型企业倾向于合作(联合)知识产权所有权,而应对外部压力的企业则倾向于独家内向许可;(d) 对外知识产权模式存在差异,内部驱动的企业倾向于选择性开放的方式,外部驱动的企业倾向于封闭的知识产权模式;(e) 采用完全开放的对外知识产权模式可实现可持续创新传播的民主化;(f) 利用广泛开放的对外知识产权模式与封闭或选择性开放的模式,在广泛使用与访问控制之间取得平衡,并实现重要的社会可持续性。因此,本文提出了一个指导技术共享政策和程序的框架。因此,本文为制定可持续的知识产权激励措施提供了一个平台,以鼓励企业共享知识产权,从而更广泛地推广可持续创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Biodiversity reporting by United Kingdom (UK)‐listed companies: A review of extent, content and readability of disclosures A novel hybrid decision‐making framework for measuring Industry 4.0‐driven circular economy performance for textile industry Towards sustainability in the services industry: Does green top management support stimulate an organization's green operational performance? A moderated mediation model Firm commitments on climate change: Effects of science‐based targets on financial outcomes during the COVID‐19 crisis Correction to ‘Can the Sustainable Development Goals support nexus thinking in companies? The case of water’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1