Partial Hedging in Rough Volatility Models

IF 1.4 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1137/23m1583090
Edouard Motte, Donatien Hainaut
{"title":"Partial Hedging in Rough Volatility Models","authors":"Edouard Motte, Donatien Hainaut","doi":"10.1137/23m1583090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 15, Issue 3, Page 601-652, September 2024. <br/> Abstract.This paper studies the problem of partial hedging within the framework of rough volatility models in an incomplete market setting. We employ a stochastic control problem formulation to minimize the discrepancy between a stochastic target and the terminal value of a hedging portfolio. As rough volatility models are neither Markovian nor semimartingales, stochastic control problems associated with rough models are quite complex to solve. Therefore, we propose a multifactor approximation of the rough volatility model and introduce the associated Markov stochastic control problem. We establish the convergence of the optimal solution for the Markov partial hedging problem to the optimal solution of the original problem as the number of factors tends to infinity. Furthermore, the optimal solution of the Markov problem can be derived by solving a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation and more precisely a nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE). Due to the inherent complexity of this nonlinear PDE, an explicit formula for the optimal solution is generally unattainable. By introducing the dual solution of the Markov problem and expressing the primal solution as a function of the dual solution, we derive approximate solutions to the Markov problem using a dual control method. This method allows for suboptimal choices of dual control to deduce lower and upper bounds on the optimal solution as well as suboptimal hedging ratios. In particular, explicit formulas for partial hedging strategies in a rough Heston model are derived.","PeriodicalId":48880,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1583090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 15, Issue 3, Page 601-652, September 2024.
Abstract.This paper studies the problem of partial hedging within the framework of rough volatility models in an incomplete market setting. We employ a stochastic control problem formulation to minimize the discrepancy between a stochastic target and the terminal value of a hedging portfolio. As rough volatility models are neither Markovian nor semimartingales, stochastic control problems associated with rough models are quite complex to solve. Therefore, we propose a multifactor approximation of the rough volatility model and introduce the associated Markov stochastic control problem. We establish the convergence of the optimal solution for the Markov partial hedging problem to the optimal solution of the original problem as the number of factors tends to infinity. Furthermore, the optimal solution of the Markov problem can be derived by solving a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation and more precisely a nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE). Due to the inherent complexity of this nonlinear PDE, an explicit formula for the optimal solution is generally unattainable. By introducing the dual solution of the Markov problem and expressing the primal solution as a function of the dual solution, we derive approximate solutions to the Markov problem using a dual control method. This method allows for suboptimal choices of dual control to deduce lower and upper bounds on the optimal solution as well as suboptimal hedging ratios. In particular, explicit formulas for partial hedging strategies in a rough Heston model are derived.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粗略波动模型中的部分套期保值
SIAM 金融数学期刊》第 15 卷第 3 期第 601-652 页,2024 年 9 月。 摘要:本文研究了不完全市场环境下,在粗糙波动率模型框架内的部分对冲问题。我们采用随机控制问题的表述方法,以最小化对冲组合的随机目标值与终值之间的差异。由于粗糙波动率模型既不是马尔可夫模型,也不是半马尔马特模型,因此与粗糙模型相关的随机控制问题的求解相当复杂。因此,我们提出了粗糙波动率模型的多因素近似,并引入了相关的马尔可夫随机控制问题。我们确定了当因子数趋于无穷大时,马尔可夫部分对冲问题的最优解收敛于原始问题的最优解。此外,马尔可夫问题的最优解可以通过求解汉密尔顿-雅各比-贝尔曼方程(Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation),更确切地说,是通过求解非线性偏微分方程(PDE)得到。由于这种非线性偏微分方程本身的复杂性,通常无法获得最优解的明确公式。通过引入马尔可夫问题的对偶解,并将原始解表达为对偶解的函数,我们利用对偶控制方法得出了马尔可夫问题的近似解。这种方法允许选择次优对偶控制,从而推导出最优解的下限和上限以及次优对冲比率。特别是推导出了粗略赫斯顿模型中部分对冲策略的明确公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics
SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics (SIFIN) addresses theoretical developments in financial mathematics as well as breakthroughs in the computational challenges they encompass. The journal provides a common platform for scholars interested in the mathematical theory of finance as well as practitioners interested in rigorous treatments of the scientific computational issues related to implementation. On the theoretical side, the journal publishes articles with demonstrable mathematical developments motivated by models of modern finance. On the computational side, it publishes articles introducing new methods and algorithms representing significant (as opposed to incremental) improvements on the existing state of affairs of modern numerical implementations of applied financial mathematics.
期刊最新文献
A Mean Field Game Approach to Bitcoin Mining Decentralized Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision A Two-Person Zero-Sum Game Approach for a Retirement Decision with Borrowing Constraints Option Pricing in Sandwiched Volterra Volatility Model Reconciling Rough Volatility with Jumps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1