No evidence for causal effects of C-reactive protein (CRP) on chronic pain conditions: a Mendelian randomization study

Pradeep Suri, Yakov A Tsepilov, Elizaveta E. Elgaeva, Frances MK Williams, Maxim Freydin, Ian Stanaway
{"title":"No evidence for causal effects of C-reactive protein (CRP) on chronic pain conditions: a Mendelian randomization study","authors":"Pradeep Suri, Yakov A Tsepilov, Elizaveta E. Elgaeva, Frances MK Williams, Maxim Freydin, Ian Stanaway","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to examine causal associations of C-reactive protein (CRP) with (1) spinal pain; (2) extent of multisite chronic pain; and (3) chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain. Design: Two-sample MR study. Setting/Subjects: We used summary statistics from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in multiple cohorts and biobanks. Genetic instrumental variables were taken from an exposure GWAS of CRP (n=204,402). Outcome GWASs examined spinal pain (n=1,028,947), extent of multisite chronic pain defined as the number of locations with chronic pain (n=387,649), and chronic widespread pain (n=249,843). Methods: We examined MR evidence for causal associations using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) analysis and sensitivity analyses using other methods. We calculated odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and p-values, using a Bonferroni correction (p<0.0166) to account for 3 primary comparisons. Results: Greater serum CRP (mg/L) was not significantly causally associated with spinal pain (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08; p=0.07) in IVW analysis. Greater serum CRP also showed no significant causal association with extent of multisite chronic pain in IVW analysis (beta coefficient= 0.014, standard error=0.011; p=0.19). CRP also showed no significant causal association with chronic widespread pain in IVW analysis (OR=1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.00; p=0.75). All secondary and sensitivity analyses also showed no significant associations. Conclusions: This MR study found no causal association of CRP on spinal pain, the extent of chronic pain, or chronic widespread pain. Future studies examining mechanistic biomarkers for pain conditions should consider other candidates besides CRP.","PeriodicalId":501393,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.24309700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to examine causal associations of C-reactive protein (CRP) with (1) spinal pain; (2) extent of multisite chronic pain; and (3) chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain. Design: Two-sample MR study. Setting/Subjects: We used summary statistics from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in multiple cohorts and biobanks. Genetic instrumental variables were taken from an exposure GWAS of CRP (n=204,402). Outcome GWASs examined spinal pain (n=1,028,947), extent of multisite chronic pain defined as the number of locations with chronic pain (n=387,649), and chronic widespread pain (n=249,843). Methods: We examined MR evidence for causal associations using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) analysis and sensitivity analyses using other methods. We calculated odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and p-values, using a Bonferroni correction (p<0.0166) to account for 3 primary comparisons. Results: Greater serum CRP (mg/L) was not significantly causally associated with spinal pain (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08; p=0.07) in IVW analysis. Greater serum CRP also showed no significant causal association with extent of multisite chronic pain in IVW analysis (beta coefficient= 0.014, standard error=0.011; p=0.19). CRP also showed no significant causal association with chronic widespread pain in IVW analysis (OR=1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.00; p=0.75). All secondary and sensitivity analyses also showed no significant associations. Conclusions: This MR study found no causal association of CRP on spinal pain, the extent of chronic pain, or chronic widespread pain. Future studies examining mechanistic biomarkers for pain conditions should consider other candidates besides CRP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有证据表明 C 反应蛋白 (CRP) 对慢性疼痛有因果影响:孟德尔随机研究
研究目的我们进行了一项孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以探讨 C 反应蛋白(CRP)与(1)脊柱疼痛;(2)多部位慢性疼痛程度;以及(3)慢性广泛性肌肉骨骼疼痛之间的因果关系。设计:双样本 MR 研究。设置/受试者:我们使用了在多个队列和生物库中进行的公开全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总统计数据。遗传工具变量来自 CRP 的暴露 GWAS(n=204,402)。结果 GWAS 研究了脊柱疼痛(n=1,028,947)、多部位慢性疼痛程度(定义为慢性疼痛部位的数量)(n=387,649)和慢性广泛性疼痛(n=249,843)。方法:我们使用逆方差加权(IVW)分析和其他方法进行敏感性分析,检查了 MR 的因果关系证据。我们计算了几率比(ORs)、95% 置信区间(95% CIs)和 p 值,并使用 Bonferroni 校正(p<0.0166)以考虑 3 个主要比较。结果在 IVW 分析中,较高的血清 CRP(毫克/升)与脊柱疼痛无明显因果关系(OR=1.04,95% CI 1.00-1.08;p=0.07)。在 IVW 分析中,更高的血清 CRP 与多部位慢性疼痛的程度也没有明显的因果关系(β 系数= 0.014,标准误差=0.011;P=0.19)。在 IVW 分析中,CRP 与慢性广泛性疼痛也没有明显的因果关系(OR=1.00,95% CI 1.00-1.00;P=0.75)。所有次级分析和敏感性分析也未显示出明显的关联性。结论:这项磁共振研究发现 CRP 与脊柱疼痛、慢性疼痛程度或慢性广泛性疼痛没有因果关系。未来研究疼痛状况的机理生物标志物时,应考虑 CRP 以外的其他候选指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subcallosal Cingulate structural connectivity as a biomarker for chronic low back pain Women with fibromyalgia: Insights into behavioral and brain imaging Towards validation of clinical measures to discriminate between nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain: cluster analysis of a cohort with chronic musculoskeletal pain Pain-related white-matter changes following mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging pilot study Mitigating the Opioid Epidemic: The Role of Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1