Commodity Price and Indonesian Fiscal Policy: An SVAR Analysis with Non-Gaussian Errors

Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1515/jtse-2023-0037
Alfan Mansur
{"title":"Commodity Price and Indonesian Fiscal Policy: An SVAR Analysis with Non-Gaussian Errors","authors":"Alfan Mansur","doi":"10.1515/jtse-2023-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study exploits the non-Gaussianity for identification of a Bayesian SVAR model on newly unexplored monthly Indonesian data from 2007M1–2022M12, where we disentangle the commodity-related revenue from the total government revenues. Our main contribution is in labeling the statistically identified structural shocks as economic shocks by conducting a formal assessment of a set of proposed sign constraints. We simultaneously label a commodity price and three fiscal policy shocks, i.e. fiscal income tax, investment-spending, and consumption-spending shocks. Having evaluated their impacts, among the fiscal policy shocks, we find income tax shock the most impactful on output. Moreover, during the Covid crisis 2020–2021, the launched fiscal economic stimulus package (PEN program) positively contributed to the output. The recession of the Covid crisis could have deepened had the fiscal policymaker not responded at all. Albeit so, we should not overlook the contribution of the rising commodity prices to the output recovery. We also evaluate the commodity boom period in 2007–2009, the tax amnesty program in 2016–2017 and 2022, and the infrastructure spending boost in 2015. Our results suggest that output and retail sales would have been lower without the commodity price shock’s contribution during the commodity boom. Then, we find that tax amnesty and infrastructure spending boost policies contribute to higher retail sales.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jtse-2023-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study exploits the non-Gaussianity for identification of a Bayesian SVAR model on newly unexplored monthly Indonesian data from 2007M1–2022M12, where we disentangle the commodity-related revenue from the total government revenues. Our main contribution is in labeling the statistically identified structural shocks as economic shocks by conducting a formal assessment of a set of proposed sign constraints. We simultaneously label a commodity price and three fiscal policy shocks, i.e. fiscal income tax, investment-spending, and consumption-spending shocks. Having evaluated their impacts, among the fiscal policy shocks, we find income tax shock the most impactful on output. Moreover, during the Covid crisis 2020–2021, the launched fiscal economic stimulus package (PEN program) positively contributed to the output. The recession of the Covid crisis could have deepened had the fiscal policymaker not responded at all. Albeit so, we should not overlook the contribution of the rising commodity prices to the output recovery. We also evaluate the commodity boom period in 2007–2009, the tax amnesty program in 2016–2017 and 2022, and the infrastructure spending boost in 2015. Our results suggest that output and retail sales would have been lower without the commodity price shock’s contribution during the commodity boom. Then, we find that tax amnesty and infrastructure spending boost policies contribute to higher retail sales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
商品价格与印尼财政政策:非高斯误差的 SVAR 分析
本研究利用非高斯性对 2007 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月的印尼月度数据进行贝叶斯 SVAR 模型识别,我们将商品相关收入与政府总收入分离开来。我们的主要贡献在于通过对一系列拟议的符号约束进行正式评估,将统计识别出的结构性冲击标记为经济冲击。我们同时标记了一个商品价格和三个财政政策冲击,即财政所得税、投资支出和消费支出冲击。在对其影响进行评估后,我们发现在财政政策冲击中,所得税冲击对产出的影响最大。此外,在 2020-2021 年科维德危机期间,推出的一揽子财政经济刺激计划(PEN 计划)对产出起到了积极的促进作用。如果财政政策制定者没有采取任何应对措施,科维德危机的衰退可能会进一步加深。尽管如此,我们也不应忽视商品价格上涨对产出复苏的贡献。我们还评估了 2007-2009 年的大宗商品繁荣期、2016-2017 年和 2022 年的税收特赦计划以及 2015 年的基础设施支出增长。我们的结果表明,在大宗商品繁荣期,如果没有大宗商品价格冲击的贡献,产出和零售额会更低。然后,我们发现税收特赦和基础设施支出刺激政策有助于提高零售额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1